¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.36, no.4, 2008³â, pp.48-64
°æ°ü»ýŰèȹ ¸ðÇü¼³Á¤À» À§ÇÑ ±âÃÊÀû ¿¬±¸
( A Basic Study on Establishment of the Ecological Landscape Planning Model )
³ªÁ¤È­;Á¶ÇöÁÖ;ÀÌÇöÅÃ; °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Á¶°æÇаú;°æºÏ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø Á¶°æÇаú;°æºÏ´ëÇб³ Á¶°æÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â °¢Á¾ ´ë±Ô¸ð °³¹ß»ç¾÷ ¹× ³­ °³¹ß µî¿¡¼­ ¾ß±âµÇ´Â °æ°üÈÑ¼Õ ¹®Á¦¸¦ º¸´Ù ´õ È¿°úÀûÀ¸·Î ´ëÀÀÇØ ³ª°¥ ¼ö Àִ ü°èÈ­µÈ °æ°ü»ýŰèȹ ¸ðÇüÀ» ¼³Á¤Çϴµ¥ °¡Àå Å« ÀÇÀǸ¦ µÎ¾ú´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ¸ÕÀú ±¹³» ¿Ü ¹®ÇåºÐ¼® °á°ú, °æ°ü»ýŰèȹ ¸ðÇü¼³Á¤À» À§ÇÑ °èȹÁöÇ¥ Ç׸ñÀº ÀÚ¿¬º¸È£Áö¿ªÀÇ ¼³Á¤, ½ÀÁö ºñ¿ÀÅéÀÇ °ü¸® ¹× Á¶¼º µî ÃÑ 60°³·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. À̵éÀ» ¹°¸®Àû ÁöÇ¥ Ç׸ñ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î Àç¼³Á¤ÇÑ °á°ú ÃÖÁ¾ÀûÀ¸·Î ¼±Á¤µÈ °èȹÁöÇ¥ Ç׸ñÀº ÃÑ 34°³·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. »ç·ÊÁö ÇöÀåÁ¶»ç °á°ú, ÃÑ 17°÷ÀÇ »ç·ÊÁö ³»¿¡´Â ¹®ÇåºÐ¼®¿¡¼­ µµÃâµÈ 34°³ÀÇ °èȹÁöÇ¥µé ¸ðµÎ°¡ ÃâÇöÇϰí ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ÇöÀåÁ¶»ç °úÁ¤¿¡¼­ Ãß°¡µÈ °èȹÁöÇ¥ Ç׸ñ 4°³¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÏ¿© ÃÖÁ¾ ¼±Á¤µÈ °èȹÁöÇ¥ Ç׸ñÀº ÃÑ 38°³·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¼¼ºÎ °èȹÁöÇ¥µéÀÇ Á߿䵵 ºÐ¼® °á°ú, ´ëºÎºÐ 5Á¡ ÀÌ»óÀ¸·Î ºñ±³Àû ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ÀÚ¿¬º¸È£Áö¿ª ¼³Á¤, °æ°üº¸È£Áö¿ª ¼³Á¤ µîÀº Á߿䵵 °ªÀÌ 6.2 ÀÌ»óÀ¸·Î ¸Å¿ì ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ¼¼ºÎ °èȹÁöÇ¥ Ư¼ºº° À¯ÇüÈ­¸¦ À§ÇØ ¿äÀκм®À» ¼öÇàÇÑ °á°ú, '±ÙÀÚ¿¬Çü »ý¹°¼­½Ä°ø°£ÀÇ ¼³Ä¡, º¹±¸ ¹× °ü¸®' µî ÃÑ 7°³ÀÇ ¿äÀÎÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ»ó°ú °°Àº ¼¼ºÎ °èȹÁöÇ¥ Ç׸ñÀÇ À¯ÇüÈ­ °á°ú ¹× Á߿䵵 °á°ú °ªÀ» Á¾ÇÕ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© 1Â÷ °æ°ü»ýŰèȹ ¸ðÇüÀ» ¼³Á¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 1Â÷ ¸ðÇüÀ» ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿© Á» ´õ ü°èÀûÀÎ °æ°ü»ýŰèȹ ¸ðÇüÀ» ±¸ÃàÇϱâ À§ÇØ 'ÃÖ»ó °ª ¼±ÅÃÀ» À§ÇÑ ´ÙÁߺñ±³(MCB)' ºÐ¼®À» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. 5°¡Áö·Î ºÐ·ùµÈ °èȹÁöÇ¥ ±ºº° MCB ºÐ¼® °á°ú, °¢°¢ÀÇ °èȹÁöÇ¥±º ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ ÃÖ»ó °ªÀÌ È®¿¬È÷ µå·¯³ª°í ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ» È®ÀÎÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. º¸ÀüÁö¿ª, º¸¿ÏÁö¿ª µî ÃÑ 9°¡Áö·Î ¼³Á¤µÈ °èȹÀÇ ±âº»¹æÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á߿䵵 ºÐ¼® °á°ú, Æò±Õ Á߿䵵 ÂüÀº º¸ÀüÁö¿ª°ú º¸¿ÏÁö¿ªÀÌ °¢°¢ 4.62¿Í 4.54·Î ¸Å¿ì ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÀÌ»ó°ú °°Àº 1Â÷ ¸ðÇü, MCB ºÐ¼® ¹× °èȹÀÇ ±âº»¹æÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á߿䵵 ºÐ¼® °á°ú¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÇÏ¿© 2Â÷ °æ°ü»ýŰèȹ ¸ðÇüÀ» ¼³Á¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î ¼öÁ÷Àû Àüȯ°ü°è ºÐ¼®¿¡¼­ ÀÏ·Ê·Î 'º¸ÀüÁö¿ª'ÀÇ °æ¿ì ÈÞ¾ç°ø°£ Á¶¼ºÀ» Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ¸ðµç °èȹÁöÇ¥±º¿¡¼­ 5.2 ÀÌ»óÀÇ ³ôÀº Á߿䵵 °ªÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ¼öÆòÀû ¿¬°ü¼º ºÐ¼®ÀÇ °æ¿ì 'Ãß°¡Àû °³¼±, °ü¸® ¹× ¿¬°áÁ¶Ä¡'¿Í Ÿ °èȹÁöÇ¥±º°úÀÇ ¿¬°ü¼º Á¤µµ´Â 5.3 ÀÌ»óÀ¸·Î ¸ðµÎ ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ƯÈ÷ 'ÀÚ¿¬°ú °æ°üÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ Æ¯º°È÷ º¸È£µÇ¾î¾ß ÇÒ ºÎºÐ'°úÀÇ ¿¬°ü¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ Á߿䵵´Â 6.07·Î °¡Àå ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
The aim of this research is to set a systemic Ecological Landscape Planning Model to cope with the destroyed landscape problems which was caused by massive development project and thoughtless development in country areas. The summary of research result are as follows. As a result of analysis on domestic and international literature, there are 60 planning index items which are nature conservation area, landscape conservation area, and build and manage wetland biotope and so on. total number of planning index is 34 after finalizing the physical index items. As a result of on-spot research, all 34 planning index after literature analysis is existing. Also, there are 38 finally-selected index which includes 4 added planning index in the process of research like natural vegetation in frequently-used spot. As a result of importance analysis on detailed planning index, most are above 5 points, which is relatively high. As a result of factor analysis on patterning for the detailed planning index, it was classified with seven elements. The first Ecological Landscape Planning model was set with integrated analysis on result of pattering for the detailed planning index and importance of detailed planning index. Based on first model, to make more systematic landscape, the analysis of MCB was conducted. As a result of MCB analysis according to planning index, it is confirmed that each planning index shows maximum. As a result of importance analysis on the 9 plans keynote, the average importance point was 4.62 for conservation area and 4.54 for enrichment area respectively. By integrating the result of importance analysis on basic aims of the first model, MCB analysis and plans, we set the second Ecological Landscape Planning model. In vertical transition, for example, 'conservation area' showed the importance point above 5.2 for all planning index except setting recreational space. Also, the analysis on parallel structure showed that relation between 'additional improvement, management, and connection' and other planning index is above 5.3 and importance on correlation with 'the part which should be protected from nature and landscape' marked 6.07 which is the highest.
 
Ű¿öµå
°æ°ü¹®Á¦;°èȹÁöÇ¥;MCB ºÐ¼®;°èȹÀÇ ±âº»¹æÇâ;Landscape Problems;Planning Index Items;MCB Analysis;Plans Keynote;
 
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.36, no.4, 2008³â, pp.48-64
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200801440608936)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿