¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ / v.19, no.6, 2003³â, pp.227-243
¹Ì²ø¸² ¹æÁöÅÎÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ °­°ü¸»¶Ò ¸Ó¸® °áÇÕºÎÀÇ ±¸Á¶Æ¯¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ½ÇÇèÀû ¿¬±¸
( The Structural Characteristics of Non-slip Device in Connecting Method Between Steel Pipe Pile and Footing )
¹Ú¿µÈ£;±è³«¿µ; Çѱ¹µµ·Î°ø»ç µµ·Î±³Åë±â¼ú¿ø Áö¹Ý¿¬±¸±×·ì;Çѱ¹µµ·Î°ø»ç µµ·Î±³Åë±â¼ú¿ø Áö¹Ý¿¬±¸±×·ì;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
°­°ü¸»¶ÒÀÇ ¼Óä¿ò ÄÜÅ©¸®Æ® B¹æ¹ý¿¡¼­ ¹Ì²ø¸²¹æÁöÅÎÀÇ ±¸Á¶ÀûÀΠƯ¼ºÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§ÇÏ¿©, °­°ü¸»¶Ò¸Ó¸®ÀÇ ³»ºÎ¿¡ ¹Ì²ø¸²¹æÁöÅÎÀ» ¼³Ä¡ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº ½ÃÇèü¿Í 2´ÜÀÇ °î·ü °­Æí ¹Ì²ø¸²¹æÁöÅÎÀ» °­°ü¸»¶Ò³»ºÎ¿¡ ¿ëÁ¢ÇÑ ½ÃÇèü(½Ã¹æ¼­ ¹æ¹ý), ±×¸®°í ¹Ì²ø¸²¹æÁöÅÎÀ» ´Ù¼öÀÇ °î·ü °­Æí°ú °íÀå·Âº¼Æ®·Î ü°áÇÑ ½ÃÇèü(°³¹ßÇü ¹æ¹ý)¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ½Ç¹°Å©±â ÀÎ¹ß ¹× ¾Ð¹ß ½ÇÇèÀ» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× °á°ú, ¹Ì²ø¸²¹æÁöÅÎÀÌ ¾ø´Â ½ÃÇèü´Â ÃÖ´ëÀιßÇÏÁß 15.6tonf¿¡¼­, ÃÖ´ë¾Ð¹ßÇÏÁß 27.57tonf¿¡¼­ ÄÜÅ©¸®Æ®ÀÇ È­ÇÐÀû ºÎÂøÆÄ±«°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×¸®°í ¹Ì²ø¸²¹æÁöÅÎÀÌ ÀÖ´Â ½Ã¹æ¼­ ¹æ¹ý°ú °³¹ßÇü ¹æ¹ýÀÇ ½ÃÇèü´Â ¾ø´Â ½ÃÇèüº¸´Ù ÃÖ´ëÀιßÇÏÁßÀÇ ¾à 8.9¹è¿Í ÃÖ´ë¾Ð¹ßÇÏÁßÀÇ 6.2¹è Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ½Ã¹æ¼­ ¹æ¹ý°ú °³¹ßÇü ¹æ¹ýÀÇ ÇÏ´Ü ¹Ì²ø¸²¹æÁöÅο¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇÏÁߺдãºñÀ²Àº °ÅÀÇ µ¿ÀÏÇÑ °Åµ¿À» º¸ÀÎ ¹Ý¸é¿¡, »ó´Ü ¹Ì²ø¸²¹æÁöÅÎÀº ½Ã¹æ¼­¹æ¹ýº¸´Ù °³¹ßÇü ¹æ¹ýÀÇ ÇÏÁߺдãºñÀ²ÀÌ Å©°Ô ±â¿©ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×¸®°í ½Ã¹æ¼­ ¹æ¹ý°ú °³¹ßÇü ¹æ¹ýÀÇ ¹Ì²ø¸²¹æÁöÅÎ Çü»ó¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÇÕ¼ºÀÛ¿ë°ú ±¸Á¶¼º´ÉÀº °ÅÀÇ µ¿ÀÏÇÏ¿´´Ù.
To find the structural characteristics of non-slip device in connecting method B between steel pipe pile and concrete footing, compression and uplift test was performed for full sized specimens not having non-slip device, those having non-slip device with two curved steel plate bars welded inside the steel pipe pile(standard method), and those having non-slip device with serveral curved steel plate bars bolted inside the steel pipe pile(new method). As a result, specimens not having non-slip device had chemical debonding failure at 15.6tonf of peak uplift load and 27.57tonf of peak compression load. And the standard method and the new method showed about 8.9 times of peak uplift load and 6.2 times of peak compression load higher than specimens not having non-slip device. The load transfers of lower non-slip devices of the standard method and the new method were similar in behavior, while the higher non-slip device of the new method showed higher ratio of load transfer than that of the standard method. And these two methods had nearly the same composite action and structural capacity caused by non-slip devices,
 
Ű¿öµå
Composite action;Connecting method B;New method;Non-slip device;
 
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.19, no.6, 2003³â, pp.227-243
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-2427
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200311922148006)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿