|
|
|
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ / v.25, no.10, 2009³â, pp.17-30
|
ÀÌÃà¾ÐÃà Á¶°Ç¿¡¼ °øµ¿ÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â À¯»ç Àý¸®¾Ï¹Ý ¸ðµ¨ÀÇ ÆÄ±« °Åµ¿
( Fracture Behaviors of Jointed Rock Model Containing an Opening Under Biaxial Compression Condition ) |
| »ç°ø¸í;À¯ÀçÈ£;¹ÚµÎÈñ;ÀÌÁؼ®; Çѱ¹Ã¶µµ±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø öµµ±¸Á¶¿¬±¸½Ç;ÇѾç´ëÇб³/Çѱ¹Ã¶µµ±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø;ÇѾç´ëÇб³ °Ç¼³°øÇаú;Çѱ¹Ã¶µµ±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø öµµ±¸Á¶¿¬±¸½Ç;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| ÁöÇÏ¿¡ °øµ¿À» °Ç¼³ÇÏ´Â ÅͳΠ°ø»çÀÇ °æ¿ì Ãʱâ ÀÀ·ÂÀÇ ÁýÁß ¹× ¹ßÆÄ¿Í °°Àº ½Ã°ø´Ü°è¿¡¼ÀÇ °úµµÇÑ ¿¡³ÊÁöÀÇ Àû¿ëÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© ÁÖº¯ ¾Ï¹Ý¿¡ ¼Õ»óÀ» ¹ß»ý½ÃŲ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼Õ»óÀÇ ¹ß»ýÀº Åͳο¡ ÀÛ¿ëÇÏ´Â ÇÏÁß ¹× ÅͳΠÁÖº¯ ¾Ï¹ÝÀÇ È帧Á¶°Ç¿¡ »ó´çÇÑ ¿µÇâÀ» ³¢Ä£´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÀÌÀ¯·Î ÅͳΠÁÖº¯¿¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ¼Õ»ó±¸°£¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¿¬±¸°¡ ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â À¯»ç¾Ï¼®À¸·Î Á¦ÀÛµÈ °øµ¿ÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â Àý¸®¸ðµ¨ÀÇ ÀÌÃà¾ÐÃà½ÇÇèÀ» ÅëÇÏ¿© °øµ¿ÁÖº¯ÀÇ ¼Õ»ó¹ß»ýÀ» ¿¬±¸ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àý¸®¸éÀº ¼öÆò¸é°ú $30^{circ}$, $45^{circ}$, $60^{circ}$ÀÇ Á¶°ÇÀ¸·Î Çü¼ºµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ÃÊÁ¶°½Ã¸àÆ® Àç·á¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© À¯»çÀý¸®¸ðµ¨À» Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌÃà¾ÐÃà ½ÇÇè°á°ú °øµ¿ÁÖº¯¿¡¼´Â Àý¸®¸é¿¡ ¼öÁ÷ÇÑ ¹æÇâÀ¸·Î ÀÎÀå±Õ¿ÀÇ ¹ß»ýÀÌ °üÃøµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ±Õ¿ÀÇ ÁøÇàÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© ¾Ï¹Ýºí·ÏÀÌ Çü¼ºµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ÁøÇàÇÏ´Â ÀÎÀå±Õ¿ÀÌ ´Ù¸¥ Àý¸®¸é¿¡ µµ´ÞÇÏ¿© ¾Ï¹Ýºí·ÏÀÌ ¿ÏÀüÈ÷ Çü¼ºµÈ °æ¿ì Å»¶ôÇÏ´Â °úÁ¤À» º¸¿´´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÀÎÀå±Õ¿ÀÇ ÁøÀüÀº Àý¸®¸éÀÇ °¢µµ¿¡ µû¶ó »óÀÌÇѵ¥ Àý¸®¸éÀÇ °¢µµ°¡ Ŭ¼ö·Ï ¾ÈÁ¤ÀûÀ̸ç ÁøÇ༺ÀÇ ±Õ¿ ÁøÀü ¾ç»óÀÌ °üÃøµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÀÎÀå±Õ¿ÀÇ ¹ß´ÞÀº Àý¸®¸éÀ¸·Î ±¸¼ºµÈ ¾ÏÆíÀ» º¸·Î °¡Á¤ ÇÒ °æ¿ì °øµ¿ÀÇ °î·ü·Î ÀÎÇÑ ±âÇÏÇÐÀû Çü»óÀÇ ºÒ±ÔÄ¢¼ºÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© ¸ð¸àÆ®°¡ ÀÛ¿ëÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. ÀÌ»óÀÇ ½ÇÇè°á°ú¸¦ ÀÔÀÚ¿ä¼ÒÇØ¼® ¹æ¹ýÀ» ±â¹ÝÀ¸·Î ÇÏ´Â PFC 2D¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¸ð»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇØ¼®°á°ú ½ÇÇè¿¡¼ °üÃøÇÑ ¹Ù¿Í °°ÀÌ Àý¸®¸é °¢µµ°¡ ÀÛÀ»¼ö·Ï ¼Õ»ó´ëÀÇ ÆøÀº ³Ð¾îÁö¸ç ÀÎÀå±Õ¿ÀÇ ÁøÇà¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¾Ï¹Ýºí·ÏÀÇ Çü¼ºÀÌ °üÃøµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ »óÈ£ÀÛ¿ëÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ±Õ¿À» Á¶»çÇÑ °á°ú ¼öÄ¡ÇØ¼®¿¡¼µµ Àý¸®¸éÀÇ °¢µµ°¡ ÀÛÀº Á¶°Ç¿¡¼ ÁøÇ༺ÀÇ ÆÄ±«°¡ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. |
|
| Underground construction such as tunneling can induce damages on the surrounding rock mass, due to the stress concentration of in situ stresses and excessive energy input during construction sequence, such as blasting. The developed damage on the rock mass can have substantial influence on the mechanical and hydraulic behaviors of the rock masses around a tunnel. In this study, investigation on the generation of damage around an opening in a jointed rock model under biaxial compression condition was conducted. The joint dip angles employed are 30, 45, and 60 degrees to the horizontal, and the synthetic rock mass was made using early strength cement and water. From the biaxial compression test, initiation and propagation of tensile cracks at norm to the joint angle were found. The propagated tensile cracks eventually developed rock blocks, which were dislodged from the rock mass. Furthermore, the propagation process of the tensile cracks varies with joint angle: lower joint angle model shows more stable and progressive tensile crack propagation. The development of the tensile crack can be explained under the hypothesis that the rock segment encompassed by the joint set is subjected to the developing moment, which can be induced by the geometric irregularity around the opening in the rock model. The experiment results were simulated by using discrete element method PFC 2D. From the simulation, as has been observed from the test, a rock mass with lower joint angle produces wider damage region and rock block by tensile cracks. In addition, a rock model with lower joint angle shows progressive tensile cracks generation around the opening from the investigation of the interacted tensile cracks. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| Jointed rock model;Synthetic rock model;Biaxial compression;PFC 2D; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.25, no.10, 2009³â, pp.17-30
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-2427
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200919061727098)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|