|
|
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.36, no.4, 2008³â, pp.83-99
|
°³ÀÎÂ÷ ôµµ¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ µµ½Ã À̹ÌÁö ÀÎÁö °æÇâ ¿¬±¸ - ¼º³²½Ã¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î -
( Scaling of the Individual Differences to Cognize the Image of the City - Focusing on Seong-Nam- ) |
| º¯Àç»ó; ½Å±¸´ëÇРȯ°æÁ¶°æ°ú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| ¼º³²½Ã´Â ±¸ ½Ã°¡Áö¿Í ½Å½Ã°¡ÁöÀÇ ÀÔÁö Ư¼ºÀ̳ª °æÁ¦ ±¸Á¶ µî ¿©·¯ °¡Áö Á¶°Ç¿¡ µû¶ó µµ½ÃÀÇ À̹ÌÁö°¡ ¸Å¿ì ´Ù¸£°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â µµ½ÃÀÌ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ¼ºº°, ¿¬·Éº°, Áö¿ªº°, ±â°£º°·Î µµ½Ã À̹ÌÁöÀÇ ÀÎÁö °æÇâÀÌ ¾î¶°ÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌ´ÂÁö¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÁøÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ƯÈ÷ INDSCALÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© µµ½Ã À̹ÌÁö¸¦ Æò°¡Çϰí ÀÎÁöÇÏ´Â °æÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ¿¬±¸¿¡ ÃÊÁ¡À» ¸ÂÃß¾úÀ¸¸ç, INDSCALÀÇ À¯¿ë¼ºÀ» ÀÔÁõÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© »çÀü¿¡ °¢Á¾ Åë°èÀûÀÎ °ËÁõ ÀýÂ÷¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿© Àü¹ÝÀûÀÎ °æÇâÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ ÀÔÁõÇØ º¸¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇØ µµÃâµÈ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°ÀÌ ¿ä¾àµÈ´Ù. 1. ¼º³²½Ã¹ÎµéÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ½Ç½ÃÇÑ ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¿¡¼ ¼º³²½Ã ÀüüÀÇ »ó¡¹°Àº ³²Çѻ꼺ÀÌ °¡Àå µÎµå·¯Áö°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ±× µÚ¸¦ À̾î À²µ¿°ø¿ø°ú ºÐ´ç°ø¿ø, ¼Çö¿ª, ¸ð¶õ½ÃÀå µîÀÌ ¼ø¼´ë·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °æÇâÀº ºÎºÐÀûÀÎ Â÷À̸¸ Á¸ÀçÇÒ »Ó, ¼±È£ Àå¼Ò¸¦ ¼±ÅÃÇÏ´Â °æÇâ¿¡¼µµ À¯»çÇÏ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 2. »ó¡¹°°ú ¼±È£ Àå¼ÒÀÇ ¼±Åà °æÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© °³ÀÎÂ÷¿¡ ±Ù°ÅÇÑ Åë°èÀû Â÷À̸¦ °ËÁõÇØ º» °á°ú, ¼ºº°À̳ª ¿¬·Éº°, ±â°£º°·Î´Â Å« Â÷À̰¡ ³ªÅ¸³ªÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Áö¿ªº°·Î´Â ÀÚ½ÅÀÌ °ÅÁÖÇÏ´Â Áö¿ªÀÇ ·£µå¸¶Å©¸¦ ´õ¿í °ÇÏ°Ô ÀÎÁöÇϰí ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. 3. ¼º³²½Ã Àüü¿Í »ó¡¹° ¹× ±¸ ½Ã°¡Áö, ½Å½Ã°¡Áö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ MDS¸¦ ÅëÇØ, ¼º³²½ÃÀÇ ÀüüÀûÀÎ À̹ÌÁö°¡ ƯÀÌÇÑ Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ÇüŸ¦ º¸À̰í ÀÖÀ½À» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, °¢°¢ÀÇ Áö¿ªº° À̹ÌÁö´Â ÇØ´ç Áö¿ªÀÇ »ó¡¹°°ú À¯»çÇÏ°Ô ºÐÆ÷µÇ´Â Ư¡ÀÌ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ÇÑÆí, ´Ù¸¥ µµ½Ã¿ÍÀÇ À̹ÌÁö Æ÷Áö¼Å´×¿¡¼´Â ¼º³²½Ã ÀüüÀÇ À̹ÌÁö°¡ ±¸ ½Ã°¡Áö¿Í ¸Å¿ì Èí»çÇÏ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ª°í ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ½Å½Ã°¡ÁöÀÇ À̹ÌÁö´Â ¼º³²½Ã ÀüüÀÇ À̹ÌÁö¿Í ¸Å¿ì »ó¹ÝµÇ¾î ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â °á°ú¸¦ º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. 4. INDSCALÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© °³Àκ°·Î µµ½Ã À̹ÌÁö Æò°¡ °æÇâÀ» »ìÆìº» °á°ú, ³²ÀÚ¿Í ¿©ÀÚ´Â µµ½Ã À̹ÌÁö¸¦ Æò°¡Çϴµ¥ ÀÖ¾î¼ Àǹ̳ª °¡ÁßÄ¡¸¦ ¼·Î ´Ù¸£°Ô µÎ°í ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Áï, ³²ÀÚÀÇ °æ¿ì ¿ª»ç¼º¿¡ °ÇÑ Àǹ̸¦ ºÎ¿©ÇÏ´Â ¹Ý¸é, ¿©ÀÚÀÇ °æ¿ì´Â ¼±È£¼ºÀ̳ª ±Ô¸ð¼º¿¡ °¡ÁßÄ¡¸¦ µÎ°í µµ½Ã¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÇÑÆí, ¿¬·ÉÀ̳ª Áö¿ª, ±â°£º°·Î´Â µµ½Ã À̹ÌÁö¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â °æÇâ¿¡ ÀÖ¾î¼ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê°í ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, °µµ¿¡¼¸¸ ºÎºÐÀûÀ¸·Î Â÷À̸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼ µµÃâµÈ µµ½ÃÀÇ À̹ÌÁö ºÐ¼®±â¹ýÀº °æ°ü°èȹ ¹× °ü¸®¸¦ À§ÇÑ ±âÃÊ ÀÚ·á·Î Ȱ¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ̸ç, °³ÀÎÂ÷¿¡ ±Ù°ÅÇÑ µµ½Ã À̹ÌÁöÀÎÁö °æÇâÀÇ ÆÄ¾ÇÀº ÇâÈÄ Áö¼ÓµÉ °ü·Ã ¿¬±¸ÀÇ Á¶»çÇ׸ñ ¹× ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¹æÇ⼺ Á¦°ø¿¡ ±â¿©ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ¸·¿¬È÷ ÀÎÁ¤µÇ¾î ¿Ô´ø °³ÀÎÂ÷¿¡ ±Ù°ÅÇÑ µµ½Ã À̹ÌÁöÀÇ ÀÎÁö °æÇâ Â÷À̸¦ °úÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇØ º½À¸·Î½á, µµ½Ã À̹ÌÁö³ª »ó¡À̶ó´Â ºÎºÐÀ» µµ½Ã °èȹ°ú ¼³°è¿¡ Á÷Á¢ ÀÀ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï Àüȯ½ÃŰ´Â ½Ç¿ëÀûÀÎ µµ±¸¸¦ ¸¶·ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù´Âµ¥ ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ÀÇÀǰ¡ ÀÖ´Ù. |
|
| Images of Seong-Nam appears different according to diverse conditions. This study was intended to analyze the differences of cognition by personal characteristics such as age, gender, location, and period when an individual evaluates an urban image. This research focused on the interpretation of the visualized results from Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) and Individual Difference Scaling (INDSCAL) with two questionnaires. This study can be summarized as follows: 1. Namhan Sansung was ranked as the first symbolic property by citizens in Seong-Nam. Next was Yuldong Park, followed by Bundang Central Park, Seohyun Station including Samsung Plaza, and, finally, Moran Market. This trend also similarly appeared in the selection of preferred places. 2. There were no statistical differences in trends of choice of symbolic landmarks and preferred places according to age, gender, and period; however, there were meaningful differences according to location. 3. The total image of Seong-Nam was positioned to be separated from images of other districts and landmarks on the image spatial plot by MDS; however, images of the old and new district were plotted close to symbolic landmarks where located around each district. 4. INDSCAL illustrated that men weighted the historical meaning while women weighted preference and city size when evaluating an urban image. On the other hand, there was no difference in cognitive trends according to age, location, and period. Until now, an individual difference in the cognition and evaluation of an urban image was a socially accepted notion. However, this study verified the difference according to personal characteristics and developed a practical tool to analyze an individual cognition trend about a city image. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| µµ½Ã Á¤Ã¼¼º;°³Àμº°Ý;À̹ÌÁö ºÐÆ÷µµ;°æ°ü;·£µå¸¶Å©;City Identity;Personal Character;Image Positioning;Visual Landscape;Landmarks; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.36, no.4, 2008³â, pp.83-99
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200801440608946)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|