¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ / v.13, no.1, 1997³â, pp.169-182
Ç¥ÁذüÀÔ½ÃÇèÀÇ µ¿ÀûÈ¿À² ÃøÁ¤
( Rod Energy Ratio Measurement of SPT )
ÀÌÈ£Ãá;±èº´ÀÏ;¹Ú¿ë¿ø; ¸íÁöÀü¹®´ëÇÐ Åä¸ñ°ú;¸íÁö´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ Åä¸ñ¡¤È¯°æ°øÇаú, ¸íÁö´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ Åä¸ñ¡¤È¯°æ°øÇаú;;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
Ç¥ÁذüÀÔ½ÃÇè¿¡¼­ ÇØ¸Ó°¡ ³«ÇÏÇÏ¿© ¹ß»ýÇÑ Ãæ°Ý¿¡³ÊÁö°¡ »ùÇ÷¯¿¡ Àü´ÞµÇ´Â °úÁ¤¿¡ ¿©·¯ °¡Áö Á¦ÇÑ ¹× ¹®Á¦Á¡ ¶§¹®¿¡ ¿¡³ÊÁö ¼Õ½ÇÀÌ ÀϾ°Ô ¸¶·ÃÀÌ´Ù. ½ÃÇè°á°üÀÎ NÄ¡¸¦ º¸Á¤Çϱâ À§Çؼ­´Â ·Îµå¿¡ Àü´ÞµÇ´Â ¿¡³ÊÁö ¼öÁØÀÌ ÃøÁ¤µÇ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â Ãæ°Ý¿¡³ÊÁö¿Í ¸ð·ç¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿µ ·Îµå¿¡ Àü´ÞµÇ¸é¼­ ¼Õ½ÇµÈ ¿¡³ÊÁö°¡ ¹Ý¿µµÈ ·Îµå ¿¡³ÊÁöÀÇ ºñÀ² Áï, Ç¥ÁذüÀÔ½ÃÇèÀÇ µ¿Àû È¿¿ïÀ» Charpy Ãæ°Ý½ÃÇèÀåÄ¡¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÃøÁ¤Çϰí, Çן ºÐ¼® ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÎ GRL-WEAPÇØ¼®°ú ÇöÀå½ÃÇèÀ¸·Î ºñ±³ ¹× È®ÀÎ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú R-PÇØ¸Ó¿Í ¹Ùµ¿ÇظÓÀÇ µ¿ÀûǥȿÀ²ÀÌ 0.726°ú 0.728·Î °¢°¢ »êÁ¤µÇ¾úÀ¸³ª 0.72·Î °°°Ô Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ °ª¿¡ ÇöÀåÃøÁ¤ÇÑ ÇØ¸Ó¿¡³ÊÁö ¼öÁØ 64.2%(R-P)¹× 75.%(ÀÚµ¿)¸¦ Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© ÃøÁ¤ N °¡Ä¡¸¦ º¸Á¤ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â SPTÀÇ Æò±Õ¿¡³ÊÁöºñ¸¦ 46.7% ¹× 54.5%È£ »êÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
It is known that some amount of loss in impact energy takes place due to some limitations and problems during the performance of the field SPT. Actual energy level tractsferred to the rod should be measured to correct the SPT-N values tested in the field In this paper, the ratio of energy transferred to the rod through the anvil to impact energy is measured by using sharpy impact test equipment and also analysed by using GRL-WEAP This result is certified and compared with that of field SPT As the results of this study, the average rod energy ratio of the R-P hammer and the Trip hammer is calculated at 0.726 and 0.728 respectively, but it is suggested that 0.72 should be used. By using the hammer energy ratio 64.2% and 75.0% obtained from field measurement, the average energy ratio of the SPT for the R-P hammer is calculated at 46.7% and 54.5% for the Trip hammer.
 
Ű¿öµå
Rod energy ratio;Average energy ratio;R-P Hammer;Trip hammer;
 
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸÁö:Áö¹Ý / v.13, no.1, 1997³â, pp.169-182
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-215X
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199711920447212)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿