¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ / v.14, no.3, 1998³â, pp.95-108

( Development of an Inversion Analysis Technique for Downhole Testing and Continuous Seismic CPT )
;; ;;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
Áö¹ÝÀÇ SÆÄ ¹× PÆÄÀÇ ±íÀÌ¿¡ µû¸¥ º¯È­¸¦ ¿øÀ§Ä¡¿¡¼­ ÃøÁ¤Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ´Ù¿îÈê ½ÃÇè (downhole testing)°ú SCPT (seismic CPT) µîÀÌ ³Î¸® »ç¿ëµÇ¾î ¿Ô´Ù. ´Ù¿îȦ ½ÃÇè°ú SCPT´Â °æÁ¦¼º, ¿î¿ëÀÇ ¿ëÀ̼º, ¹ßÁø¿øÀÇ ´Ü¼ø¼º µîÀÇ Ãø¸é¿¡¼­ È¿À²ÀûÀ̱⠶§¹®¿¡, ÇöÀç Áö¹ÝÁ¶»ç¿¡¼­ ±× »ç¿ëºóµµ°¡ ´õ¿í Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ´Â Ãß¼¼ÀÌ´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ÃÖ±Ù¿¡´Â ´Ù¿îÈê°ú SCPTÀÇ ÀÚ·á ºÐ¼®À» ÀÚµ¿È­Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ³ë·ÂÀÇ ÀÏȯÀ¸·Î interval measurementsÀÇ ±â¹ýÀÌ È°¿ëµÇ°í Àִµ¥, ÇöÀç ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀûÀýÇÑ ¿ª»êÇØ¼® (inversion analysis) ±â¹ýÀÌ ¾ø´Â ÇüÆíÀÌ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­, º» ³í¹®¿¡¼­´Â ´Ù¿îȦÀ̳ª SCPTÀÇ interval measurements¸¦ ºÐ¼®Çϱâ À§ÇÑ »õ·Î¿î ¿ª»êÇØ¼® ±â¹ýÀ» Á¦¾ÈÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¦¾ÈµÈ ¿ª»êÇØ¼® ±â¹ýÀÇ Á¤¸ðµ¨¸µ(forward modeling)¿¡¼­´Â ź¼ºÆÄÀÇ ÀüÆÄ¸¦ SnellÀÇ ¹ýÄ¢¿¡ ÀǰÅÇÏ¿© ±¼Àý.¹Ý»çµÇ´Â Çö»óÀ» °í·ÁÇÏ¿´°î, ¿ª»êÇØ¼®À» À§Çؼ­´Â ÃÖ´ë°ø»ê¹ý (maximum likelihood method)À» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×¸®°í, º» ³í¹®¿¡¼­ Á¦¾ÈÇÑ ¿ª»êÇØ¼® ±â¹ýÀÇ °ËÁõÀ» À§ÇÏ¿©, ÇϳªÀÇ SÆÄ Áֻ󵵸¦ °¡Á¤Çϰí ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ´Ù¿îÈê ½ÃÇèÀ» ¸ð»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ·ÐÀûÀ¸·Î ¼öÇàÇÑ ´Ù¿îȦ ½ÃÇè °á°ú¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ºñ ¿ª»êÇØ¼® ¹æ¹ý°ú º» ³í¹®¿¡¼­ Á¦¾ÈÇÑ ¿ª»êÇØ ¼® ±â¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇØ¼­ SÆÄ Áֻ󵵸¦ ÃßÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Âµ¥, ±× °á°ú º» ³í¹®¿¡¼­ Á¦½ÃÇÑ ¿ª»ê±â¹ýÀÌ °¡Àå Á¤È®ÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ µµÃâÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ´Ù¿îȦ ½ÃÇè°ú SCPTÀ» ÀÚµ¿È­Çϴµ¥ È¿À²ÀûÀ¸·Î Àû¿ëÀÌ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ½À» ÀÔÁõÇÏ¿´´Ù.
Downhole testing and seismic CPT (SCPT) have been widely used to evaluate stiffness profiles of the subgrade. Advantages of downhole testing and SCPT such as low cost, easy operation and a simple seismic source have got these testings more frequently adopted in site investigation. For the automated analysis of downhole testing and SCPT, the concept of interval measurements has been practiced. In this paper. a new inversion procedure to deal tilth the interval measurements for the automated downhole testing and SCPT (including a newlydeveloped continuous SCPT) is proposed. The forward modeling in the new inversion procedure incorporates ray path theory based on Snell's law. The formulation for the inversion analysis is derived from the maximum likelihood approach, which estimates the maximum likelihood of obtaining a particular travel time from a source to a receiver. Verification of the new inversion procedure was performed with numerical simulations of SCPT using synthesized profiles. The results of the inversion analyses performed for the synthetic data show that the new inversion analysis is a valid procedure which enhances Va profiles determined by downhole testing and SCPT.
 
Ű¿öµå
Downhole testing;Seismic CPT;Shear wave velocity profile;Inversion;Site investigation;Seismic measurements;
 
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸÁö:Áö¹Ý / v.14, no.3, 1998³â, pp.95-108
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-215X
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199811920448151)
¾ð¾î : ¿µ¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿