|
|
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.38, no.5, 2010³â, pp.21-30
|
µµ½Ã°ø¿ø Ư¼º¿¡ µû¸¥ °ü¸®À¯ÇüÀÇ Æò°¡
( An Evaluation on Management Types by Characteristics of Urban Parks ) |
| ±èÈ¿Á¤;°ÀºÁö;Á¶ÁßÇö; ¼¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø Á¶°æÇаú;¼¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø Á¶°æÇаú;(ÁÖ)¸í¼ÒIMC;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÃÖ±Ù °ø¿ø°ü¸®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »õ·Î¿î ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀÌ ¿ä±¸µÊ¿¡ µû¶ó °ø¿øÀ¯ÇüÀ» ÀçºÐ·ùÇϰí, ±×¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÑ °ü¸®¹æ½ÄÀ» Á¦¾ÈÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¦¾ÈµÈ °ø¿øÀ¯ÇüÀº °ø¿øÀÌ¿ëÀÚ, ÀÌ¿ë½Ã¼³ ¹× ÀÚ¿ø, °ü¸®¾÷¹«ÀÇ ³À̵µ¿¡ µû¶ó '»êÁöÀÚ¿¬Çü °ø¿ø', '»ýŸñÀûÇü °ø¿ø', '½Ã¼³ÁýÁßÇü °ø¿ø'À¸·Î ºÐ·ùÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. À̸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î °ø¹«¿ø°ú ÀϹݽùΠµî ÀÌ¿ëÀÚ·Î ³ª´©¾î ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ÇÑ °á°ú, »êÁöÀÚ¿¬Çü °ø¿øÀº ÁֹεéÀÌ ÀÏ»óÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ´Â °ø¿øÀ¸·Î Àü¹®ÀûÀÎ Áö½ÄÀ̳ª ±â¼úÀ» ÇÊ¿ä·Î ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ¸¹Ç·Î ÀÚÄ¡±¸¿¡¼ °ü¸®ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÀûÇÕÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. »ýŸñÀûÇü °ø¿øÀº Àü¹®¼ºÀÌ ¿ä±¸µÇ´Â °ø¿øÀ¸·Î Àü¹®¼ºÀ» °¡Áø ¹Î°£´Üü¸¦ ÁöÁ¤ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÁÁÀ¸¸ç, ½Ã¼³ÁýÁßÇü °ø¿øÀº º¹ÇÕÀûÀÎ °ø°£À¸·ÎÇÑ ¹æ½Äº¸´Ù´Â ´Ù¾çÇÏ°í º¹ÇÕÀûÀÎ °ü¸®¹æ½ÄÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. |
|
| The purpose of this study was to suggest customized management methods tailored to the characteristics of each type of park. Related literature was reviewed to determine the types of and management methods for urban parks to discuss the possibility of the involvement of citizens in park management and committing park management to the private sector. As a result of analyzing the literature, it has been found that each park should be managed separately according to its type in light of its characteristics and the strengths and weaknesses of each management method. For this reason, this must be a very important element for preventing damaging behavior at tourist destinations. First, natural mountainous parks are ordinary parks that do not require any professional management knowledge or skills. Accordingly, these parks should be managed by the districts in which they are located. Second, eco-oriented parks ask for specialized management. As domestic cases show, it will be advisable to commit the management of these parks to specialized, highly-experienced private organizations. Third, facilities-centered parks are large in size in response to the diverse needs of citizens, and it seems that a combination of different methods is better than merely sticking to any particular method. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| µµ½Ã°ø¿ø °ü¸®;µµ½Ã°ø¿øÀÇ À¯Çü;»êÁöÀÚ¿¬Çü °ø¿ø;»ýŸñÀûÇü °ø¿ø;½Ã¼³ÁýÁßÇü °ø¿ø;Management of The Urban Parks;Types of Urban Parks;Natural Mountainous Parks;Eco-Oriented Parks;Facility-Centered Parks; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.38, no.5, 2010³â, pp.21-30
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201015037860763)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|