¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ / v.26, no.6, 2010³â, pp.57-70
ÅͳΠȾ¹æÇâ ÁöÁøÇؼ® Part I: ÀÀ´äº¯À§¹ýÀ» ÅëÇÑ ÅͳÎÀÇ ÁöÁøÀÀ´ä ¿¹Ãø
( Seismic Analysis of Tunnel in Transverse Direction Part I: Estimation of Seismic Tunnel Response via Method of Seismic Displacement )
¹ÚµÎÈñ;½ÅÁ¾È£;À±¼¼¿õ; ÇѾç´ëÇб³ °Ç¼³È¯°æ°øÇаú;ÇѾç´ëÇб³ °Ç¼³È¯°æ°øÇаú;ÇѾç´ëÇб³ °Ç¼³È¯°æ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÁöÁø¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© »ó´çÈ÷ ÀúÇ×·ÂÀÌ ³ô´Ù°í ¾Ë·ÁÁø Åͳεµ ÃÖ±Ù ±¹¿Ü¿¡¼­ ¹ß»ýÇÑ ´ë ÁöÁøµé¿¡ ÀÇÇØ¼­ ½É°¢ÇÑ ÇÇÇØ¸¦ ÀÔÀº »ç·Ê°¡ Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î ¹ß»ýÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç ÅͳΠ³»Áø¼³°èÀÇ Çʿ伺À» ÀÔÁõÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ÁöÁøµ¿¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© Åͳο¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ º¯Çü¸ðµå Áß¿¡¼­ Ⱦ¹æÇâ Àü´Üº¯ÇüÀÌ °¡Àå Ä¡¸íÀûÀÎ ¸ðµå·Î ¾Ë·ÁÁ³´Ù. º» ³í¹®¿¡¼­´Â Ⱦ¹æÇâ ÅͳÎÀÇ ÁöÁøÇؼ®À» À¯»çÁ¤ÀûÇØ¼®ÀÇ ÀÏÁ¾ÀÎ ÀÀ´äº¯À§¹ýÀ¸·Î ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸ÕÀú, Áö¹Ý ³» º¯À§¸¦ °è»êÇÑ °á°ú ´ÜÀÏ ¹× ÀÌÁß ÄÚ»çÀιýÀÇ ¿¹Ãø°á°ú´Â Á¤È®ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ» ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸´Ï ÁÖÀÇÇØ¾ß Çϸç 1Â÷¿ø Áö¹ÝÀÀ´äÇØ¼®À» ¼öÇàÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÀûÀýÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ³ª¾Æ°¡ ÅͳÎÀÇ ÀÀ´äÀ» ´Ü¼øÇØ, ÇØ¼®ÇØ, ±×¸®°í ¿¬¼Óü ¼öÄ¡ÇØ¼®À¸·Î °è»êÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºñ±³ °á°ú, ´Ü¼øÇØ´Â ÅͳÎÀÇ ÀÀ´äÀ» Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô ¿¹ÃøÇÏÁö ¸øÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÇØ¼®ÇØ´Â ±ÕÁú Áö¹Ý°ú ¿øÇüÅͳο¡¼­´Â ÀûÀýÇϳª ºñ±ÕÁú Áö¹Ý¿¡¼­´Â ÀûÀýÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¼öÄ¡ÇØ¼®Àº ¸ðµç °æ¿ì¿¡ Àû¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ °¡Àå Á¤È®ÇÑ ¹æ¹ýÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ¼±ÇüÇØ¼®Àº º¸¼öÀûÀ̸ç Áö¹ÝÀÇ ºñ¼±Çü¼ºÀ» °í·ÁÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÀûÀýÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
Recent earthquakes have demonstrated that the tunnels, which were once considered to be highly resistant to earthquakes, are susceptible to substantial damage under severe seismic loading. Among various modes of deformation under an earthquake loading, the response of the tunnel in the transverse direction is known to be the critical mode. This paper investigates the seismic response of the tunnel in the transverse direction using the method of seismic displacement, which is a type of pseudo-static analysis. Firstly, the methods of calculating the ground deformation are compared. It is shown that the single and double cosine may not provide an accurate estimation of the ground deformation, and that a one-dimensional site response analysis needs to be performed for a more reliable evaluation. Secondly, the tunnel responses are calculated using the simplified, analytical, and numerical solutions. It is demonstrated that the simplified method provides poor estimates of the tunnel response ground deformation. The analytical solution is shown to be effective in modeling circular tunnels in uniform ground, but has serious limitation in modeling tunnel response in non-uniform ground. Numerical analyses are shown to be applicable to all cases, and give the most accurate estimates of the tunnel response. It is also demonstrated that the linear solutions can be so conservative that the soil nonlinearity needs to be accounted for more accurate evaluation of the tunnel response.
 
Ű¿öµå
Bending stress;Method of seismic displacement;Transverse direction;Tunnel;Seismic analysis;
 
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.26, no.6, 2010³â, pp.57-70
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-2427
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201030853095385)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿