¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ / v.20, no.9, 2004³â, pp.77-89
ÇѰè»óż³°è¹ýÀÇ ±âÃʼ³°è Àû¿ëÀ» À§ÇÑ ºÎºÐ¾ÈÀü°è¼öÀÇ Æò°¡
( Assessment of Partial Safety Factors for Limit States Design of Foundations )
±è¹üÁÖ; Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿ø°ø»ç ¼öÀÚ¿ø¿¬±¸¿ø ´ï¾ÈÀü¿¬±¸¼Ò;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÇѰè»óż³°è¹ýÀº ±¸Á¶ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼­´Â ÀϹÝÈ­µÇ¾î ÀÖÀ¸³ª Áö¹ÝºÐ¾ß¿¡¼­´Â ºñ±³Àû »õ·Î¿î ¼³°è¹ýÀ¸·Î ÃÖ±Ù ¼¼°èÀûÀ¸·Î Áö¹Ý±¸Á¶¹°ÀÇ ¼³°è¿¡µµ º¸´Ù ÇÕ¸®Àû ÀÎ ¼³°è¸¦ À§ÇÏ¿© ÇѰè»óż³°è¹ýÀ» Àû¿ëÇÏ·Á´Â Ãß¼¼¿¡ ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ¹Ì±¹, ij³ª´Ù, À¯·´ÀÇ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÇѰè»óż³°è ½Ã¹æ¼­µéÀ» ¼öÁýÇÏ¿© °¢±¹ÀÇ ½Ã¹æ¼­µé¿¡¼­ Á¦½ÃµÈ ºÎºÐ¾ÈÀü°è¼ö(ÇÏÁß°è¼ö¿Í ÀúÇ×°è¼ö)µéÀ» Á¶»çÇϰí, °£´ÜÇÑ FOSM(first order second moment) ½Å·Úµµ ÇØ¼®À» ÅëÇÏ¿© ¼³°è¿¡ ÀÌ¿ëµÇ´Â ´ëÇ¥ÀûÀÎ ÇÏÁߵ鿡 ´ëÇÑ ÇÏÁß°è¼ö¿Í ±âÃÊ ÁöÁö·Â¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀúÇ×°è¼ö¸¦ »êÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±âÃÊ ¼³°è½Ã ÇÏÁß°è¼ö ¹× ÇÏÁßÁ¶ÇÕÀº »óºÎ ±¸Á¶¹°ÀÇ ¼³°è¿¡ »ç¿ëµÈ Á¶°ÇÀ» ±×´ë·Î »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¼³°èÀÇ È¿À²È­¸¦ À§ÇØ ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. FOSM ÇØ¼®°á°ú, »êÁ¤µÈ ÇÏÁß°è¼öµéÀº ´ëºÎºÐ ½Ã¹æ¼­ÀÇ ÇÏÁß°è¼öµé°ú ºñ½ÁÇÑ ¹üÀ§¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾úÀ¸³ª, ±âÃÊ ÁöÁö·Â¿¡ ´ëÇØ »êÁ¤µÈ ÀúÇ×°è¼ö´Â Áö¹Ý¼³°è¿ä¼Ò¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àü¹ÝÀûÀ¸·Î ³ôÀº º¯µ¿°è¼ö°ªÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ÀüüÀûÀ¸·Î ½Ã¹æ¼­º¸´Ù ³·Àº ¹üÀ§¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. Áö¹ÝÀÇ ÁöÁö·ÂÀº ¸Å¿ì ´Ù¾çÇÑ ºÒÈ®½Ç ¿ä¼ÒµéÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇϸç ÇØ¼®¹æ¹ý¸¶´Ù ³»ÀçµÈ ºÒÈ®½Ç¼ºÀÇ Á¤µµ°¡ ´Ù¸£¹Ç·Î ÁöÁö·Â »êÁ¤¹æ¹ý¸¶´Ù ´Ù¸¥ ÀúÇ×°è¼ö°ªÀÌ Àû¿ëµÇ¾î¾ß Çϸç À̸¦ À§ÇØ ¿ì¼±ÀûÀ¸·Î °¢ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ Æ÷ÇÔµÈ °³°³ÀÇ ºÒÈ®½Ç ¿ä¼Ò¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔ, Àüü ÁöÁö·Â¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºÒÈ®½Ç¼ºÀÇ Á¤·®È­¸¦ À§ÇÑ ³ë·ÂÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù.
While limit states design (LSD) is currently the standard structural design practice, it is relatively new in the geotechnical design. Adoption of LSD far geotechnical design is an international trend. In the present study, various LSD codes from the United States, Canada, and Europe were reviewed. A simple first-order-second-moment (FOSM) reliability analysis was performed to determine theoretically the ranges of load and resistance factor values for representative loads and foundation bearing capacity, respectively. In order for foundation design to be consistent with current structural design practice, it would be desirable to use the same loads, load factors and load combinations. The values of load factor, obtained from the FOSM analysis, were found to be generally consistent with those given in the codes, whereas the values of resistance factor indicated overall lower ranges due to high values of coefficient of variation used in the analysis. Since the degree of uncertainties included in bearing capacity of foundations varies with the methods used to estimate the bearing capacity, different values of resistance factor should be used fur different methods. For the purpose, continuous efforts are needed to be made first to accurately identify and quantify the uncertainties in the methods.
 
Ű¿öµå
Foundations;Limit states design;Load factor;Reliability analysis;Resistance factor;
 
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.20, no.9, 2004³â, pp.77-89
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-2427
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200430710459082)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿