|
|
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.38, no.4, 2010³â, pp.25-34
|
°ñÇÁÀå ÀÌ¿ëÀÚ ¼±È£µµ Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥ °³¹ß
( A Study on Development of Evaluation Indicator for Golf Course User's Preference ) |
| ¼®¿µÈ¯;¹®¼®±â;ÀÌÀº¿±; ¼ºê¿ø;ûÁÖ´ëÇб³ ȯ°æÁ¶°æÇаú;Çѱ¹ÅäÁöÁÖÅðø»ç ÅäÁöÁÖÅÿ¬±¸¿ø;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| º» ¿¬±¸´Â °ñÇÁÀåÀÇ °æ±â·Â°ú ¿î¿µ°ü¸® Çâ»óÀ» À§ÇÑ Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥µéÀ» °³¹ßÇϰíÀÚ ¼öÇàµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ¿¬±¸°á°ú¸¦ ¿ä¾àÇÏ¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. À̷בּ¸ ¹× Àü¹®°¡ ¿¹ºñ¼³¹®À» ÅëÇØ °¡Á¤µÈ °ñÇÁÀå Á¶¼º ¹× ¿î¿µ°ü¸® 15°³ Áß°£Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥, 55°³ ÇÏÀ§Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥ ü°è°¡ ¼º¸³µÇÁö ¾Ê°í ÃÖÁ¾ÀûÀ¸·Î ȯ°æÄ£È¼º, ȸ¿ø¼ºñ½º ¼öÁØ, ÁøÇà¿øÀÇ ÀÎÀû¼ºñ½º ¼öÁØ, ÄÚ½ºÀÇ ³À̵µ, ÄÚ½º°ü¸®¼öÁØ, ¿î¿µ°ü¸® °øÁ¤¼º, Á¢±Ù¼º ¹× ÀÔÁö¼º, Ŭ·´ÀÇ ÀüÅ뼺 ¹× Ŭ·´ÀÇ ºÐÀ§±â, ÄÚ½ºÀÇ ¿ì¼ö¼º, ÄÚ½º·¹À̾ƿô µî 10°³ÀÇ Áß°¡ Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥ ¹× 52°³ ÇÏÀ§Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥·Î À籸¼ºµÇ¾ú´Ù. °ñÇÁÀå ÀÌ¿ëÀÚ ¼±È£µµ Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥ÀÇ Á߿䵵 °áÁ¤¿äÀÎÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú, ÄÚ½ºÀÇ °ü¸®¼öÁØ, Æ÷½ºÀÇ ¿ì¼ö¼º, ÁøÇà¿øÀÇ ÀÎÀû¼ºñ½º ¼öÁØ, ÄÚ½º·¹À̾ƿô, ȯ°æÄ£È¼º ¼øÀ¸·Î ±â¿©µµ°¡ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. °ñÇÁÀå Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥ÀÇ °æ·Î°è¼ö¸¦ ÆÄ¾ÇÇÑ °á°ú, ÄÚ½º·¹À̾ƿô ºÎ¹®¿¡¼´Â ȦÀÇ ±¼°î°ú ÄÚ½º±æÀÌÀÇ ¼øÀ¸·Î ÀΰúÈ¿°úÀÇ Å©±â°¡ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÄÚ½ºÀÇ ¿ì¼ö¼º¿¡´Â Åä³Ê¸àÆ® ÁøÇà½Ã¼³, ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¼¦ ¹ë·ù(shot value)ÀÇ ¼øÀ¸·Î, ¿î¿µ°ü¸® °øÁ¤¼º¿¡´Â ´ë±âÀÇ Æí¸®¼º, ¿¹¾àÀÇ °øÁ¤ÇÑ ¹èÁ¤ µîÀÇ ¼øÀ¸·Î Àΰú°ü°è°¡ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Ŭ·´ÀÇ ÀüÅ뼺 ºÎºÐÀº °ñÇÁÄÚ½ºÀÇ ¿ª»ç ¹× ȯ°æÀû Ư¼º, Áö¿ªÀÇ ¿ª»ç¹®È°¡, Á¢±Ù¼º ¹× ÀÔÁö¼º°ú °ü·ÃÇØ¼´Â Áö¸®Àû Á¶°ÇÀÌ, ȯ°æÄ£È¼º¿¡¼´Â ³ó¾à ¹× ºñ·áÀ¯Ãâ·®, ¼öÁú¿À¿° µîÀÌ, ȸ¿ø¼ºñ½º ¼öÁØ¿¡¼´Â ȸ¿øÇýÅðú Á÷¿øÀÇ Ä£ÀýÇÑ ÀÀ´ë µîÀÌ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ÀΰúÈ¿°úÀÇ Å©±â°¡ ³ôÀº ÁöÇ¥·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. °æ±âÁøÇà¿øÀÇ ÀÎÀû¼ºñ½º ¼öÁØ ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼´Â °æ±âÁøÇà¿øÀÇ Ä£ÀýÇÑ ÀÀ´ë, °æ±âÁøÇà¿øÀÇ Àü¹®Áö½Ä Á¤µµ°¡, ÄÚ½ºÀÇ ³À̵µ ºÎºÐÀº ƼÀ× ¿¡¾î¸®¾î(Terming area)ÀÇ À§Ä¡, ¿Àºñ(Out of Bounds: OB) ¹× ÇØÀúµå(Hazard) ¸»¶Ò À§Ä¡ÀÇ ¼øÀ¸·Î ÄÚ½ºÀÇ °ü¸®¼öÁØ¿¡´Â ·¯ÇÁ»óÅ ¹× Àå¾Ö¹° °ü¸®»óÅ µîÀÌ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ÀΰúÈ¿°ú°¡ ³ô¾Ò´ø ÁöÇ¥µé·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÇâÈÄ º¸´Ù ¼¼ºÎÀûÀÎ Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥µéÀ» µµÃâÇÏ´Â Èļӿ¬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇØ °ñÇÁÀå ÀÌ¿ëÀÚ ¼±È£µµ Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥ ü°è ¸ðµ¨À» ¿Ï¼ºÇϰí, ±¹³»¿Ü °ñÇÁÀåÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥µéÀ» ÇöÀå Àû¿ëÇÏ°í °ËÁõÇØ º¸´Â °úÁ¤ÀÌ µÞ¹ÞħµÉ Çʿ䰡 ÀÖ´Ù. |
|
| This study was conducted to develop evaluation indicators to improve athletic performance and operational management of golf courses and the results of the research are as follows. Through theoretical research and a preliminary professional survey, 15 on-going evaluations of golf course composition and operational management and 55 sub-evaluation indices were rejected while 10 on-going evaluations and 52 sub-evaluation indicators were reconfigured as final for environmental-friendliness, level of member services, level of human service of game personnel, difficulties of course, management level of the course, fairness of operational management, accessibility and location characteristic, traditions and ambiance of the golf club, quality of course, and course layout. When analyzing the important decision factors in golf course user preference evaluation indicators, the following contributed in the order of higher to lower contributions: the management level of the course, excellence of the course, level of human services for personnel, course layout and environmental-friendliness. When identifying the path coefficient of golf course evaluation indicators, the curvature of a hole and the length of the course had a causal effect on the 'course layout' section. Tournament facilities and various shot values had a causal relationship with 'excellence of the course', in the order of higher to lower, and convenience of waiting and fair allocation of reservations for 'fairness of operational management'. The history of the golf course and its environmental characteristics, history and culture of the region have relatively higher causal effects on 'traditions of the golf club' and geographical conditions on 'accessibility and location characteristics', pesticide and fertilizer usage and water pollution on 'environmental-friendliness', and member benefit and kindness of employees on 'level of member services'. The kindness and expertise of the game personnel had a relatively higher causal effect on the 'level of human services of game personnel', the location of tenning area, and location of OB and hazards on 'difficulties of course', and rough conditions and obstacles management on 'management level of the course'. There is a need to complete a systematic evaluation index system for golf course user preferences through future studies for a more detailed assessment, as well as a process to verify these evaluation indicators by application to domestic and international golf courses. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| °æ±â¼º;ÄÚ½ºÀÇ ¿ì¼ö¼º;ÄÚ½ºÀÇ °ü¸®¼öÁØ;ȯ°æÄ£È¼º;ÄÚ½ºÀÇ Áú;Playability;Excellence of the Course;Management Level of the Course;Environmental-Friendliness;Quality of Golf Course; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.38, no.4, 2010³â, pp.25-34
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201013240702292)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|