¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.36, no.4, 2008³â, pp.100-110
¹®È­Àç°ü¶÷·áÀÇ ÁöºÒÀǻ翡 ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °áÁ¤¿äÀÎ ¹× ¼³µæÈ¿°ú
( Effects of Determinants and Persuasion on the Willingness-to-Pay of the Cultural and Heritage Assets' Admission Fee within the National Parks )
¹ÚÁ¾±¸; µ¿±¹´ëÇб³ È£ÅÚ°ü±¤°æ¿µÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¹®È­Àç°ü¶÷·áÀÇ ÁöºÒÀǻ翡 ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¹®È­Àç°ü¶÷·áÀÇ °¡°ÝÁ¤Ã¥¿¡ °ü·ÃµÈ °áÁ¤¿äÀΰú ¹®È­ÀçÇØ¼³»çÀÇ »çÂû¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø ±×¸®°í ¼³µæ¸Þ½ÃÁöÀÇ À¯Çüº° È¿°ú¸¦ »ìÆìº¸¾Ò´Ù. ÃÖ±Ù ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀ» ¹æ¹®ÇÑ Å½¹æ°´µéÀº ¹®È­Àç°ü¶÷·á¿¡ °üÇØ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ »çȸÀû ¹Ý°¨°ú »çȸÀû ÀúÇ×°¨À» °¡Áö°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ´õ ³ª¾Æ°¡ ¹®È­Àç°ü¶÷·áÀÇ Â¡¼ö ÀÚü¸¦ °ÅºÎÇϰí ÀÖ´Â ½ÇÁ¤À̱⿡ ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇØ°áÃ¥ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ½ÃÁ¡ÀÌ´Ù. °è·æ»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀ» ¹æ¹®ÇÑ 302¸íÀÇ °ø¿øÅ½¹æ°´À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼³¹®Á¶»ç°¡ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ³´Ù. ÁÖµÈ Åë°èÀû ºÐ¼®Àº ´ÙÁßȸ±ÍºÐ¼®°ú ÀÌ¿øº¯·® ºÐ»êºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇØ ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú¿¡ µû¸£¸é ù°·Î, ½Å¿ëÄ«µå·Î ³³ºÎÅä·Ï Çϴ ¡¼ö¹æ½ÄÀÇ °³¼±ÀÌ p<0.05¼öÁØ¿¡¼­ Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î °¡Àå À¯ÀÇÇÑ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ¹®È­ÀçÇØ¼³»çÀÇ »óÁÖ, »çÂûÀÔÀå·á¿Í ÁÖÂ÷ºñÀÇ ÇÕµ¿Â¡¼ö, ¸Å¿ù ÆòÀÏÀÇ »çÂûÀÇ ¹«·á°³¹æ µîÀÌ ¹®È­Àç°ü¶÷·áÀÇ ÁöºÒÀǻ翡 À¯ÀÇÇÑ ¿µÇâ·ÂÀ» ¹ÌÃÆ´Ù. µÑ°·Î, ¹®È­Àç°ü¶÷·á¿¡ ´ëÇØ °¡Àå »çȸÀû ÀúÇ×°¨ÀÌ ³·Àº ¼³µæ¸Þ½ÃÁö À¯ÇüÀº ¹®È­Àç°ü¶÷·á¸¦ ¹Ì·¡ ¼¼´ë¸¦ À§ÇÑ ¹®È­ÀçÀÇ À¯Áö º¸¼ö¿¡ »ç¿ëÇϰڴٴ ³»¿ëÀ» °­Á¶ÇÑ °ÍÀÌ Å½¹æ°´¿¡°Ô °¡Àå ³ôÀº ¼³µæÈ¿°ú¸¦ ÁÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ¹®È­Àç°ü¶÷·á¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »çȸÀû ÀúÇ×°¨À» ÁÙÀ̱â À§Çؼ­´Â ¹®È­ÀçÀÇ º¸Á¸À» °­Á¶ÇÏ´Â Æ÷½ºÅͳª ½ºÆ¼Ä¿¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¸ÅÇ¥¼Ò¿¡¼­ Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î Ž¹æ°´À» ¼³µæÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ °¡Àå È¿°úÀûÀÏ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
The purposes of the study were to analyze the effects of determinants and persuasive messages on the willingness-to-pay cultural & heritage assets' admission fees. Recently visitors have responded to a nationwide boycott of the fees within national parks due to feelings of disapproval and resentment. Data were collected through onsite surveys of 302 visitors in the Mt. Gyeryong National Park. Regression analysis and two-way ANOVA were employed to obtain the results. The results indicate that credit card payment was the most prominent predictor of willingness-to-pay at the .05 level. The second highest coefficient was obtained in the condition levying of admission fees and parking fees at the same time, providing temple interpretive services, followed by free days for everyone on special days each month. In addition, the most persuasive message was the descriptive content, which stated that fees were profoundly committed to the protection of the cultural heritage for future generations. As a result, it is effective to continually persuade visitors to use posters or reminders that stress the preservation of cultural assets at the entrance gate.
 
Ű¿öµå
¼³µæ¸Þ½ÃÁö;»çÂû¼­ºñ½º;¹®È­À¯»êÀÇ º¸Àü;Persuasive Message;Temple Services;Protection of the Cultural Heritage;
 
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.36, no.4, 2008³â, pp.100-110
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200801440608949)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿