|
|
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.38, no.3, 2010³â, pp.75-82
|
°æ°ü½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ÇÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ µµ½Ã±³·®ÀÇ ½Ã°¢Àû Ư¼º Æò°¡ - °æÀǼ± Æóö±¸°£ ¾çÈ·Î Áö¿ªÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î -
( Assessment of Visual Characteristics of Urban Bridges using Landscape Simulations - A Case Study of Yanghwaro in the Gyeongui Railroad Area - ) |
| õÇöÁø;±è¼º±Õ; ¼¿ï´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø;¼¿ï´ëÇб³ Á¶°æ.Áö¿ª½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇкÎ;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| º» ¿¬±¸´Â °æÀǼ± Æóö±¸°£ °ø¿øÈ »ç¾÷ ±¸°£ Áß ¾çÈ·Î Áö¿ªÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î °æ°ü½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ÇÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© µµ½Ã±³·®°æ°üÀÇ ½Ã°¢Àû Ư¼ºÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ³í¹®µéÀº ¼±È£µµ Æò°¡¸¦ ÅëÇØ¼ ¼³°è¹æÇ⸸À» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´À» »Ó ±³·® ½Ã°ø ½Ã ½ÇÁúÀûÀÎ °æ°ü ¼³°è¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »ç·Ê ¹× ¼³°è°úÁ¤¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸ µîÀº ÀÌ·ç¾îÁöÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹®Á¦Á¡À¸·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© ½ÇÁ¦·Î Á÷Á¢ÀûÀÎ ±³·® °æ°ü ¼³°è¿¡ Ȱ¿ëÇϱ⿡´Â ¹ÌÈíÇÏ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ±³·® ½Ã°øÀÌ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁú °¡´É¼ºÀÌ ÀÖ´Â ´ë»óÁö¸¦ ã¾Æ¼ ÁÖÀ§ ȯ°æ°ú ±³·® Çü½Ä¿¡ µû¸¥ ±³·®°æ°üÀÇ À̹ÌÁö¸¦ Æò°¡Çϰí, ¼±È£µµ¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ±³·® °æ°ü¼³°è ½Ã ÀÌ¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ ÀÌ·ÐÀû ±âÃÊÀڷḦ Á¦½ÃÇϴµ¥ ±× ÀÇÀǸ¦ ãÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. °æ°ü½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ǿ¡ »ç¿ëµÈ ¹è°æ°æ°üÀº µµ½Ã°æ°üÀÌ¸ç ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ÇÀ» ÇÒ ´ë»ó±³·®Àº °Å´õ±³, ¾ÆÄ¡±³, Æ®·¯½º±³, »çÀå±³, Çö¼ö±³ 5°³ÀÇ ±³·® À¯ÇüÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´ë»ó±³·®Àº ¼³°èµµ¸éÀ» ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿© ±³·®ÇüŸ¦ ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, À¯ÇüÀÇ ÇüÅ´ °¢ ±³·®À¯Çü¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÏ°í ±× Æ¯¼ºÀÌ ¶Ñ·ÇÇϸ鼵µ ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ ÇüÅ·Π¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú¸¦ ¿ä¾àÇØ º¸¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ¹è°æ°æ°ü¿¡ °Å´õ±³¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ³ª¸ÓÁö ±³·®À» µµÀÔÇÏ¸é ½Ã°¢Àû ¼±È£¿¡ ±àÁ¤ÀûÀÎ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. ¼±Á¤µÈ ¹è°æ°æ°üÀÇ À̹ÌÁö Æò°¡¿¡¼´Â 'ÀΰøÀûÀÎ' À̹ÌÁö°¡ ³ô°Ô Æò°¡µÈ °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. °Å´õ±³ µµÀÔ°æ°üÀÇ À̹ÌÁö Æò°¡¿¡¼´Â '¾ÈÁ¤ÇÑ', 'Áú¼ÀÖ´Â' À̹ÌÁö°¡ ³ô°Ô Æò°¡µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ¾ÆÄ¡±³ µµÀÔ°æ°üÀÇ À̹ÌÁö Æò°¡¿¡¼´Â '¾ÈÁ¤ÇÑ', '¾Æ¸§´Ù¿î', 'Áú¼ÀÖ´Â', 'Èï¹Ì·Î¿î' À̹ÌÁö°¡ ³ô°Ô Æò°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù. Æ®·¯½º±³ µµÀÔ°æ°ü À̹ÌÁö Æò°¡¿¡¼´Â '¾Æ¸§´Ù¿î', '¾ÈÁ¤ÇÑ', 'Áú¼ÀÖ´Â' À̹ÌÁö°¡ ³ô°Ô Æò°¡µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, »çÀå±³ µµÀÔ°æ°ü À̹ÌÁö Æò°¡¿¡¼´Â 'ÀÚ¿¬ÀûÀÎ', 'Á¶È·Î¿î', 'Áú¼ÀÖ´Â' À̹ÌÁö¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ³ª¸ÓÁö À̹ÌÁö¿¡¼ ³ô°Ô Æò°¡µÈ °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. ±×¸®°í Çö¼ö±³´Â 'ÀÚ¿¬ÀûÀÎ' À̹ÌÁö¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ¸ðµç ¸é¿¡¼ ³ôÀº Æò°¡¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. ±³·®¼³°è ½Ã ±³·®ÇüŰ¡ ÁÖº¯ ȯ°æÀÇ ½Ã°¢Àû ¼±È£µµ¿¡ ³ôÀº ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, °æ°ü¼³°è ½Ã ±³·®ÇüÅÂ¿Í ÁÖº¯ ȯ°æÀ» ÇÔ²² °í·ÁÇÑ °æ°ü°èȹÀÇ ¼ö¸³ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â °æ°ü¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±³·®ÇüÅ ¸¸À» ¿¬±¸ÇÏ¿´À¸³ª, ¾ÈÁ¤¼º, °æÁ¦¼º, ½Ã°ø¼º µî ±³·®¼³°è ½Ã ¿©·¯ °¡Áö Áß¿äÇÑ º¯¼öµéÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇϹǷΠÃßÈÄ ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â À̵é°ú ÇÔ²² º¹ÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®, ¿¬±¸µÇ¾î ÀûÀýÇÑ ±³·®ÇüŰ¡ ¼±Á¤µÉ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ÇØ¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. |
|
| This study formed an estimation of the visual characteristics of urban bridges in Yanghwaro in the Gyeongui Railroad Area using a landscape simulation. Existing theses have formerly only suggested directions for design based on visual preference, but there is as yet no research on the practical process of landscape design. As a result, it is difficult to directly apply this to bridge design. This study found a potential bridge site and presented a direction for bridge design in order to improve the image of the surrounding urban landscape by surveying the visual effects and landscape preferences of different bridge types. An urban landscape was produced using a landscape simulation model and was made the background for the survey. Five bridge types--Girder, Arch, Truss, Cable and Suspension--were selected and presented. The shapes of the bridges were selected based on the floor plan. The results of this study are as follows. In a preference analysis, every bridge except Girder was evaluated as a positive influence. When rating the image, 'artificial' was rated significantly higher than other traits when assessing the background image. When the Girder Bridge was introduced, 'stable' and 'orderly' were both rated highly while 'stable', 'beautiful', 'orderly' and 'interesting' were high with the introduction of the Arch Bridge. 'Beautiful', 'stable', and 'orderly' were given a high value in the introduction of the Truss Bridge and every image except 'natural', 'harmony' and 'orderly' were highly rated in the introduction of the Cable Bridge. Further, every image but 'natural' was highly rated with the introduction of the Suspension Bridge. Based on the analysis of the landscape, there is a difference in preference before and after modeling a bridge type, while the bridge itself is an influence when it is the main object of the simulated scene. This study researched only the shape of the bridge as a part of the landscape but other elements such as stability, economics, and construction are also factors in the design of a bridge. Stability, economics, construction and other factors must be considered when selecting a bridge type in the future. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| ±³·®;µµ½Ã°æ°ü;°æ°ü°èȹ;Bridge;Urban Landscape; Landscape Plan; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.38, no.3, 2010³â, pp.75-82
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201033359735782)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|