¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.38, no.2, 2010³â, pp.25-36
ÀÚ¿¬È޾縲 º¸Á¸°¡Ä¡ ÃøÁ¤À» À§ÇÑ Á¶°ÇºÎ°¡Ä¡ÃøÁ¤¹ý(CVM) ÃßÁ¤¾× ºñ±³
( Comparative Study on Monetary Estimates of the Preservation Value of Recreational Forests through Contingent Valuation Methods )
°­±â·¡; °æºÏ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø Á¶°æÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
¿ì¸®°¡ ÀϹÝÀûÀ¸·Î ÀνÄÇϰí ÀÖ´Â ÀÚ¿¬ÀÚ¿øÀÇ ÇϳªÀÎ »ê¸²ÀÌ Á¦°øÇØ ÁÖ´Â Áß¿äÇÑ ±â´ÉÀº °ø±â Á¤È­±â´É°ú ±× ¼Ó¿¡¼­ Àηù¿¡°Ô È޽İú ÈÞ¾çȰµ¿À» °¡´ÉÇÏ°Ô ÇØ ÁÖ´Â º¸°Ç±â´ÉÀ̶ó°í ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸, ±Ù·¡¿¡ µé¾î »ç¶÷µéÀÌ ´©¸®°í ÀÖ´Â ÀÚ¿¬È¯°æÀÇ Á߿伺Àº ÀνÄÇÏÁö¸¸ ¾î´À Á¤µµÀÇ °¡Ä¡°¡ ÀÖ´ÂÁö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áú¹®¿¡´Â ½±°Ô ´ë´äÇϱ⠰ï¶õÇÏ´Ù. ±× ÀÌÀ¯´Â ȯ°æÀç°¡ ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ °Å·¡µÇÁö ¾Ê´Â °ø°øÀçÀ̱⠶§¹®¿¡ °Å·¡ °¡°ÝÀÌ Çü¼ºµÇÁö ¾Ê±â ¶§¹®ÀÌ´Ù. ±×·¸±â ¶§¹®¿¡ ÇöÀç ÅëÈ­°¡Ä¡·Î ÃøÁ¤Çϱ⵵ ½±Áö ¾ÊÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ °¡Ä¡ÃøÁ¤À» À§ÇÑ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¾îµéÀÌ °æÁ¦ÇÐÀÚµé »çÀÌ¿¡¼­ ޱ¸µÇ¾î ¿Ô´Ù. ´ëÇ¥ÀûÀΠȯ°æÀçÀÇ °¡Ä¡ÃßÁ¤À» À§ÇÑ ¹æ¹ýÀº Á¶°ÇºÎ°¡Ä¡ÃøÁ¤¹ý(Contingent Valuation Methods: CVM)À̸ç, ¼öÇÐ, Åë°èÇÐ, °æÁ¦ÇÐÀÇ ¹ß´Þ°ú À̵é Çй®°úÀÇ À¶ÇÕ°úÁ¤¿¡¼­ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÃßÁ¤¹æ¹ýµéÀÌ ¿¬±¸µÇ¾îÁö°í ½ÃµµµÇ¾î ¿Ô´Ù. CVM¿¡¼­ ÁÖ·Î »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â ÃøÁ¤¹æ¹ýÀº ´ÜÀϰæ°è¿Í ÀÌÁß°æ°è¿¡¼­ÀÇ ·ÎÁþ°ú ÇÁ·Îºø ¹æ¹ýÀ̸ç, ÀÌ ³×°¡Áö ÃßÁ¤¾×À» ºñ±³Çϱâ À§ÇØ º» ¿¬±¸°¡ ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. CVM ÃßÁ¤¾×Àº ´ÜÀϰæ°è¿¡¼­ ÀÇ ·ÎÁþ Áß¾Ó°ªÀÌ °¡Àå ³·Àº ÃßÁ¤Ä¡°¡ µµÃâµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌÁß°æ°è¿¡¼­ÀÇ ÇÁ·Îºø Æò±Õ°ªÀÌ °¡Àå ³ôÀº ÃßÁ¤Ä¡°¡ µµÃâµÇ¾ú´Ù. CVMÀ» ÅëÇÑ È¯°æÀçÀÇ ÃßÁ¤±Ý¾×°ú ÃßÁ¤¹æ¹ýÀÇ ¼±Ç࿬±¸°¡ ¸î¸î ÀÖ¾úÀ¸³ª ºÎºÐÀûÀ¸·Î¸¸ ºñ±³Çϴµ¥ °ÅÃÆÀ¸³ª, º» ¿¬±¸´Â 1,123ºÎÀÇ ¼³¹®Áö¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© ³× °¡Áö ºÐ¼®¹æ¹ý°ú ±Ý¾×À» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ µµÃâµÈ °á°ú´Â Â÷ÈÄÀÇ ÃßÁ¤¾×°ú ÃßÁ¤¹æ¹ýÀÇ ºñ±³¸¦ À§ÇÑ ±âÃÊÀÚ·á·Î »ç¿ëµÉ °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëµÈ´Ù.
The generally known important functions of forests include air purification and the health benefits that humans can receive when relaxing and enjoying recreation in the forests. In recent years, people have appreciated the value of the natural environment but it is not easy to answer the question how much monetary value a natural environment has. Because environmental property is public property, which is not traded on the market, market prices cannot be established, so it is not easy to assess the currency value. Methods for estimating environmental property value have been studied by economists. The representative method for measuring environmental property value is a contingent valuation method, or CVM. Various methods have been researched and attempted along with the development and fusion of mathematics, statistics, and economics. Representative methods of CVM are single-bound and double-bound logit and probit methods. This study has been carried out to compare four estimates. Estimates are as follows: the lowest estimate is derived from a single-bound logit WTPmedian while the highest estimate is from double-bound probit WTPmean. While there are some preceding studies on price estimation and methods of measurement through CVM, they offer only partial comparisons. This study suggests four analytic methods and prices through 1,123 questionnaires. The results can be used for the subsequent comparison of estimate prices and the methods of measurement
 
Ű¿öµå
ÁöºÒÀÇ»ç¾×;´ÜÀϰæ°è;ÀÌÁß°æ°è;·ÎÁþ;ÇÁ·Îºø;ȯ°æÀç;WTP;Single-Bound;Double-Bound;Logit; Probit;Environmental Property;
 
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.38, no.2, 2010³â, pp.25-36
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201030159714950)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿