|
|
|
한국조경학회 / v.35, no.2, 2007년, pp.71-80 
|
남.북한의 천연기념물 관리제도 비교
( A Comparative Study on the Natural Monument Management Policies of South and North Korea ) |
| 나명하;홍윤순;김학범; 문화재청 천연기념물과;한경대학교 조경학과;한경대학교 조경학과;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| 초 록 |
|
|
| Korea began preserving and managing natural monuments in 1933 under Japanese Colonization, but North Korea and South Korea were forced to establish separate natural monument management policies because of the division after the Korean Independence. The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the natural monument management policies of both south and North Korea between 1933 and 2005 to introduce new policies for Korea unification. The following are the results: First, South Korea manages every type of cultural asset, including natural monuments, through the 'Cultural Heritage Protection Act,' whereas North Korea managing its cultural assets through the 'Cultural Relics Protection Act' and the 'Landmark/Natural Monument Protection Act.' Second, South Korea preserves and utilizes natural monuments for the purpose of promoting the cultural experience of Korean people and contributing to the development of world culture, whereas North Korea uses its natural monuments to promote the superiority of socialism and protect its ruling power. Third, North and South Korea have similar classification systems for animals, plants, and geology, but North Korea classifies geography as one of its natural monuments. Unlike South Korea, North Korea also designates imported animals and plants not only for the preservation and research of genetic resources, but also for their value as economic resources. Fourth, North Korea authorizes the Cabinet to designate and cancel natural monuments, whereas South Korea designates and cancels natural monuments by the Cultural Heritage Administration through the deliberation of a Cultural Heritage Committee. Both Koreas' central administrations establish policies and their local governments carry them out, while their management systems are quite different. In conclusion, it is important to establish specified laws for the conservation of natural heritages and clarified standards of designation in order to improve the preservation and management system and to sustain the diversity of natural preservation. Moreover it is also necessary to discover resources in various fields, designate protection zones, and preserve imported trees. By doing so, we shall improve South Korea's natural monument management policies and ultimately enhance national homogeneity in preparation for the reunification of the Koreas in the future. |
| |
| 키워드 |
| Cultural Heritage Protection Act;Cultural Relics Protection Act;Landmark/Natural Monument Protection Act; |
| |
|
|
|
|
한국조경학회지 / v.35, no.2, 2007년, pp.71-80
한국조경학회
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200724737437984)
언어 : 한국어 |
|
| 논문 제공 : KISTI 한국과학기술정보연구원 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
