|
|
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.38, no.2, 2010³â, pp.9-24
|
Á¶°æ¼³°è ½ºÆ©µð¿À ±³À°¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇлýµéÀÇ ÀνÄ
( Students¡¯ Perception of Landscape Design Studio Education ) |
| ±è¾Æ¿¬; ¼¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ Á¶°æÇаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| º» ¿¬±¸´Â Á¶°æ¼³°è ¼ö¾÷ Àü¹Ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇлýµéÀÇ ÀνÄÀ» Á¶»çÇϰí, ¼³°è¼ö¾÷ °³¼±À» À§ÇÑ ¹æÇâÀ» µµÃâÇϰíÀÚÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â Á¡Â÷·Î ´ëÇб³À°ÀÌ Àý´ëÀûÀÎ Áö½ÄÀ» Àü´ÞÇÏ´Â ½ÇÁõÁÖÀÇÀû ¹è°æÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ Çлýµé ½º½º·Î°¡ Áö½ÄÀ» ±¸ÃàÇØ°¡´Â ±¸¼ºÁÖÀÇÀû ±³À°¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ÁøÈÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù´Â °¡Á¤À» µÐ´Ù. ÇлýµéÀÌ ¼³°è¼ö¾÷À» ¾î¶»°Ô °æÇèÇϰí, ´À³¢°í, ÀÌÇØÇϰí, Æò°¡Çϰí ÀÖ´ÂÁö¸¦ ÀÌÇØÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±¸¼ºÁÖÀÇ Ã¶Çаú °üÁ¡À» ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ¼³°è¼ö¾÷À» °³¼±Çϱâ À§ÇÑ Ã¹ ¹øÂ° ´Ü°èÀÌ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ¼³°è ½ºÆ©µð¿À ±³À°¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÌ·ÐÀû ¿¬±¸·Î ±³À°Ã¶ÇÐÀÇ º¯È, ½ºÆ©µð¿À ¼ö¾÷ÀÇ ±â¿ø°ú º¯È, °ÇÃàºÐ¾ßÀÇ ¼³°è ±³À°ÀÇ º¯È, ±×¸®°í Á¶°æ±³À°¿¡ ÀÖ¾î¼ ¼³°è±³À°¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ³íÀǸ¦ °íÂûÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ³× °³ ´ëÇÐÀÇ ÇкλýÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ½Ç½ÃÇÑ ¼³¹®Á¶»çÀÇ ³»¿ëÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× °á°ú, ¼³°è¼ö¾÷Àº ÇлýµéÀÌ Á¶°æ¼³°è°¡·Î¼ÀÇ Áø·Î¸¦ °áÁ¤Çϴµ¥ ±àÁ¤Àû ȤÀº ºÎÁ¤Àû ¿µÇâÀ» Çà»çÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Àý¹Ý Á¤µµÀÇ ÇлýµéÀº ¼³°è¼ö¾÷¿¡ ´ëÇØ ºÒ¸¸À» Ç¥½ÃÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, »ó´çÇÑ ½ÉÀû ºÎ´ã°¨À» ´À³¢´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ¼³°è°úÁ¤ÀÇ Ãʱâ´Ü°è¿Í °³³äÀ» ±¸Ã¼ÈÇÏ´Â ´Ü°è¿¡¼ °¡Àå ¸¹Àº ½ºÆ®·¹½º¸¦ ¹Þ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú°í, Áø·Î¿¡ ´ëÇÑ À¯º¸ÀûÀÎ Áý´ÜÀÌ ¼³°è¼ö¾÷¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ÉÀû ºÎ´ã°¨ÀÌ °¡Àå Å« °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÇлýµéÀº ½º½º·ÎÀÇ ¼³°è´É·Â¿¡ ´ëÇØ ºÎÁ¤ÀûÀ¸·Î Æò°¡Çϰí ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ¼ºÀûÀÌ ÇлýµéÀÇ ¼³°è´É·ÂÀ» Àß ¹Ý¿µÇØÁØ´Ù°í °ÇÏ°Ô ¹ÏÁö ¾Ê´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³ª, º¸´Ù Åõ¸íÇÑ Æò°¡Ã¼°è¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °í¹ÎÀÌ À̾îÁ®¾ßÇÔÀ» ½Ã»çÇÑ´Ù. |
|
| This study investigates how students perceive landscape design studio classes and provides basic data to set guidelines for future student-oriented pedagogical strategies in landscape architectural design education. This study is based on the premise that the current dominant educational method, which is based on positivism, should shift to a constructivist approach, which allows students to question objective and absolute truths and restructure knowledge based on their own experiences. Unlike lecture-oriented classes, studio education relies heavily on the perceptions, attitudes, and capabilities of individual students because the nature of the class asks each student to find solutions to given project problems in creative and visual ways. Therefore, it is important to understand the psychological state of students during these classes in order to set alternative criteria for design studio education. This study contains three parts. The first part reviews theoretical discourses to understand the demands for a student-oriented educational paradigm shift and the nature of the design studio at many levels. The second part analyzes how students perceive design studio classes in terms of their satisfaction and stress levels and how studio classes affect their decision making regarding future careers. The stress levels accompanying the design process are also investigated, based on a survey of undergraduate students who are enrolled in the landscape architecture programs of four universities in Korea. According to the findings, design studio classes play a specific role in students' decision making about their future careers. Almost half of students turn out to be dissatisfied with their design education, and half of students suffer from high stress levels caused by studio classes, especially in the early phases of the design process. The findings suggest that instructors should give more attention to discovering ways to help students initiate the design process and bridge ideas and forms, provide clear guidelines for evaluation of students' abilities, and develop a more holistic approach in design studio classes that is based on individual problem-solving processes. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| ¼³°è±³À°;±¸¼ºÁÖÀÇ;¼³°è°úÁ¤;Design Education;Constructivist Approach;Design Process; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.38, no.2, 2010³â, pp.9-24
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201030159714948)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|