¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.37, no.4, 2009³â, pp.94-99
ÇÏÀ̵å·ÎÄÃÃÄ ºÎÇǺñ¿Í È­ºÐ¿ëÅä¿¡ µû¸¥ ½ºÅ²´ä¼­½º, ½Ì°í´½ÀÇ ½Ç³»½Àµµ °³¼±È¿°ú
( Effect of Scindapsus aureus and Syngonium podophyllum on the Improvement in Indoor Humidity by a Difference of Hydoroculture Volume Ratio and Pot Media )
ÁÖÁøÈñ; °Ç±¹´ëÇб³ »ê¸²°úÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÇÏÀ̵å·ÎÄÃÃÄ ½Ç³»³ìÈ­¹æ¹ýÀ» ½Ç³»½Àµµ °³¼±ÀÇ Áß¿äÇÑ ¼ö´ÜÀ¸·Î Ȱ¿ëÇϱâ À§ÇØ, °ü¿±½Ä¹°·Î ¸Å¿ì º¸ÆíÈ­µÈ ½ºÅ²´ä¼­½º(Scindapsus aureus)¿Í ½Ì°í´½(Syngonium podophyllum)À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏÀ̵å·ÎÄÃÃÄ ½ÄÀç ºÎÇǺñÀ²ÀÎ 2%, 3%, 5% Â÷ÀÌ¿Í 3%ÀÇ µ¿ÀÏÇÑ ÇÏÀ̵å·ÎÄÃÃÄ ½ÄÀç´ë¿¡¼­ÀÇ È­ºÐ¿ëÅä, ½Ä¹°Á¾ÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ¿¡ µû¸¥ ½Ç³»½Àµµ º¯È­¸¦ ½ÇÃøÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ±× °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ÇÏÀ̵å·ÎÄÃÃÄ ºÎÇǺñÀ²¿¡ µû¸¥ ½Àµµ º¯È­¿¡ À־ ½ºÅ²´ä¼­½ºÀÇ °æ¿ì, ½Ä¹°ÀÌ ÅõÀÔÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´ø ´ëÁ¶±¸¿¡ ºñÇØ ½Ä¹°ÀÌ ÀÖ´Â »ýÀå»ó ³» »ó´ë½Àµµ°¡ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ƯÈ÷, ½Ä¹°°ú ½ÄÀç´ëÀÇ ¿ëÀûºñÀ²ÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁú¼ö·Ï ½Àµµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁ³´Ù. »ó´ë½Àµµ 25%ÀÎ ´ëÁ¶±¸¿¡ ºñÇØ, 2%´Â 40%¸¦, 3%´Â 45%¸¦, 5%´Â 50%·Î ÃøÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. ½Ì°í´½Àº ÇÏÀ̵å·ÎÄÃÃÄ ºÎÇǺñÀ² 2%´Â 40%¸¦, 3%´Â 44%¸¦, 5%´Â 46%·Î °¢°¢ ³ªÅ¸³»¾î ´ëÁ¶±¸ÀÎ 25%ÀÇ »ó´ë½Àµµº¸´Ù´Â ³ô¾ÒÀ¸³ª ºÎÇǺñÀ²¿¡ µû¸¥ »ó´ë½Àµµ Â÷ÀÌ´Â È®¿¬ÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ÇÏÀ̵å·ÎÄÃÃÄ ½ÄÀç´ë ³»ÀÇ È­ºÐ¿ëÅä¿Í ½Ä¹°Á¾¿¡ µû¸¥ »ó´ë½Àµµ º¯È­¸¦ »ìÆìº¸¸é, ´ëÁ¶±¸ÀÎ ÇÏÀ̵å·Îº¼ ½ÄÀç´ë ³»ÀÇ ÇÏÀ̵å·Îº¼ 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ Ãʱ⠻ó´ë½Àµµ°¡ ´Ù¼Ò ³ô¾ÒÀ¸³ª, ½Ã°£ÀÌ Áö³²¿¡ µû¶ó ¹° ½ÄÀç´ë ³»ÀÇ ÈëÈ­ºÐ 󸮱¸¿Í À¯»çÇÑ ¾à 45%ÀÇ »ó´ë½Àµµ¸¦ À¯ÁöÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹° ½ÄÀç´ë ³»ÀÇ ÇÏÀ̵å·Îº¼ 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ »ó´ë½Àµµ°¡ ¾à 30%·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ÇÏÀ̵å·Îº¼ ½ÄÀç´ë ³»ÀÇ ÇÏÀ̵å·Îº¼ ó¸®ÇÑ »êÈ£¼ö´Â »ó´ë½Àµµ ¾à 38%·Î ÃøÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù.
The purpose of this study was to utilize hydroculture by the vital means of the improvement of indoor relative humidity. This experiment employed a search of the effect of Scindapsus aureus and Syngonium podophyllum that are generalized for hydroculture foliage plant by a difference of volume ratio, pot media and plants species. In the case of Scindapsus aureus, relative humidity was high for growth chamber in which plants presented as opposed to control growth chambers in which there were no plants. Although relative humidity was 25% in control chamber, there was an increase of 40% at a 2% volume ratio, 45% at a 3% volume ratio and 50% at a 5% volume ratio. The relative humidity of Syngonium podophyllum was 40% at a 2% volume ratio, 44% at a 3% volume ratio and 46% at a 5% volume ratio, while the control treatment was 25% relative humidity in hydroculture. Both the control treatment and hydroball pot in a hydroball container were high at first. As time progressed, artificial soil pots in water containers was similar when housed within the control chamber by about 45% relative humidity. Hydroball pots in water container had about 30% relative humidity. Ardisia pusilla of hydroball poIt in hydroball container had about 38% relative humidity.
 
Ű¿öµå
½Ç³»Á¶°æ;¹Ì±âÈÄ;½Ç³»½Ä¹°;ÀΰøÅä;Interior Landscape;Microclimate;Indoor Plants;Artificial Soil;
 
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.37, no.4, 2009³â, pp.94-99
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200908856861721)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿