¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ / v.15, no.5, 1999³â, pp.259-279
±¼Âø¸ðÇü½ÇÇèÀ» ÅëÇÑ Åä·ùº®Ã¼ ¹× Áö¹Ý°Åµ¿¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( Model Tests for The Behavior of Propped Retaining Walls in Sand )
À̺À¿­;±èÇй®; ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ´Ù´Ü°è ±¼Âø½Ã ¿¬¼ºÅä·ù º®Ã¼ÀÇ ¼öÆòº¯Çü, ±¼Âø´Ü°èº° Åä¾Ðº¯È­ ¹× ºÐÆ÷, ±×¸®°í ¹è¸éÁö¹ÝÀÇ ÁöǥħÇÏ¿Í ÁöÁߺ¯À§ÀÇ ºÐÆ÷¸¦ ±Ô¸íÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© º®Ã¼°­¼º, º®¸¶ÂûÀÇ À¯¹« ¹× Áö¹ÝÁ¶°Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ±¼Âø¸ðÇü½ÇÇèÀ» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸ðÇü½ÇÇè °á°ú º®Ã¼°­¼º ¹× º®Ã¼¿Í ¹è¸éÁö¹ÝÀÇ º®¸¶Âû°¢¿¡ À¯¹«¿¡ µû¸¥ ÁöǥħÇÏ ÇüÅ´ ´Ù¼Ò Â÷À̸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾úÀ¸¸ç, ÁöÁߺ¯À§ °á°ú´Â ÃÖ´ëÁöÁߺ¯À§ÀÇ ¹ß»ý½Éµµ´Â ½Éµµºñ 0.1H¿¡¼­ 0.15H(H´Â ÃÖÁ¾±¼Âø½Éµµ)ÀÇ ¹üÀ§¿¡¼­ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ±×¸®°í º®Ã¼ÀÇ °­¼º¿¡ µû¶ó ¹è¸éÁö¹ÝÀÇ Åä¾ÐÀçºÐ¹è Çö»óÀÎ ¾ÆÄªÈ¿°ú´Â º®Ã¼°­¼º°ú Áö¹ÝÁ¶°Ç¿¡ Á÷Á¢ÀûÀÎ °ü°è°¡ ÀÖÀ½À» È®ÀÎÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ¸ðÇü½ÇÇè¿¡¼­ ¾òÀº º®Ã¼º¯À§ ¹× Åä¾ÐºÐÆ÷´Â ±âÁ¸ ź¼Ò¼ºº¸¹ý ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À¸·Î ¶ÇÇÑ ÁöǥħÇÏ ¹× ÁöÁߺ¯À§´Â º» ¿¬±¸Áø¿¡ ÀÇÇØ °³¹ßµÈ GDHM Àç·á¸ðµ¨À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò¹ý ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À¸·Î °¢°¢ ºñ±³ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±âÁ¸ ź¼Ò¼ºº¸¹ý ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¸ðÇü½ÇÇèÀ» ÇØ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú º®Ã¼º¯À§ ¹× Åä¾ÐºÐÆ÷´Â ¸ðÇü½ÇÇè °á°ú¿Í »óÀÌÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾úÀ¸¸ç, GDHM Àç·á¸ðµ¨À» Àû¿ëÇÑ À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒÇØ¼®¿¡¼­´Â º®Ã¼¼öÆòº¯À§ÀÇ ÇüÅ´ ´Ù¼Ò »óÀÌÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾úÀ¸³ª ¹è¸éÁö¹ÝÀÇ ÁöÁߺ¯À§ ºÐÆ÷´Â º®Ã¼°­¼º¿¡ µû¶ó¼­ À¯»çÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
Model tests on propped retaining walls were performed for the investigation of wall displacement, distribution of earth pressure, surface settlement and underground movement at various excavation stage in sand. The result of model tests on the trough of surface settlement showed considerable difference depending on the characteristic of wall stiffness, wall friction and soil condition. The location of maximum underground movement were found to be at range of 0.15H to 0. 1H(H: Final excavation depth). Effect of arching by the redistribution of earth pressure were closely related to the stiffness of wall as well as the soil condition. The wall displacement and earth pressure distribution were simulated by elasto - plastic beam analysis program and finite element method with GDHM model respectively. The result of elasto-plastic analysis showed some discrepancy on the wall displacement and earth pressure, but result of underground movement by FEM with various wall stiffness were in good agreement with the model tests.
 
Ű¿öµå
Underground settlement;Surface settlement;Earth pressure;Wall displacement;Arching effect;Numerical Analysis;GDHM Model;Elasto-Plastic Analysis;
 
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.15, no.5, 1999³â, pp.259-279
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-2427
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199911921749679)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿