|
|
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.38, no.2, 2010³â, pp.53-63
|
´ëÀü½Ã »ó¡¹°°ú µµ½Ã À̹ÌÁö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®
( An Analysis of the Comparison between the Image of the Landmarks in Daejeon ) |
| º¯Àç»ó;±è´ë¼ö;ÀÌÁ¤¼ö; ½Å±¸´ëÇРȯ°æÁ¶°æ°ú;Çýõ´ëÇÐ µµ½Ãȯ°æÁ¶°æ°ú;Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ °ÇÃàÇаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| µµ½ÃÀÇ ¹Ì·¡ ¸ð½ÀÀ» °áÁ¤ÇÏ´Â µµ½Ã°æ°ü°èȹÀÇ ´Ü°è¿¡¼ µµ½Ã À̹ÌÁö°¡ ¾î¶»°Ô Æò°¡µÇ°í Àִ°¡¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ÇÑ µµ½Ã À̹ÌÁö Çü¼º ¹æÇâÀ» ¼³Á¤ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÑ ¼±Çà°úÁ¦°¡ µÈ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ½Ã¹ÎµéÀÌ ÁÖü°¡ µÇ¾î µµ½ÃÀÇ À̹ÌÁö¸¦ ¾î¶»°Ô ÀÎÁöÇÏ°í Æò°¡ÇÏ´ÂÁö¸¦ ´ÙÂ÷¿øÃ´µµ¹ý°ú ´ëÀÀÀÏÄ¡ºÐ¼®À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °è·®ÀûÀ¸·Î ¿¬±¸Çϴµ¥ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ³ª¾Æ°¡ Àü¹®°¡¿Í °ü·Ã °ø¹«¿øµéÀÇ ÀÎÁö °æÇâÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇÔÀ¸·Î½á, µµ½Ã À̹ÌÁö Çâ»ó¿¡ ±â¿©ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Á¤·®ÈµÈ Á¤Ã¥ ¹æÇâ ¼³Á¤¿¡ µµ¿òÀÌ µÇ°íÀÚ ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇØ µµÃâµÈ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. 1. ´ëÀü½Ã À̹ÌÁö´Â ÁÖ·Î ¿ª»ç¼º, ¿ªµ¿¼º, ±Ô¸ð¼º µî¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Æò°¡µÇ´Â °æÇâÀÌ °ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±âÁØ¿¡ µû¶ó ´ëÀü½Ã´Â ÀüüÀûÀ¸·Î »õ·Ó°í º¯ÈÇÏ´Â À̹ÌÁö°¡ °ÇÑ µµ½Ã·Î ÀνĵǾúÀ¸¸ç, °ø¹«¿øµé¿¡°Ô´Â ¼Ò¹ÚÇÑ ´À³¦ÀÇ µµ½Ã, Àü¹®°¡µé¿¡°Ô´Â Æò¹üÇÑ ´À³¦ÀÇ µµ½Ã·Î Àνĵǰí ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼ ¼Ò¹ÚÇÏ°í Æò¹üÇÑ À̹ÌÁö¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ´ëÀü½Ã Á¤Ã¼¼º°ú °³¼ºÀ» ã´Âµ¥ º¸´Ù ³ë·ÂÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. 2. ´ëÀü½ÃÀÇ À̹ÌÁö¿¡ ¸¹Àº ¿µÇâÀ» ³¢Ä¡´Â »ó¡¹° ȤÀº »ó¡ÀûÀÎ °ø°£À¸·Î´Â °©ÃµÀ̳ª µÐ»ê ½Åµµ½É, ´ë´ö¿¬±¸´ÜÁö µîÀ» µé ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© À¯¼º¿Âõ°ú ¿øµµ½É, ¿¢½ºÆ÷ °ø¿ø µîÀº ´ëÀü½Ã¿Í À̹ÌÁö°¡ Å©°Ô ´Ù¸£°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ª°í ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó ´ëÀü½ÃÀÇ À̹ÌÁö¸¦ Èñ¼®½ÃŰ´Â ³«ÈÄµÈ ½Ã¼³°ú »ó¡¹°µéÀÇ Çö´ëÀû ¸®¸ðµ¨¸µÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. 3. µµ½Ã À̹ÌÁöÀÇ ¼±È£µµ¸¦ ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¡®ÁÁÀº-½ÈÀº¡¯ÀÇ Çü¿ë»ç À̹ÌÁöÀÇ °æ¿ì, ÀϹÝÀΰú Àü¹®°¡µé¿¡°Ô À־ ¸ðµÎ ½È¾îÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀ» ³ªÅ¸³ª°í ÀÖ¾úÀ¸³ª, °ø¹«¿øµéÀº ÁÁ¾ÆÇÏ´Â À̹ÌÁö¸¦ Áö´Ï°í ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼, ¼¼ Áý´Ü ¸ðµÎ ÁÁ¾ÆÇÏ´Â µÐ»ê ½Åµµ½ÉÀ̳ª ´ë´ö¿¬±¸´ÜÁö µî°ú °°Àº Çö´ëÀû ÷´Ü»ê¾÷ÀÇ À̹ÌÁö¸¦ Åõ¿µ½Ãų Çʿ䰡 ÀÖ´Ù. 4. ´ëÀÀÀÏÄ¡ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÑ À̹ÌÁö ºÐÆ÷µµ¿¡¼ ´ëÀü½Ã´Â ÇàÁ¤µµ½Ã¿Í ¼öÆòÀû µµ½ÃÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÀÌ °ÇÑ µµ½Ã·Î ºÐ·ùµÇ¾ú´Ù. ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ´Ü¼øÇÑ µµ½Ã À̹ÌÁö ºÐ¼® ¿¬±¸¿Í´Â ´Þ¸® º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ºÐ¼® ³»¿ëÀ» Åä´ë·Î ºñ±³Àû ¸íÈ®ÇÑ Áø´ÜÀ» ÅëÇØ, µµ½ÃÀÇ ¹Ì·¡»ó ¹× ¹æÇâ ¼³Á¤¿¡ µµ¿òÀ» ÁÖ°íÀÚ ³ë·ÂÇÏ¿´´Ù. |
|
| It constitutes a very important preliminary step to analyze how city image is assessed in order to determine the direction towards a desirable city image in planning on an urban landscape for future city image. This study aims to quantify the recognition and evaluation of a city image on the part of citizens, using multidimensional scaling and correspondence analysis. Furthermore, this study hopes to contribute to the quantified policy-making for improving city image by understanding how professionals and civil servants in the related field tend to recognize such image. The results from the study are as follow: 1. The image of Daejon City tends to be assessed strongly in the light of its history, dynamics, and size. While the City is recognized as new and changing in general, the civil servants consider the city as modest, and the professionals as mediocre. Therefore, the City should strive to conceive its own unique identity, which would lessen the current image of modest and mediocre. 2. Gap river, Dunsan New Town, and the Daeduk Reseach Complex turn out to be the symbolic representative venues of Daejon City, inspiring the city¡¯s image. In contrast, Yoosung Springs, the original town, and the Expo Park do not fit the image of the City. The need to renovate these places presents itself. 3. As for the questions using ¡°like¡± and ¡°not-like¡±, citizens and professionals show the tendency of not liking the city¡¯s image, whereas civil servants like it. It follows that the City needs to highlight its ¡°modern and high-technological¡± image, illuminated by Dunsan New Town and Daeduk Reseach Complex. 4. An image positioning drawn from a correspondence analysis shows that the City of Daejeon can be classified as an administrative and horizontal city. As opposed to the prior simplistic analyses of city image, this study attempts to diagnose it accurately, so as to help with the gearing towards city images in the future. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| À̹ÌÁö ºÐÆ÷µµ;µµ½Ã Á¤Ã¼¼º;°æ°ü°èȹ;´ÙÂ÷¿øÃ´µµ¹ý;´ëÀÀÀÏÄ¡ºÐ¼®;Image Positioning;City Identity;Urban Landscape;Multidimensional Scaling;Correspondence Analysis; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.38, no.2, 2010³â, pp.53-63
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201030159714953)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|