¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ / v.12, no.5, 1996³â, pp.63-78
ÅðÀû¿¬¾ÏÀÇ ºñ¼±ÇüƯ¼º Á¶»ç.½ÃÇè±â¹ý¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( A Study on Field and Laboratory Test Methods to Obtain Non-linear Deformation Characteristics of Soft Rocks )
±èÀ¯¼º; Á¤È¸¿ø, ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñȯ°æ°øÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÅðÀû¿¬¾ÏÀÇ º¯ÇüƯ¼ºÀ» Á¶»çÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ¿©·¯ Á¾·ùÀÇ ½Ç³»½ÃÇè°ú ¿øÀ§Ä¡½ÃÇè°á°ú¸¦ ºñ±³°ËÅä ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃÊÀ½ÆÄÃøÁ¤½ÃÇè µîÀÇ ½Ç³»½ÃÇè¿¡¼­ ºÒ±¸¼Ó ½Ã·áÀÇ Åº¼º°è¼ö´Â ¿øÀ§Ä¡À¯È¿ÅäÇǾп¡ ÇØ´çÇÏ´Â ¾Ð¹Ð±¸¼Ó¾ÐÀ¸·Î ±¸¼ÓÇÑ ½Ã·áÀÇ Åº¼º°è¼ö º¸´Ù ÇöÀúÈ÷ ÀÛ¾Ò´Ù. ¶Ç »ïÃà¾ÐÃà½ÃÇè¿¡¼­ ÀçÇÏÇÇ ½ºÅæÀÇ ÃຯÀ§·Î ºÎÅÍ ±¸ÇÑ ÃຯÇü·üÀº ½Ã·á »ó.ÇÏ´Ü¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¿ÀÂ÷(bedding error)·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© Á¤È®È÷ ÃøÁ¤ÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø°í, ÀüüÀûÀ¸·Î ½Å·ÚÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ½Ã·áÃø¸é¿¡¼­ Á÷Á¢ º¯Çü·üÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ´Â ±¹¼Òº¯ÇüÃøÁ¤ÀåÄ¡¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© 0.001% ÀÌÇÏ¿¡¼­ ¾à 1%±îÁö ¿¬¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î À§¿Í °°Àº ¿ÀÂ÷¸¦ Á¦°ÅÇÑ ÃຯÇü·üÀ» ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú°í, 0.00% ÀÌÇÏ ÃຯÇü·ü¿¡¼­ Á¤ÀÇµÈ Åº¼º°è¼ö Emax´Â ¿øÀ§Ä¡Åº¼º ÆÄ¼Óµµ½ÃÇèÀ¸·Î ¾ò¾îÁø ź¼º°è¼ö Er¿Í °ÅÀÇ ÀÏÄ¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. º¯Çü·üÀÌ 0.01%¿¡ µµ´ÞÇϱâ ÀÌÀü¿¡ º¯ÇüÀº ºñ¼±Çü¼ºÀ» º¸À̱⠽ÃÀÛÇϰí, ½ÇÁ¦ ¿øÀ§Ä¡ ÀÛ¿ëÇÏÁß ¹üÀ§¿¡¼­ ¿¹»óÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Ãִ뺯Çü·ü 0.1%¿¡¼­ÀÇ ÇÒ¼±Åº¼º°è¼ö Esec´Â EmaxÀÇ 1/2º¸´Ù ¿©ÀüÈ÷ Å« °ªÀ» º¸ÀδÙ. À§¿Í °°Àº ³»¿ëÀ» °ñÀÚ·Î ÇÏ¿© Á¤¹ÐÃøÁ¤½Ç³»½ÃÇè °á°ú¿¡ µû¸¥ º¯ÇüƯ¼º°ú ÇöÀå°Åµ¿ ¹× ¿øÀ§Ä¡ÃøÁ¤°á°úÀÇ ºñ±³°ËÅ並 ÅëÇØ º¯Çü·ü·¹º§À» °í·ÁÇÑ ¿øÀ§Ä¡ ź¼º°è¼ö ÃßÁ¤¹ýÀ» Á¦¾ÈÇÏ¿´´Ù.
Various type of in-situ and laboratary tests were performed in order to evaluate the stiffness of sedimentary soft rock. In triaxial compression tests of sedimentary soft rocks, axial strains from the axial displacement of the loading piston or specimen cap conventionally were considerably larger than those measured. tocally on the lateral surfaces of specimen, due to the bedding errors at the top and bottom ends of a specimen. A local deformation transducer was used to measure axial strains free from the bedding error ranging from 0.001% to about 1%. In ultra-sonic wave tests, the elastic modulus of unconfined spec imens was smaller than that of confined specimens, due probably to microfracks. Young's modulus Ed from ultra-sonic wave tests and those at small local strains from triaxial tests were similar, both of which agreed very well with Young's modulus Er from field shear wave velocities. Young'a modulus from the field behaviour was virtually similar to that obtained by reducing Er based on the strain level-dependency of stiffness evaluated by the triaxial tests.
 
Ű¿öµå
Stiffness;Deformation;In-situ tests;Triaxial test;Strain-level dependency;
 
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸÁö:Áö¹Ý / v.12, no.5, 1996³â, pp.63-78
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-215X
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199611920446837)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿