|
|
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.37, no.4, 2009³â, pp.42-51
|
ÃʵîÇлýµéÀÇ ¸¸Á· À¯ÇüÀ» °í·ÁÇÑ Çб³½£ Á¶¼º¹æÇâ
( The Direction of School Forest Plans Considering Satisfaction of Elementary Students ) |
| Àåö±Ô;Á¤¼º°ü;ÀåÁ¤¼±;±è°æÅÂ;¿ÀÁ¤ÇÐ; °æºÏ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø Á¶°æÇаú;°æºÏ´ëÇб³ Á¶°æÇаú;Æ÷Ç× »ý¸íÀǽ£;°æºÏ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø Á¶°æÇаú;±¹¸³»ê¸²°úÇпø »ê¸²»ýÅ¿¬±¸°ú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| º» ¿¬±¸´Â °æ»óºÏµµ¿¡ ¼ÒÀçÇÏ´Â ÃʵîÇб³ÀÇ Çб³½£ ÇöȲÀ» Á¶»çÇϰí, ÁÖ ÀÌ¿ëÀÚÀÎ ÇлýµéÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¸¸Á·µµ ¼³¹®À» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿© ¸¸Á·À¯Çü¿¡ µû¸¥ Çб³½£ Á¶¼º¹æÇâÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸ °á°ú¸¦ ¿ä¾àÇϸé Çб³½£ÀÇ ¸¸Á·µµ´Â ¼ö¸ñ ¸¹À½ Ç׸ñÀÌ °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò°í, ¼ÒÀ½ °¨¼Ò Ç׸ñÀÌ °¡Àå ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 15°³ÀÇ Ç׸ñº° ¸¸Á·µµ¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¿äÀκм®À» ½Ç½ÃÇÑ °á°ú 3°³ ¿äÀÎÀÌ ÃßÃâµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç °¢°¢ ȯ°æÀû ±â´É, ±³À° ÈÞ°Ô ±â´É, »ýÅÂÀû ±â´ÉÀ¸·Î ¸í¸íÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´ÙÀ½À¸·Î ¿äÀÎ Á¡¼ö¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÇлýµéÀ» 4°³ÀÇ ±ºÁýÀ¸·Î À¯ÇüÈÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× °á°ú, ±ºÁý IÀº ȯ°æÀû ±â´É, ±ºÁý IIIÀº ±³À° ÈÞ°Ô ±â´É, ±ºÁý IV´Â »ýÅÂÀû ±â´ÉÀÇ ¸¸Á·µµ°¡ ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ±ºÁý II´Â 3°³ÀÇ ±â´É¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸¸Á·µµ°¡ ¸ðµÎ ³·Àº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÇлýµéÀÇ ¸¸Á·À¯Çü¿¡ µû¶ó Çб³º° Ư¼ºÀ» »ìÆìº» °á°ú, ±ºÁý II¿¡ ¼ÓÇÏ´Â ÇлýµéÀÌ Àû°í, Ÿ±ºÁýÀÇ ºÐÆ÷°¡ ºñ½ÁÇÑ Çб³Àϼö·Ï Àüü ¸¸Á·µµ°¡ ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Çб³ÀÇ °æ¿ì ¿îµ¿ÀåÀÇ ¸¹Àº ºÎºÐÀ» ½ÄÀç°ø°£À¸·Î Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© Çб³½£ ¸éÀû ¹× ºñÀ²ÀÌ Å¸Çб³¿¡ ºñÇØ Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, üÇè ¹× ±³À° ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ÅëÇØ ÇлýµéÀÇ Âü¿©¸¦ À¯µµÇϰí ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼, Çб³½£À» Á¶¼ºÇÒ °æ¿ì Çб³½£ÀÇ ¾çÀûÀÎ Áõ°¡¿Í ´õºÒ¾î ´Ù¾çÇÑ Ã¼Çè ¹× ±³À° ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ µîÀ» µµÀÔÇÏ¿© ȯ°æÀû, ±³À° ÈÞ°Ô ¹× »ýÅÂÀû ±â´É µî ÇлýµéÀÇ ¸¸Á·¿äÀÎÀ» °í·ÁÇØ¾ß Çϸç, ±âÁ¸ È´Ü¿¡ ¼ö¸ñÀ» Ãß°¡ÇÏ´Â ¹æ½Äº¸´Ù´Â Çб³½£À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °ø¿øÇü ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î Á¶¼ºÇØ¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. |
|
| The purpose of this study is to analyze the actual conditions of school forests using a field survey and to establish the construction methods considering satisfactions of students using a satisfaction inquiry. The results of the this study are as follows: many trees had the highest score whereas reduction of noise had the lowest score in the satisfaction analysis of 15 items. According to the result of the factor analysis, 3 factors were determined to be most important from 15 items of satisfaction, and they were Environmental Function, Educational and Recreational Function, and Ecological Function. Next, students were classified into 4 groups using factor scores by cluster analysis. Group I had very high effectiveness in the Environmental Function and group II had low effectiveness in all factors. Also, group III had very high effectiveness in the Educational and Recreational Function, and group IV had very high effectiveness in the Ecological Function. According to the analysis results of the character of the school on students' group, the satisfaction of school forests was high when students of group II were few and other group's students were similar. As these schools use a lot of parts of the playground for green space, there was more school forest than at other schools. Also, students of these schools were experiencing the school forest through educational programs. Therefore, school forests should be constructed by increasing the green area and considering the satisfaction factors of students through various experience and education programs and by the way utilizing wide space than adding the tree in the garden. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| µµ½Ã½£;¸¸Á·¿äÀÎ;ȯ°æ±³À°;³ìÁö;Urban Forest;Satisfaction Factor;Environmental Education;Green Space; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.37, no.4, 2009³â, pp.42-51
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200908856861710)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|