|
|
|
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ / v.8, no.3, 1992³â, pp.13-22
|
ÇÏÁß ¹æÇâ(¾ÐÃà-Àιß)°ú ¸»¶Ò Á÷°æÀÌ ¸»¶ÒÀÇ ÁöÁö·Â¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ -½Ç³»¸ðÇü½ÃÇè-
( The Effect of Load Direction and Pile Size on the Pile Bearing Capacity : Model Pile Tests ) |
| ÀÌÀθð;¹é¼¼È¯; Á¤È¸¿ø, °í·Á´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñȯ°æ°øÇаú;Á¤È¸¿ø, (ÁÖ)°í·Á±âÃÊ¿¬±¸¼Ò ´ëÇ¥ÀÌ»ç, Á¤È¸¿ø Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼ú¿ø Åä¸ñ°øÇаú ¹Ú»ç°úÁ¤, Á¤È¸¿ø, °í·Á´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø Åä¸ñȯ°æ°øÇаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
|
|
| Model pile tests using calibration chamber are performed in !his paper in order to clarify the effect of the fundamental differences between the newly developed SPLT(Simple Pile Loading Test)and the conventional pile loading test on the pile bearing capacity. They are : (1) the direction of the applied load to mobilize the skin friction ; and (2) the use of reduced sifted sliding core. The conclusions obtained from the model pile tests are as follows : (1) The skin friction in tension loading is found to be somewhat smaller than that in compression loading. The average ration is 0.73 with the coefficient of variation (COV) of 0.18. (2) The ratio of the tip resistance rosin¿¬ the reduced sized sliding core to that using the whole shoe shows wide scattering ; its average is 0.99 and the COV is 0.28. The aver - age of 0.99 means that there is no considerable difference in the tip resistance whether the reduced sized sliding core or the whole shoe is used, on condition that penetration depth ratio is larger than 4 : if the boundary effect of the chamber test is considered, the resistance of the whole shoe might be even larger. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸÁö:Áö¹Ý / v.8, no.3, 1992³â, pp.13-22
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-215X
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199211920444674)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|