¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.16, no.2, 1988³â, pp.9-21
µ¢±¼ÀåÄ¡ÀÇ °¡ÁöÀ¯ÀÎ½Ã±â ¹× °¢µµ°¡ »ýÀ° ¹× °³¹ß¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( The Effect of Stem Leading Time and Angles on the Flowering in Climbing Rose )
±ÇÁø¿À;ÃÖ»óÅÂ;±è¿ë¼ö; ºÎ°æ´ëÇб³ ³ó°ú´ëÇÐ;ºÎ°æ´ëÇб³ ³ó°ú´ëÇÐ;ºÎ°æ´ëÇб³ ³ó°ú´ëÇÐ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
µ¢±¼Àå¹ÌÀÇ ¹è½Ä ¹× °ü¸®¿¡ À־ ¿ë¼ú¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÑ »ç¿ë°ú °ü¼º°¡Ä¡ÀÇ Áõ°¡¸¦ ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î »ýÀ°Çüº°·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© °¡ÁöÀÇ À¯ÀÎ½Ã±â ¹× À¯Àΰ¢µµ°¡ »ýÀå°ú °³È­¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ½ÇÇèÇÏ¿´´Â¹Ù ¾òÀº °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. 1. ¿ÏÀü¸¸¼ºÇü, ¹Ý¸¸¼±Çü ±×¸®°í °ü¸ñÇü¿¡¼­, °¡Áö¸¦ ½ÅÀå»ýÀåÁß¿¡ ¼öÆò¿¡ °¡±õ°Ô À¯ÀÎÇÒ¼ö·Ï »óºÎ¿Í ÇϺο¡¼­ ¾ÆÀÇ Å©±â Â÷ÀÌ´Â °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´°í ¿ÜÇüÀº Àå°üÇü¿¡ °¡±î¿öÁö¸ç, ¾ÆÀÇ ¹ßÀ°Àº Ãæ½ÇÇÏ°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù. 2. ½ÅÀå»ýÀåÁß¿¡ À¯ÀÎÇÑ °¡ÁöÀÇ Á÷°æÀº »ýÀ°Çü¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ, ¼öÆòÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÎÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ »óºÎ¿Í ÇϺÎÀÇ Á÷°æÂ÷À̰¡ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿© ±½±â°¡ ±ÕÀÏÇÏ°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù. 3. °¡ÁöÀüüÀÇ ¸Í¾ÆÀ² ¹× °³È­À²À» Áõ°¡½Ã۱â À§Çؼ­´Â ¿ÏÀü¸¸¼ºÇüÀÇ °æ¼± À¯Àνñ⿡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ ¼öÆò¿¡ °¡±õ°Ô À¯ÀÎÇÒ¼ö·Ï °¡ÁöÀÇ ÇϺαîÁö °í¸£°Ô ÀÌ·ç¾îÁø´Ù. 4. ¹Ý¸¸¼ºÇü¿¡¼­´Â °¡ÁöÀÇ ½ÅÀå»ýÀåÁß ¼öÆòÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÎÇÏ¿©¾ß¸¸ ÇϺαîÁö ¸Í¾Æ.°³È­½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ°í ½ÅÀå»ýÀåÀÌ ¿Ï·áµÈ ÈÄ¿¡´Â À¯Àο¡ ÀÇÇÑ È¿°ú°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Çö»ó¿¡ ÀÇÇØ °³È­ ¹× ¸Í¾ÆÀ²ÀÇ Áõ°¡´Â Á¤¾Æ¿ì¼¼ÀÇ Å¸ÆÄ¿Í ÇÔ²² ¾ÆÀÇ À¯½Çµµ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ¼­µµ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
This study was to obtain effect of stem leading time and angles on the growing and flowering in climbing rose. The results were as follows : In the rambler type, climber type and pillar type, differences of bud size were decreased between upper ports and lower parts as leading angles were close to the horizon. And bud type was like a long-egg shape. regardless of growing type, differences of stets diameter between upper parts and lower parts were decreased when the angles were leaded horizon. In order to increase rate of shooting and flowering, regardless of leading time, rambler type was shooted in a short period and flowered evenly, from upper to lower parts of stem as leading angles were horizon. But in the case of 45$^{circ}$, the rate of lower parts was nearly zero. In climber type, shooting and flowering was only happened to the lower parts of stem when leaded during growth stage according to leaded horizon. These phenomena are supposed that shooting and flowering rate are influenced by not only apical dominance but degree of bud growth. Meanwhile, pillar type was shooted and flowered evenly to lower parts when the stem was leaded during growth stage or not leaded completely. But in creeper type, there was no connection with the leading. Therefore, this type had better not leaded. Length of flowering stem, regardless of growing type, was equaled when leaded during growth stage according to leaded horizon.
 
Ű¿öµå
 
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.16, no.2, 1988³â, pp.9-21
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO198811920956103)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿