¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.39, no.4, 2011³â, pp.60-73
ºÏÇÑ»ê µÑ·¹±æ À̿밴 ¸¸Á·µµ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( A Study on Visitor Satisfaction for Bukhansan Dulegil )
Á¶¿ìÇö;À±ÈñÀç;Àӽºó; ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø Çùµ¿°úÁ¤ Á¶°æÇÐ;¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø Çùµ¿°úÁ¤ Á¶°æÇÐ;¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Á¶°æ.Áö¿ª½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
2007³â 9¿ù Á¦ÁÖ ¿Ã·¹±æÀÌ °³ÀåµÇ°í, ¼±Ç³ÀûÀÎ Àαâ¸ôÀ̸¦ Çϸ鼭 Àü±¹ÀûÀ¸·Î '°È´Â ±æ'¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü½ÉÀÌ Áõ´ëÇÏ¿´°í, ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó Áß¾ÓºÎó ¹× Áö¹æÀÚÄ¡´Üüµéµµ ´Ù¾çÇÑ '°È°í ½ÍÀº ±æ'À» ÁöÁ¤Çϰųª Á¶¼ºÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. '°È°í ½ÍÀº ±æ'Àº Â÷·®¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ À̵¿°ú Àå¼Ò Áß½ÉÀÇ ´ÜÀýµÈ Á¡Àû °ü±¤¿¡¼­ ¹þ¾î³ª Á÷Á¢ °ÉÀ¸¸é¼­ Áö¿ªÀÇ °æ°ü ¹× ¹®È­¸¦ º¸°í, ´À³¢°í, üÇèÇÏ´Â ¿¬¼ÓÀûÀÎ ±ä ¼±Àû ¿©Çà±æÀÌ´Ù. '°È°í ½ÍÀº ±æ'Àº ÀÌ¹Ì Çü¼ºµÇ¾î ÀÖ´Â ±æÀ» ¹ß±¼ÇÏ¿© ÃÖ´ëÇÑ È°¿ëÇϰí, Áö¿ª¿¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ »ýÅÂ, ¿ª»ç, ¹®È­ÀÚ¿øµéÀ» È¿À²ÀûÀ¸·Î ¿¬°èÇÏ´Â ±æ·Î¼­, ³ë¼± ¼±Á¤ÀÌ Á¦ÀÏ Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù°í ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª, '°È°í ½ÍÀº ±æ'ÀÇ ³ë¼± ¼±Á¤ ½Ã ´Ù¾çÇÑ °èȹ¿ä¼Ò¸¦ °í·ÁÇÏ°í ³ë¼± ¹× ±¸°£º°·Î ´Ù¾çÇÑ Å׸¶¸¦ ºÎ¿©ÇÏ¿© ÁöÁ¤µÇ°Å³ª Á¶¼ºµÇ¾úÁö¸¸, ÆíÀǽü³ ºÎÁ· µî¿¡ µû¸¥ À̿밴ÀÇ ºÒÆíÇÔ°ú °°Àº ¿©·¯ ¹®Á¦Á¡µéÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³ª°í ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ±æ ÁöÁ¤ ¹× Á¶¼º ÀÌÈÄ À̿밴µéÀÇ Æò°¡´Â Á¦´ë·Î ÀÌ·ç¾îÁöÁö ¸øÇϰí ÀÖ´Â ½ÇÁ¤À̹ǷÎ, º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â Á¶¼ºÀÌ ¿Ï·áµÇ¾î ¸¹Àº À̿밴µéÀÌ ÀÌ¿ëÇϰí ÀÖ´Â ºÏÇÑ»ê µÑ·¹±æÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î À̿밴µéÀÇ ¸¸Á·µµ¸¦ Á¶»çÇϰí, ³ë¼± ¼±Á¤ ½Ã °í·ÁÇÑ °èȹ¿ä¼ÒµéÀÌ ¸¸Á·µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ´õ ³ªÀº ±æ Á¶¼ºÀ» À§ÇÑ °³¼±¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦½ÃÇϰíÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇÏ¿© ¹®ÇåÁ¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© ³ë¼± ¼±Á¤ ½Ã Áß¿äÇÑ °èȹ¿ä¼Ò¸¦ ÆÄ¾ÇÇϰí, À̸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ¼³¹®Áö¸¦ ÀÛ¼ºÇÏ¿© À̿밴À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î °¢ ±¸°£º° ¸¸Á·µµ, Àç¹æ¹® ÀÇ»ç, ÃßõÀǻ翡 ´ëÇÑ ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇöÀåÁ¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© ÆÄ¾ÇÇÑ ±¸°£º° ƯÁ¤À» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î 5°³ÀÇ À¯ÇüÀ¸·Î ±æÀ» ºÐ·ùÇϰí, ±¸°£º° ¸¸Á·µµ¿Í À¯Çüº° ¸¸Á·µµ¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, °èȹ¿ä¼Ò°¡ ¸¸Á·µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ, ¸¸Á·µµ°¡ Àç¹æ¹® ÀÇ»ç ¹× ÃßõÀǻ翡 ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ, À̿밴µéÀÌ ÀÎÁöÇÏ´Â ±¸°£º° Å׸¶¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±¸°£º° ¸¸Á·µµ´Â ÀÚ¿¬Àû ¿ä¼Ò°¡ °­ÇÑ ±¸°£ÀÌ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ¸¸Á·µµ¿¡ ¿µÇâ·ÂÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °èȹ¿ä¼Ò·Î´Â 'º¸ÇàÄèÀû¼º'ÀÌ °¡Àå ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î Á¶»çµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ¸¸Á·µµ´Â Àç¹æ¹® ÀÇ»ç ¹× Å¸Àο¡°Ô ÃßõÇÏ·Á´Â Àǻ翡 ´ëÇÏ¿© ³ôÀº ¿µÇâ·ÂÀ» º¸ÀÌ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î Á¶»çµÇ¾ú´Ù.
Since Jeju Ollegil opened in September 2007 and attracted the sensation of popularity throughout the country, the interest in 'Walking Trails' has increased, and the central ministries and the local governments composite and assign various 'Walking Trails'. Walking trails are not tours on which people go to see one spot and move to another spot by vehicle, but a long linear journey that leads people to see, to feel and to experience a region's landscape and culture while walking on the trail. 'Walking Trails' are efficient routes to discover and to use a former way and to link the various ecological regions' histories and cultural resources, so it is most important to select a route. Although the routes were selected by considering the various planning factors and giving each route a specified theme, some problems like the inconvenience of visitors caused by lack of facilities have occurred. After designation and construction of the trails, they were not properly evaluated by visitors. Therefore, it is the purpose of this study to suggest a better way to construct the trails by surveying visitor satisfaction and by analyzing the impact of planning a route on visitor satisfaction at Bukhansan Dulegil which was completed. For this study, with a questionnaire based on the literature review to identify the important planning factors for selecting a route, a survey was conducted on visitor satisfaction for each section and their intention to revisit and to recommend that trail. Based on the characteristics of each section that was identified in the field research, the trails were classified into five types and satisfaction of each type and each type was analyzed. In addition, analyzing the impact of planning factors on satisfaction, the impact of satisfaction on revisiting and recommending and visitors' perception of the theme, further improvement for better construction of the trail was presented. Satisfaction of sectors with strong natural elements was higher; 'walking comfort' was the highest planning factor affecting satisfaction. In addition, satisfaction was surveyed to have high influence on revisiting and recommending.
 
Ű¿öµå
°èȹ¿ä¼Ò;¼³¹®Á¶»ç;»ó°ü°ü°èºÐ¼®;Èñ±ÍºÐ¼®;º¸ÇàÄèÀû¼º;Planning Factors;Questionnaire Survey;Correlation Analysis;Regression Analysis;Walking Comfort;
 
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.39, no.4, 2011³â, pp.60-73
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201134036358098)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿