¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ / v.20, no.7, 2004³â, pp.127-140
ÁßÁøÁö¿ª¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÑ ¾×»óÈ­ Æò°¡ »ý·«±âÁØ ¹× ÁöÁø±Ô¸ð º¸Á¤°è¼ö¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( A Study on Magnitude Scaling Factors and Screening Limits of Liquefaction Potential Assessment in Moderate Earthquake Regions )
¹Ú±Ùº¸;¹Ú¿µ±Ù;ÃÖÀç¼ø;±è¼öÀÏ; ;;;;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¾×»óÈ­ Æò°¡¹ýÀº ´ëºÎºÐ ¹Ì±¹, ÀϺ», ±×¸®°í À¯·´°ú °°ÀÌ ÁöÁø ¹ß»ýºóµµ°¡ ³ô°í ±×·Î ÀÎÇÑ ¾×»óÈ­ ÇÇÇØ°¡ ºó¹øÇÑ ±¹°¡¿¡¼­ ÁÖµµÀûÀ¸·Î ¿¬±¸µÇ¾î¿Ô´Ù. ÀÌ·± Áö¿ªÀû Ư¼ºÀ» Åä´ë·Î °³¹ßµÈ ¾×»óÈ­ Æò°¡¹æ¹ýµéÀº ³ôÀº ÁöÁø±Ô¸ð(M=7.5)¿¡ ¹ÙÅÁÀ» µÎ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ±¹³»ÀÇ °æ¿ì, 1997³â ½ÇÁ¦ÀûÀÎ ³»Áø ¿¬±¸°¡ ½ÃÀÛµÈ ÀÌ·¡ ¾×»óÈ­ Æò°¡ÀÇ ±¸Ã¼Àû ±ÔÁ¤Àº Ç׸¸½Ã¼³ÀÇ ³»Áø¼³°è Ç¥Áؼ­(1999)¿¡ ¾ð±ÞµÈ ¹Ù ÀÖÀ¸³ª ÀÌ´Â ¹®Ç忬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇØ Á¦½ÃµÈ °ÍÀ¸·Î ½ÇÁ¦ÀûÀÌÁö ¸øÇÏ´Ù. ±×·¯¹Ç·Î, ±¹³» ÀûÇÕÇÑ ¼³°è±âÁØÀ» ÀÛ¼ºÇϱâ À§Çؼ­´Â ÁöÁøÇÇÇØÀÚ·áÀÇ ºÎÁ·À» ±¹³» Áö¹ÝÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÑ µ¿Àû½Ç³»½ÃÇèÀ» ÅëÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¹Ù¶÷Á÷Çϸç, ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ Á¤ÇöÇÏÁß Áøµ¿½ÃÇè º¸´Ù ½ÇÁ¦ ÁöÁøÇÏÁß ÀçÇÏ ½ÃÇèÀÌ ÈξÀ È¿°úÀûÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ½ÇÁ¦ ÁöÁøÆÄ °íÀ¯ÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÀ» Àû¿ëÇÑ Áøµ¿»ïÃà ½ÃÇèÀ» ÅëÇÏ¿© »ó´ë¹Ðµµ¿Í ¼¼¸³ºÐÇÔÀ¯·®ÀÇ º¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ ¾×»óÈ­ ÀúÇ×°­µµ¸¦ »êÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇè°á°ú¸¦ ±¹³»ÀÇ ´ëÇ¥ÀûÀÎ Ç׸¸Áö¿ªÀÇ ÁöÁøÀÀ´ä ÇØ¼® °á°ú¿Í ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®Çϰí ÁßÁøÁö¿ª¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÑ ¾×»óÈ­ Æò°¡ÀÇ »ý·«±âÁØÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ½ÇÁ¦ ÁöÁøÇÏÁß »ïÃà½ÇÇè °á°ú¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ±¹³» ¿©°Ç¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÑ ÁöÁø±Ô¸ð º¸Á¤°è¼ö¸¦ Á¦¾ÈÇÏ¿´´Ù.
Conventional methods for the assessment of liquefaction potential were primarily for areas of severe earthquake zones (M=7.5) such as North America and Japan. Detailed earthquake related researches in Korea started in 1997, including development of the seismic design standards for port and harbour structures, which was later completed in 1999. Because most contents in the guidelines were quoted through literature reviews from North America and Japan, which are located in strong earthquake region, those are not proper in Korea, a moderate earthquake region. This requires further improvement of the present guidelines. Considering earthquake hazard data in Korea, use of laboratory tests based on irregular earthquake motion appears to be effective to reflect the dynamic characteristics of soil more realistically than those using simplified regular loading. In this study, cyclic triaxial tests using irregular earthquake motions are performed with different earthquake magnitudes, relative densities, and fines contents. Assessment of liquefaction potential in moderate earthquake regions is discussed based on various laboratory test results. Effects of these components on dynamic behavior of soils are discussed as well. From the test results, screening limits and magnitude scaling factors to determine the soil liquefaction resistance strength in seismic design were re-investigated and proposed using normalized maximum stress ratios under real irregular earthquake motions.
 
Ű¿öµå
Assessment of liquefaction potential;Irregular earthquake motions;Liquefaction resistance ratio;Magnitude scaling factors;Screening limits;Triaxial tests;
 
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.20, no.7, 2004³â, pp.127-140
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-2427
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200425720311166)
¾ð¾î : ¿µ¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿