라펜트│카페│블로그│더보기
아카데미 홈 명사특강 대학연구실탐방 조경실무 동영상강의 한국의 전통정원 학회별 논문
학회별 논문

한국건설관리학회
한국건축시공학회
한국도로학회
한국생물환경조절학회
한국생태학회
한국수자원학회
한국식물학회
한국실내디자인학회
한국자원식물학회
한국잔디학회
한국조경학회
한국지반공학회
한국하천호수학회
한국환경생물학회
한국환경생태학회

한국조경학회 / v.32, no.4, 2004년, pp.94-104
AHP 기법을 활용한 경관평가법 작성에 관한 연구 - 경관통제점에서의 평가 -
( A Study on Framing Techniques of Landscape Assessment Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process - The Assessment on the Landscape Control Points - )
서주환;양희승; 경희대학교 예술ㆍ디자인대학;경희대학교 대학원 조경학과;
 
초 록
This study creates the LCP (Landscape Control Point) through the survey of spot sites for the quality of landscape assessment, which is based on an objective and departmentalized data base; the landscape assessment was achieved by production of weight value with the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) technique, selection of requisites for the landscape assessment with the IVERSON method and visual area analysis with GIS (Geographic Information System). Futhermore, validity of the landscape assessment was verified by analysis of the correlation between physical amount and aesthetic amount. The purpose of this study is to suggest the basic essential data for landscape assessment and landscape planning by the characteristics of landscape based on verification of the suggested landscape assessment methods. The results of this study are summarized below. 1. In the adaptation of landscape assessment using GIS, the landscape assessment points of LCP 18, 17 and 16, which have more visible elements such as hill area, mountain area, and forest and farm land, were indicated to be higher than the others. In contrast, the landscape assessment points of LCP 13, 6 and 10, which have less visible elements, were relatively lower than the others. 2. In the visible preference measuring method, LCP 4, 14, and 16 showed high points of landscape assessment with 3.46, 3.4, and 3.18 each. With the more natural environments such as hill area, mountain area, and forest and farm land, higher results were shown. In contrast, LCP 7, 1, and 9 showed low points of landscape assessment with 2.24, 2.36, and 2.53 each. 3. In this study, a coefficient of 0.746 was gained by the analysis of correlation between the points of landscape assessment method and the points of visual preference from a slide show. This has 99 percent of probability in statistical data. 4. In conclusion, with the demonstration of the correlation between the landscape assessment method based on the AHP technique and the aesthetic amount (preference proportion), the practical use of landscape assessment can be demonstrated by the suggested landscape assessment method.
 
키워드
The Landscape Assessment;AHP;LCP;The Visible Preference;Weight;
 
한국조경학회지 / v.32, no.4, 2004년, pp.94-104
한국조경학회
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200416641392049)
언어 : 한국어
논문 제공 : KISTI 한국과학기술정보연구원
목록보기
회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보취급방침 책임의 한계와 법적고지 이메일주소 무단수집 거부 고객센터
   

하위배너이동