¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ / v.10, no.2, 2010³â, pp.97-104
ºí¶óÀÎµå ³»ÀåÇü âȣ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ¿¡³ÊÁö ¼º´É ¹× °æÁ¦¼º Æò°¡¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( Study on Energy Performance And Economic Evaluation of Windows System with Built-in Type Blinds )
Á¶¿øÈ­;ÀÓ³²±â; µ¿¸í´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇаú;µ¿¸í´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â Àü¿­Çؼ® ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÎ ÇÇÁöº§(PHYSIBEL)À» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ºí¶óÀÎµå ³»ÀåÇü âȣ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ÀÏ»çÂ÷´Ü¼º´É ¹× ´Ü¿­¼º´É¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿¡³ÊÁö ¼º´ÉÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇÇÁöº§ ÇØ¼®½Ã âȣº° ±¸¼º Àç·áÀÇ ¿­ÀûƯ¼º°ú ÇØ¼®Á¶°ÇÀ» °áÁ¤Çϱâ À§Çؼ­ Mock-up½ÃÇèÀ» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ÇÀ» ÅëÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î °øµ¿ÁÖÅà ±âÁØÃþ 1°³ ¼¼´ë(33ÆòÇü)¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¿¬°£¿¡³ÊÁö ¼ÒºñƯ¼º, ¿¬°£Àü¿­·®, ¿¬°£ ³Ã³­¹æ ºñ¿ëÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇè°á°ú, ¿¬°£Àü¿­·®Àº ÀÏ¹Ý Ã¢È£½Ã½ºÅÛ ´ëºñ ºí¶óÀÎµå ³»ÀåÇü âȣ½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡¼­ ºí¶óÀε带 ¿Ã¸° °æ¿ì ³Ã¹æ½Ã 10%, ³­¹æ½Ã 11% Àý°¨ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ºí¶óÀε带 ³»¸° °æ¿ì ³Ã¹æ½Ã 25%, ³­¹æ½Ã 30%Á¤µµ¸¦ Àý°¨ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ºí¶óÀÎµå ³»ÀåÇü âȣ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ³Ã ³­¹æ ºÎÇÏ Àý°¨·®Àº ÀÏ¹Ý Ã¢È£½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡ ºñÇØ ³Ã¹æ½Ã 283.3KWh, ³­¹æ½Ã 76.3KWh ·Î ³Ã ³­¹æ ¿¡³ÊÁö Àý°¨È¿°ú´Â ´ÜÀ§¼¼´ë´ç 359.6KWh Àý°¨½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, À̰ÍÀº ´ÜÀ§¼¼´ë´ç ¿¬°£ ¿¡³ÊÁö¿ø´ÜÀ§(TOE) ¾à 0.078toe, ÀÌ»êȭź¼ÒÅæ($tCO_2$) $0.16tCO_2$À» Àý°¨½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ¾î ¿Â½Ç°¡½º Àú°¨¿¡µµ À¯¸®ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ºí¶óÀÎµå ³»ÀåÇü âȣ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ³Ã ³­¹æºñ¿ë Àý°¨¾×Àº ÀϹÝâȣ½Ã½ºÅÛ°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ¿¬°£ ³Ã¹æºñ¿ë 10¸¸¿ø, ³­¹æºñ¿ë 5¸¸¿øÀ¸·Î ¿¬°£ ³Ã ³­¹æ ºñ¿ëÀ» ¾à 15¸¸¿ø Á¤µµ Àý°¨½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
This study evaluated the energy efficiency of a windows system using built-in blinds, with regard to their insulation performance and their blocking of solar radiation. The study took advantage of the "Physibel Voltra" program as a physical simulation of heat transfer. To simulate the "Physibel Voltra" program, I practiced a mock-up test to determine heating quality and translation condition. I analyzed the propensity to annual energy consumption, the annual quantity of heat transfer, and the annual cooling and heating cost through a computer simulation for one general household in an apartment building. In the test, it was found that compared to a general windows system, a windows system with built-in blinds reduced the annual heat transfer by 10% in cooling states and by 11% in heating states when the blind was up. When the blind was down, the windows system with built-in blinds reduced the annual heat transfer by 25% in cooling states and 30% in heating states. When a windows system with built-in blinds is compared with a general windows system, the quantity of cooling and heating loads is reduced by 283.3kw in cooling states and 76.3kw in heating states. This leads to a reduction in the required cooling and heating energy of 359.6kw per house. It is thus judged that the use of a windows system with built-in blinds is advantageous in terms of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, because the annual TOE (tons of oil equivalent) per house is reduced by 0.078TOE, while $tCO_2$ is reduced by $0.16tCO_2$. In addition, compared with a general windows system, the cost of cooling and heating loads in the system reduces the annual cooling cost by 100,000won, and the annual heating cost by 50,000won. Ultimately, this means that cooling and heating loads are cut by 150,000won per year.
 
Ű¿öµå
ºí¶óÀεå;³»ÀåÇü;âȣ½Ã½ºÅÛ;¿¡³ÊÁö ¼º´É;Blinds;Built-in Type;Windows System;Energy Performance;
 
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸÁö / v.10, no.2, 2010³â, pp.97-104
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1598-2033
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201021452661203)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿