|
|
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ / v.39, no.4, 2011³â, pp.1-10
|
±¹³» °æ°ü°èȹ °ü·ÃÁöħ ¹× °èȹ³»¿ë ºÐ¼®
( Analysis of Guidelines and Content of Visual Landscape Planning in Korea ) |
| ÁÖ½ÅÇÏ;±è¿µÈñ; ¼¿ï¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹»ý¸íÁ¶°æÇаú;¼¿ï¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø ¿ø¿¹Çаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| º» ¿¬±¸´Â °æ°ü¹ý Á¦Á¤ ÀÌÈÄ °æ°ü¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °æ°ü°èȹ °ü·ÃÁöħ°ú °æ°ü°èȹÀÇ ³»¿ëÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© °æ°ü°èȹ ÁøÇà»çÇ×°ú ¹®Á¦Á¡À» ÆÄ¾ÇÇϰí, ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °³¼±¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦¾ÈÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °æ°ü°èȹÀÇ Æ¯Á¤À» »ìÆìº¸±â À§ÇØ °æ°ü°èȹ ¼ö¸³ ½Ã ±âÃʰ¡ µÇ´Â °æ°ü°èȹ¼ö¸³Áöħ°ú °æ°ü°èȹº¸°í¼¸¦ ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °æ°ü°èȹ¼ö¸³Áöħ ºÐ¼®Àº ½ÇÁ¦ °æ°ü°èȹÀ» ¼ö¸³ÇÑ Àü¹®°¡¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, Á߿䵵-¼ºÃëµµ ºÐ¼®±â¹ýÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© °¢ ´Ü°èº° Áöħ ³»¿ëÀÇ À¯È¿¼º°ú Çö½ÇÀû¿ë Á¤µµ µîÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °æ°ü°èȹº¸°í¼ ºÐ¼®Àº ¹ýÁ¤°èȹÀ¸·Î ±âº»°æ°ü°èȹÀÌ ÀÌ¹Ì ¼ö¸³µÈ ÀÚÄ¡´Üü Áß ±¤¿ª½Ã, ½Ã, ±ºº°·Î °¢ 2°÷À» ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿© ÃÑ 6°³ÀÇ °æ°ü°èȹ º¸°í¼¸¦ °æ°ü°èȹ¼ö¸³ÁöħÀ» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. °æ°üÀÚ¿øÁ¶»ç ¹× ºÐ¼®´Ü°è´Â °¡Àå ü°èÈµÈ Æ²·Î ÁøÇàµÇ°í ÀÖ¾úÀ¸³ª, Áö³ªÄ¡°Ô ¼¼ºÐÈµÇ¾î ½ÇÁ¦ °æ°ü°èȹ ½Ã µµ¿òÀÌ µÇÁö ¸øÇϰí ÀÖ´Â ºÎºÐÀÌ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ¹Ý¸é, °æ°ü±¸Á¶ºÐ¼®Àº °æ°ü±¸Á¶ºÐ¼®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´Ù¾çÇÑ Á¢±Ù¹æ¹ý°ú ±â¹ý µîÀÇ ±¸Ã¼Àû ¹æ¾È Á¦½Ã°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÄ¾ÇµÇ¾ú´Ù. °æ°ü±âº»±¸»ó´Ü°è´Â ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ÇöȲÁ¶»ç °á°ú¿Í »óÀ§°èȹ µîÀ» ¹Ý¿µÇÏ¿© Áö¿ªÆ¯¼º¿¡ ¸Â´Â ÁöÀÚü ¾ÆÀÌ¿£Æ¼Æ¼ÀÇ È®¸³ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇϸç, °æ°ü°èȹ¼ö¸³Áöħ¿¡¼µµ º¸´Ù ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ ÁöħÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÄ¾ÇµÇ¾ú´Ù. °æ°ü±âº»°èȹ´Ü°è´Â ÁöÀÚü °£ÀÇ ¼öÁØÀÇ Â÷À̰¡ °¡Àå Å« °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³ª¼, °æ°ü°èȹ¼ö¸³Áöħ¿¡¼ °èȹ ³»¿ë¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ ÁöħÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸ÀδÙ. °æ°ü°èȹ¼ö¸³Áöħ »ó °æ°üÀÚ¿øÁ¶»ç ¹× ºÐ¼®´Ü°è¿¡¼´Â '°æ°üÀÚ¿øÁ¶»ç Á¾ÇÕ ¹× °úÁ¦µµÃâ'°ú ±âº»°æ°ü°èȹ´Ü°èÀÇ 'Á¶¸ÁÁ¡ °èȹ'ÀÌ Ãß°¡µÇ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. |
|
| The purpose of this study is to analyze the guidelines and content of visual landscape planning according to the Landscape Law and to suggest improvements for it. The landscape planning guidelines were analyzed and landscape planning reports were reviewed and compared. To analyze the landscape planning guidelines, we conducted an expert survey and derived the results through statistical methods, such as t-test and importance-performance analysis(IPA). Both landscape planning reports were selected from among metropolitan cities, medium-sized cities, and counties. We analyzed and compared the reports with the landscape planning guidelines. The results of this study are as follows. The stage of visual landscape resource survey progressed systematically, but it was not practical for actual planning because of the excessively detailed guidelines. On the other hand, a greater variety of methods and techniques should be suggested for the landscape structure analysis. At the schematic planning stage, establishing contents suitable for the local government's identity and related plans is necessary. In addition, more detailed guidelines should be included in the landscape planning guidelines. At the master planning stage, the planning qualities and contents differed from cities and counties, so more substantial and detailed guidelines are necessary for the scope and contents. We suggested that some additional items be included such as the synthesis of landscape resource surveys and the viewpoint plan. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| °æ°ü¹ý;°æ°ü°èȹ¼ö¸³Áöħ;°æ°ü°èȹ°úÁ¤;Á߿䵵-¼ºÃëµµºÐ¼®;The Landscape Law;Landscape Planning Guidelines;Process of Visual Landscape Planning;Importance-Performance Analysis(IPA); |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸÁö / v.39, no.4, 2011³â, pp.1-10
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1225-1755
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201134036358088)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|