¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.38, no.5, 2010³â, pp.12-20
°ø°£ ±¸Á¶º° ¿­ÄèÀû¼º Æò°¡¿Í ¿­È¯°æ °³¼±¹æ¾È
( An Evaluation of Human Thermal Comfort and Improvement of Thermal Environment by Spatial Structure )
ÀÌÁ¤¾Æ;Á¤´ë¿µ;ÀüÁøÇü;ÀÌ»ó¹®;¼Û¿µ¹è; °í·Á´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø;°í·Á´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø;°í·Á´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ»ýŰøÇкÎ;Çù¼º´ëÇб³ µµ½Ã°øÇаú;Çù¼º´ëÇб³ µµ½Ã°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â µµ½Ã ¼Ò°ø°£ÀÇ ¿­È¯°æÀ» °³¼±Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ¹æ¾ÈÀ» ¸ð»öÇϰíÀÚ °ø°£ ±¸Á¶º° ¿­Æ¯¼ºÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. µµ½É ³» À§Ä¡ÇÑ °í·Á´ëÇб³ Ä·ÆÛ½º¸¦ ¿¬±¸ ´ë»óÁö·Î ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ´ë»óÁö ³»¿¡ °ø°£ À¯ÇüÀ» ´ëÇ¥ÇÏ´Â °¢°¢ÀÇ Àå¼Ò¿¡¼­ ¿­È¯°æÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±â»óÀåºñ¸¦ Ȱ¿ëÇÑ ¹Ì±â»ó ¹× ¹ÙÀÌ¿À ±â»ó ÃøÁ¤, ¾î¾È·»Áî ÃÔ¿µ»çÁø(Fish-eye lens photography)¸¦ Ȱ¿ëÇÑ °ø°£±¸Á¶ ¹× Ư¼º ºÐ¼®, ±×¸®°í ¿Âµµ³ª ½Àµµ¿Í °°Àº ±â»óÁ¤º¸ ¹× À̹ÌÁö Á¤º¸¸¦ Ȱ¿ëÇÑ ¿­ÄèÀû¼º ¸ðµ¨¸µÀÇ ¼ø¼­·Î °ø°£ÀÇ ¿­È¯°æ ¹× ÀÎü ¿­ÄèÀû¼ºÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿­È¯°æ Æò°¡ °á°ú, ÀÎü ¿­ÄèÀû¼ºÀÇ Á¤µµ´Â Ä·ÆÛ½º °ø°£ÀÇ À¯Çü¿¡ µû¶ó Â÷À̰¡ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. °Ç¹°À̳ª ¼ö¸ñ µî¿¡ ÀÇÇØ À§¿äµÈ Æó¼âÇü °ø°£ À¯Çü¿¡¼­ °³¹æÇü °ø°£ À¯Çü¿¡¼­ ºÐ¼®µÈ Æò±Õ º¹»ç¿Âµµ, PMV, PET Áö¼öº¸´Ù ´õ ¾çÈ£ÇÑ °ÍÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °á°ú´Â ¼ö¸ñ°ú °Ç¹°¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Å¾纹»ç¿­ÀÇ Â÷´Ü ¹× ±×¸²ÀÚÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ±â ¶§¹®À̶ó°í ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯¹Ç·Î °ø°£À» °èȹÇÒ ¶§ °³¹æ¼ºÀ̳ª Åëdz¼ºÀ» ³ôÀ̱â À§ÇÑ ¼ö¸ñÀÇ ¹èÄ¡¸¦ °í·ÁÇÏ°í º¹»ç¿­À» Â÷´ÜÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹Ù´ÚÆ÷ÀåÀ̳ª °Ç¹° ¿ÜÀåÀç Á¾·ù¸¦ ¼±ÅÃÇÒ Çʿ䰡 ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â µµ½Ã °ø°£ÀÇ ÀÌ¿ëÀÚ°¡ ½ÇÁ¦ÀûÀ¸·Î ´À³¢´Â ¿­ÄèÀû¼ºÀÇ Á¤µµ¸¦ Á¤·®È­Çϰí À̸¦ Æò°¡ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ÀÌ¿ëÀÚ¸¦ °í·ÁÇÑ °ø°£°èȹ ¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦¾ÈÇÏ¿´´Ù.ÀÎü ¿­ÄèÀû¼ºÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â Á¤·®Àû Æò°¡ ¹æ¹ý ¹× ±×¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿¬±¸°á°ú´Â ÇâÈÄ µµ½Ã °ø°£ÀÇ ÄèÀûÇÑ È¯°æÀ» Á¶¼ºÇϴµ¥ ±â¿©ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate human thermal comfort by spatial structure and to explore solutions to improve the thermal environment of a small urban space. The study site was Korea University campus. Thermal conditions were measured to evaluate the quality of the thermal environment in each type of space within the study site. Micrometeorology measurements, analysis of space characteristics for using fish-eye lens photography, and thermal comfort modeling through the use of collected meteorological data, such as temperature and humidity, were performed. Results showed that the level of thermal comfort for humans differs depending on the types of space within the study site. Thermal comfort is better in open spaces than enclosed in the aspect of radiative mean temperature, Predicted Mean Vote(PMV), and Physiologically Equivalent Temperature(PET). This fact is probably due to shadows or buildings or trees that may block solar radiation. Thus, it is necessary to consider the spatial arrangements of buildings and trees to enhance openness and ventilation in the space. Paving materials and exterior building materials should also be selected to lower the radiant temperature. Given these results, a quantitative evaluation on human thermal comfort could propose a way to plan user comfortable small urban spaces. Study methods used and results provided in the study can promote a better way for urban space planning direction to improve environmental quality.
 
Ű¿öµå
¿­ÄèÀû¼º ¸ðµ¨¸µ;°³¹æ¼º;Åëdz¼º;º¹»ç¿­;Ä·ÆÛ½º °ø°£ À¯Çü;Thermal Comfort Modeling;Openness;Ventilation;Radiant Temperature;Types of Campus Space;
 
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.38, no.5, 2010³â, pp.12-20
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201015037860762)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿