¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ / v.12, no.2, 1996³â, pp.71-84
¾ÐÃà ¹× ÀιßÇÏÁßÀ» ¹Þ´Â ±×¹°½Ä »Ñ¸®¸»¶ÒÀÇ ÃÖÀû Ÿ¼³°æ»ç°¢
( An Optimum Slanting Angle in Reticulated Root Piles Installation under Compressive and Uplift Loads )
À̽ÂÇö;±è¸íº¸; Á¤È¸¿ø, ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;Á¤È¸¿ø, ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ¿©·¯°¡ÁöÀÇ Å¸¼³°æ»ç°¢À» °®´Â ¸ðÇü ±×¹°½Ä »Ñ¸®¸»¶ÒÀ» Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿© ¸ðÇüÅäÁ¶¿¡ ¼³Ä¡ÇÏ°í ·¹ÀÌ´×(raining)¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î Áö¹ÝÀ» Á¶¼ºÇÑ ´ÙÀ½ ¾ÐÃà½ÃÇè ¹× Àι߽ÃÇèÀ» ÇÏ¿© ±×¹°½Ä »Ñ¸®¸»¶ÒÀÇ Å¸¼³°æ»ç°¢°ú ÇÏÁßÁöÁö·Â »çÀÌÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ ºñ±³ºÐ¼® ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸ðÇü¸»¶ÒÀº 0$^{circ}$, 5$^{circ}$, $10^{circ}$, 15$^{circ}$, 20$^{circ}$, ±×¸®°í 25$^{circ}$ÀÇ Å¸¼³°æ»ç°¢À» °®´Â Á÷°æ SulmÀÇ °­ºÀ¿¡ ¸ð·¡¸¦ ÀÔÈù °ÍÀ¸·Î Á÷°æÀÌ 6.5muL ±æÀ̰¡ 300mm°¡ µÇµµ·Ï ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸ðÇü »Ñ¸®¸»¶ÒÀÇ ¹èÄ¡´Â µ¿ÀÏÇÑ Å¸¼³°æ»ç°¢À» °®´Â 8°³ÀÇ ¸ðÇü ¸»¶ÒÀ» 4°³¾¿ 2°³ÀÇ Å©°í ÀÛÀº µ¿½É¿ø¿¡ Á¢Çϵµ·Ï ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×¸®°í ¸ðÇü ¿øÇü ¾èÀº ±âÃʸ¦ Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿© ¾ÐÃà½ÃÇèÀ» ¼öÇàÇÑ ´ÙÀ½ ÁöÁö·ÂÀ» ±¸ÇÏ¿© »Ñ¸®¸»¶ÒÀÇ ÁöÁö·Â°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¾ÐÃà½ÃÇè ¹× Àι߽ÃÇè °á°ú¸¦ ȸ±ÍºÐ¼®Çϸé ÇÏÁßÁöÁö´É·ÂÀÌ ÃÖ´ë°¡ µÇ´Â Ÿ¼³°æ»ç°¢Àº ´ë·« 12$^{circ}$~13$^{circ}$»çÀÌÀÌ´Ù. ÃÖÀû Ÿ¼³°æ»ç°¢¿¡¼­ÀÇ »Ñ¸®¸»¶ÒÀÇ ¾ÐÃàÁöÁö·ÂÀº ¿øÇü ¾èÀº±âÃÊÀÇ ÁöÁö·Â°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¸é ¾à 2.0¹èÀ̰í, ¿¬Á÷À¸·Î Ÿ¼³µÈ »Ñ¸®¸»¶ÒÀÇ °æ¿ì¿Í ºñ±³Çϸé 13%ÀÇ ÁöÁö·Â Áõ´ëÈ¿°ú°¡ ÀÖ´Ù. ±×¸®°í ÃÖÀûŸ¼³°æ»ç°¢¿¡¼­ÀÇ »Ñ¸®¸»¶ÒÀÇ ÀιßÀúÇ×·ÂÀº ¿¬Á÷À¸·Î Ÿ¼³µÈ »Ñ¸®¸»¶ÒÀÇ °æ¿ì ¿¡ ºñÇØ 21%ÀÇ ÀιßÀúÇ×·Â Áõ´ëÈ¿°ú°¡ ÀÖ´Ù. ¾ÐÃà½ÃÇèÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ ¾òÀº ÇÏÁß-ħÇÏ·®°î¼±Àº Ÿ¼³ °æ»ç°¢ÀÌ ¾ø´Â °æ¿ì¿¡ Àü¹ÝÀü´ÜÆÄ±« ÇüŸ¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¸ç,Ÿ¼³°æ»ç°¢ÀÌ 5$^{circ}$, $10^{circ}$ÀÎ °æ¿ì, ÇÏÁßÀº ±ØÇÑ ÁöÁö·Â¿¡ µµ´ÞÇÑ ÈÄ ÀÏÁ¤ÇÑ °ªÀ» À¯ÁöÇÏ´Â ¾ç»óÀ» º¸ÀδÙ. Ÿ¼³°æ»ç°¢ÀÌ 15$^{circ}$, 20$^{circ}$, 25$^{circ}$·Î Áõ°¡Çϸ鼭 ÇÏÁßÀº ±ØÇÑÁöÁö·Â¿¡ µµ´ÞÇÑ ÈÄ¿¡µµ °è¼Ó Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­, Ÿ¼³°æ»ç°¢ÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ìÀÇ »Ñ¸®¸»¶ÒÀº ¾ÐÃàÁöÁö·ÂÀ» ÃʰúÇÏ¿© ÇÏÁßÀ» ¹Þ´õ¶óµµ ±Þ°ÝÇÑ ÆÄ±«¿¡ À̸£Áö ¾Ê°í Á¡Â÷·Î º¯À§°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â ¿¬¼º (ductile)°Åµ¿À» º¸ÀÏ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµÈ´Ù.
In order to investigate the influence of slanting angle of reticulated root piles(RRP) on their bearing capacities, model tests of compressive and uplift loads on RRP with different slanting angles, which were installed in sandy soils with a relative density of 47%, were carried out. Each pile which is made of a steel bar of 5mm in diameter and 300mm in length, is coated with sand to be 6.5mm in diameter. One set of RRP consists of 8 piles which are installed in circular patterns forming two concentric circles, each of which has 4 piles. Slanting angles of RRP for load tests are 0$^{circ}$, 5$^{circ}$, 10$^{circ}$, 15$^{circ}$, 20$^{circ}$, and 25$^{circ}$. In addition, compressive load tests on circular footing whose diameter is the same as the outer circle of RRP were carried out. Test results show that maximum load bearing capacities of RRP by regression analysis are obtained at about 12$^{circ}$ and 13$^{circ}$ of slanting angles for compressive and uplift load tests, respectively. Maximum compressive bearing capacity is estimated to be 13oA bigger than that of the vertical RRP and 95% bigger than that of surface footing. Maximum uplift capacity is estimated to be 21% bigger than that of the vertical RRP. And it can be appreciated that increasing the slanting angle makes the load -Settlement behavior more ductile.
 
Ű¿öµå
Slanting Angle;Reticulated Root;Pile;Bearing Capacity;Compressive Test;Uplift Test;Circular Shallow Footing;General Shear Failure;Ductile Behavior;
 
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸÁö:Áö¹Ý / v.12, no.2, 1996³â, pp.71-84
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-215X
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199611920446447)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿