¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ / v.9, no.6, 2009³â, pp.161-168
ÁöÇϿ˺® ¹«ÁöÁÖ °ÅǪÁý °³¹ß ¹× °æÁ¦¼º ºÐ¼®¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( A Study on the Development of a Non-supporting Form for Basement Wall and the Analysis on Its Economical Efficiency )
±èÀ翱;ÀÌ»ó¿ì;¼Õ¿µÁø;±è±¤Èñ; ÃæÁÖ´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇаú;ÃæÁÖ´ëÇб³ »ê¾÷´ëÇпø °ÇÃà°øÇаú;(ÁÖ)ÄܽºÅØ;°æ±â´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇÐ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
°ÇÃà°ø»ç¿¡¼­ ÁöÇϰø»ç´Â ÁÖ°øÁ¤À¸·Î Àüü°ø±â¿Í °ø»çºñ¿¡¼­ Å« ºÎºÐÀ» Â÷ÁöÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ƯÈ÷ µµ½ÉÁöÀÇ °æ¿ì ÇØ¸¶´Ù ±Ô¸ð°¡ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ÇöÀç ÇöÀå¿¡¼­ ½Ã°øÇÏ´Â ÁöÇϿ˺®Àº ¸¹Àº ±â´É ÀηÂÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇϰí, °ø»ç±â°£ Ãø¸é¿¡¼­µµ ºÒ¸®ÇÑ À¯·ÎÆû+¼ÖÁ®½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© °ø»ç°¡ ÁøÇàµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â Åä¸ñ°ø»ç ÇöÀå¿¡¼­ ÀϺΠ»ç¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â ¹«ÁöÁÖ °ÅǪÁýÀ» ±âÃÊ·ÎÇÏ¿© °ÇÃà°ø»ç¿¡ Àû¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ ¹«ÁöÁÖ °ÅǪÁýÀ» °³¹ßÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ °ÅǪÁýÀÇ Å©±â¸¦ °¡Á¤ÇÏ¿© °ÇÃà°ø»ç ÇöÀå¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¸¹ÀÌ »ç¿ëµÇ´Â À¯·ÎÆû+¼ÖÁ®½Ã½ºÅÛ°ú °æÁ¦¼º Ãø¸é¿¡¼­ ºñ±³.ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸ °á°ú, ÇÕ¼º ¹«ÁöÁÖ °ÅǪÁýÀº À¯·ÎÆû+¼ÖÁ®½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡ ºñÇØ °ø»çºñ°¡ ¾à 9%³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ºñÇÕ¼º ¹«ÁöÁÖ °ÅǪÁýÀº ¾à 9%³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸ ÇÕ¼º ¹«ÁöÁÖ °ÅǪÁýÀÇ °æ¿ì ±¸Á¶Ã¼°ø»ç¿¡¼­ ÄÜÅ©¸®Æ®¿Í ö±ÙÀÇ ¹°·®ÀÌ ÇöÀúÈ÷ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿©, ±âÁ¸¿Ëº® ½Ã°ø°¡°Ý º¸´Ù ¾à 35% °æÁ¦Àû ¿ø°¡Àý°¨ È¿°ú¸¦ º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.
In an architectural construction, underground construction is a critical path forming a major part of the total construction period and cost, and particularly in big cities, its size has been increasing every year. A basement wall currently constructed in the field needs a large functional work force, and the construction is under progress by the Euroform and Soldier system, which is disadvantageous in terms of the construction period. Therefore, in this research, non-supporting forms which are applicable to the buildings construction were developed, based on the non-supporting forms partly used in some civil engineering works. In addition, the size of a form was assumed and its economical efficiency was compared to that of the Euroform and Soldier system which is used most in construction fields, and the results were analyzed. The study results showed that the construction cost of composite non-supporting forms was higher than that of the Euroform and Soldier system by about 8%, and the construction cost of non-composite non-supporting forms were lower than that of the Euroform and Soldier system by about 9%. However, in the case of composite non-supporting forms, the amount of concrete and reinforcing rods remarkably decreased in structural construction, so it has the effect of an economical cost reduction compared to the construction cost of existing walls by about 35%
 
Ű¿öµå
ÁöÇϿ˺®;À¯·ÎÆû;¼ÖÁ® ½Ã½ºÅÛ;¹«ÁöÁÖ °ÅǪÁý;°æÁ¦¼º ºÐ¼®;Basement wall;Euro-form;Soldier system;Non-supporting form;Economical analysis;
 
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸÁö / v.9, no.6, 2009³â, pp.161-168
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1598-2033
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200919038644032)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿