¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.16, no.2, 1988³â, pp.1-7
ÁÖ¿äÁ¶°æ¼ö¸ñÀÇ ¼öÇüºÐ·ù¹æ¹ý¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸: ´ÀƼ³ª¹«, ½ºÆ®·ÎºêÀ㳪¹«, ¹é¸ñ·ÃÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î
( Study on the Numerical Method of Classifying Treeforms : A case study of Zelkova serrata, Pinus strobus, and Magnolia denudata )
ÃÖÁؼö;±è³²Ãá;¹®¼®±â; ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ ³ó°ú´ëÇÐ °ü»ó¿ø¿¹Çаú;´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ ³ó°ú´ëÇÐ °ü»ó¿ø¿¹Çаú;ûÁÖ´ëÇб³ À̰ø´ëÇÐ Á¶°æÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
Á¶°æ¼ö¸ñÀÇ ¼öÇüÀº ¹è½Ä¼³°è½Ã °í·ÁÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÒ ±âº»¿ä¼Ò·Î½á ¹è½Ä¼³°èÀÇ ¼º°ø¿©ºÎ´Â ÀûÀýÇÑ ¼öÁ¾ÀÇ ¼±Á¤°ú Á¤È®ÇÑ ¼öÇüÀÇ ¿¹Ãø¿¡ Á¿ìµÈ´Ù°í ÇÒ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Á¶°æ¼ö¸ñÀÇ ¼öÇüÀº Åä¾çÀ̳ª ¼öºÐ, ±¤, ¿Âµµ, ¹Ù¶÷, ¿°ºÐ, °­¿ì·® µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ È¯°æ¿äÀΰú ÀüÁ¤ÀÛ¾÷À̳ª ÀÌ¿ëµîÀÇ ÀÎÀ§Àû¿äÀο¡ ÀÇÇØ °íÀ¯¼öÇü¿¡¼­ º¯ÇüµÉ ¿ì·Á°¡ ¸Å¿ì ³ô´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó ¼Ò¸ñÀÇ ½ÇÁ¦¼öÇüÀ» ÅëÇØ °íÀ¯¼öÇüÀ» ¿¹ÃøÇÏ´Â µ¥´Â ¸¹Àº ¾î·Á¿òÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸³ª, ±âÁ¸ ¹®Çå¿¡¼­´Â ¼º¸ñÀÇ ¼öÇü¸¸À» ¾ð±ÞÇÏ°í ½Ã°£°æ°ú¿¡ µû¸¥ ¼öÇüÀÇ º¯È­Æ¯¼ºÀ» ´Ù·çÁö ¾Ê°í ÀÖ¾î ¹è½Ä¼³°è¿¡ Å« µµ¿òÀ» ÁÖÁö ¸øÇϰí ÀÖ´Â ½ÇÁ¤ÀÌ´Ù. ¹è½Ç¼³°è½Ã ¼öÇü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÌÇØ´Â °¡Àå Áß¿äÇÑ °í·Á»çÇ× Áß ÇϳªÀ̹ǷΠ½Ã°£°æ¿¡ ´Ù¸¥ ¼öÇüÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ´Ù·é ÀÚ·á´Â Å« Àǹ̰¡ ÀÖ´Ù°í º»´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ½Ã°£°æ°ú¿¡ µû¸¥ Á¶°æ¼ö¸ñÀÇ ¼öÇüº¯È­¸¦ ¿¹ÃøÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀ» °³¹ßÇÏ¿© ±× °á°ú°¡ ¹è½Ä¼³°èÀÇ Âü°íÀÚ·á·Î Ȱ¿ëµÇµµ·Ï Çϸç, µ¿½Ã¿¡ ÀÌ ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀ» Åä´ë·Î ÇÏ¿© º¸´Ù ¸¹Àº Á¶°æ¼ö¸ñÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼öÇüº¯È­¸¦ ¿¹ÃøÇϴµ¥ ¿¬±¸¸ñÀûÀ» µÎ°í ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, Áß¿äÇÑ ¿¬±¸°á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°ÀÌ ¿ä¾àµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. 1. ´ÀƼ³ª¹«ÀÇ ¼öÇüÀº »óºÎºñ´ëÇüÀÎ ¸Í»óÇü°ú µµ¶õÇüÀÇ °è¿­¿¡¼­ ¿øÇü.Ÿ¿øÇüÀÇ °è¿­·Î º¯Çϴ Ư¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾úÀ¸¸ç, ¾Æ¿ï·¯ ¼ö°ü°í¿¡ ºñÇØ ¼ö°üº¹ÀÌ Á¡Â÷ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀ¸·Î ÆÄ¾ÇµÇ¾ú´Ù. 2. ½ºÆ®·ÎºêÀ㳪¹«ÀÇ ¼öÇüÀº ÇϺκñ´ëÇüÀÎ ¶õÇü ȤÀº ¿øÃßÇüÀÇ °è¿­¿¡ ¼ÓÇϸç, ¼º¸ñÀÌ µÇ¸é¼­ ¼ö°ü°í¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ¼ö°üº¹ÀÌ Áõ°¡Çϸ鼭 ¶õÇü°è¿­ÀÎ D-4¡­D-5·Î º¯ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. 3. ¹é¸ñ·ÃÀÇ ¼öÇüÀº ÇϺκñ´ëÇüÀÎ ³­Çü°è¿­Áß D-4·Î ¾ÈÁ¤µÇ°í ÀÖ´Â °æÇâÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¸ç, ½Ã°£°æ°ú¿¡ µû¸¥ ¶Ñ·ÇÇÑ º¯È­´Â ºñ±³Àû ¾ø´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸¿´À¸¸ç, C-3¡­C-5, D-4¿¡ °¡±î¿î ¼öÇüÀÓÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.ÀÌ»ó ´õ ¸¹ÀÌ ½ÄÀçµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ÀüüÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÚ»ýÁ¾ ´ë ¿Ü·¡Á¾ÀÇ ºñÀ²Àº 43:57À̾ú´Ù. 6. ÀÌ»ó°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ÅëÇØ ½ÄÀç¼öÁ¾ÀÇ ´Ù¾çÈ­, °ø°£À¯Çüº° ÀûÁ¤½Ä¹°ÀÇ ¼±Á¤, ÇâÅäÁ¾ ÀÌ¿ëÀÇ ÀϹÝÈ­ µîÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù°í »ç·áµÇ¾ú´Ù. ±×¸®ÇÏ¿© °­¿øµµ³»ÀÇ ¾ß»ý½Ä¹°·Î¼­ µµÆ¯À¯ÀÇ ÇâÅä¹Ì Ç¥Ãâ ¹× ½Ä¹°Á¾ÀÇ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÀÌ¿ëÀ» À§ÇØ °³¹ß¡¤º¸±ÞÇÒ °¡Ä¡°¡ ÀÖ´Â ÃÑ 254Á¾ÀÇ ½Ä¹°À» ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿© ±×µéÀÇ °ü»óºÎºÐ, ¿ëµµ, ¼º»ó µîÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù.ÇÑ ÇѰè Â÷±¤Á¤µµ´Â 40%Á¤µµ(ÀÚ¿¬±¤·®ÀÇ 60% ì¤ß¾ áôÎÃðÉËì)·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.~207.17 ppmÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç, ÆÐ·ùº° Æò±ÕÇÔ·®Àº ¹ÙÁö¶ô 12.16 ppm, ²¿¸· 14.98 ppm, ¹éÇÕÀÌ 15.84 ppm, ÇÇÁ¶°³ 16.58 ppm, È«ÇÕ 18.84 ppm, Àüº¹ÀÌ 21.46 ppm, °ñ¹ðÀÌ 29.71 ppm, ¼Ò¶ó°íµÕÀÌ 37.77 ppm ±¼ÀÌ 96.58 ppmÀ¸·Î °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò´Ù. 7. MnÀÇ Àüü ÇÔ·® ¹üÀ§´Â 0.13~8.72 ppmÀ̾ú°í °¢ ÆÐ·ùº° Æò±ÕÇÔ·®Àº Àüº¹ 0.96 ppm, ¼Ò¶ó°íµÕ 1.48 ppm, È«ÇÕ 2.25 ppm, °ñ¹ðÀÌ 2.46 ppm, ÇÇÁ¶°³ 2.80 ppm ¹éÇÕ 3.04 ppm, ¹ÙÁö¶ô 4.44 ppm, ²¿¸· 6.06 ppm, ±¼ 6.66 ppmÀ̾ú´Ù. 8. ÃøÁ¤µÈ ÆÐ·ùÁßÀÇ Áß±Ý¼Ó ºÐÆ÷°á°ú¿Í ±âŸ ±¹³»¿¡¼­ º¸°íµÈ ºÐ¼®Ä¡, ¿Ü±¹ÀÇ ºÐ¼®Ä¡ ¹× ÇöÁ¦Ä¡¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î ºñ±³ °ËÅäÇÏ¿© º¼ ¶§ ÃÖ°íÄ¡¿¡ À־ ´Ù¼Ò ³ôÀº °Íµµ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸³ª Æò±ÕÇÔ·®°ú 90%Ä¡¿¡ À־´Â ¹®Á¦½Ã µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ·®Àº ¾Æ´Ï¾ú´Ù. 9. ÆÐ·ùÁß »êÁöº°·Î ´Ù¼Ò ³ôÀºÄ¡¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³½ °Í¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿©´Â °è¼ÓÀûÀÎ Á¶»ç¿¬±¸°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù°í »ý°¢µÈ´Ù. in January and Julv samples. In multiple regression analysis am
Predicting treeform should be very important, eventhough it is difficult, step for landscape designers. This study was carried out to develop a method to classify the treeforms of landscape plants by numerical data. Twenty five treeforms are selected to be compared with 41 Zelkova serrata MAKINO, 26 Pinus strobus L., and 44 Magnolia denudata DESROUX. Statistical judgement was made by using X$^2$-Test. The results are summerized as follows. 1. Zelkova serrata was classified as B3 or C3. This species showed a tendency of changing from A type to B or C type, and the CL/CH ratio(canopy length/canopy height) is thought to be increased as aged. 2. pinus strobus was classified as D4-D5 and the CL/CH ratio tends to be increased as aged. 3. Magnolia denudata was classified as D4 and the change by aging was not observed clearly.
 
Ű¿öµå
 
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.16, no.2, 1988³â, pp.1-7
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO198811920956067)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿