|
|
|
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ / v.15, no.6, 1999³â, pp.263-272
|
ÀýÆí¹ý°ú À¯ÇÑÂ÷ºÐ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ »ç¸é¾ÈÁ¤Çؼ® ºñ±³¿¬±¸
( Slope Stability Analysis by Slice Method and Finite Difference Method- A Comparative Study - ) |
| ¹Ú¿¬ÁØ;俵¼ö;À¯±¤È£;¹é¿µ½Ä; ¼ö¿ø´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;¼ö¿ø´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;¼ö¿ø´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;°æÈñ´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| »ç¸é¾ÈÁ¤ ¹®Á¦¿¡ ³Î¸® ÀÌ¿ëµÇ´Â ÀýÆí¹ýÀº »ç¿ëÀÌ °£ÆíÇÏ°í °è»ê½Ã°£ÀÌ Âª´Ù´Â ÀåÁ¡ÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸³ª, °¢ ÀýÆíµé »çÀÌ¿¡ ÀÛ¿ëÇÏ´Â Èû¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °¡Á¤¿¡ µû¶ó ¿©·¯ °¡Áö ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùµÇ¸ç, ±× °á°ú ¶ÇÇÑ ´Ù¸£°Ô ³ª¿À´Â ´ÜÁ¡ÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹æ¹ý°£ÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡ µû¶ó ¸Å¿ì ½ÉÇÏ¿© °øÇÐÀûÀÎ °áÁ¤À» ¾î·Æ°Ô ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ µå¹°Áö ¾Ê´Ù. º» ³í¹®¿¡¼´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹®Á¦¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇØ°á¹æ¾ÈÀÇ Çϳª·Î À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò¹ý ¹× À¯ÇÑÂ÷ºÐ¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ »ç¸éÀÇ ¾ÈÁ¤¼º ÇØ¼® ¹× ¾ÈÀüÀ² °è»ê¹æ¹ýÀ» Á¦½ÃÇϰíÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇÏ¿© À¯ÇÑÂ÷ºÐ¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Áö¹ÝÇØ¼®¿ë ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÎ FLACÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© »ç¸éÀÇ ¾ÈÀüÀ²À» °è»êÇÏ´Â routineÀ» ÀÛ¼ºÇϰí, ChenÀÇ ÇѰèÆòÇüÇØ¿Í ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© °ËÁõÇÏ¿´´Ù. Fredlund ¿Í KrhanÀÌ Á¦½ÃÇÑ ¹®Á¦¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© ±× °á°ú¸¦ ÈçÈ÷ »ç¿ëµÇ´Â ¸î °¡Áö ÀýÆí¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇØ¼®°á°ú¿Í ºñ±³ÇÑ °á°ú ±ÕÁúÇÑ Áö¹ÝÀÇ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ÀýÆí¹ý°ú 0.01 À̳»ÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ¿¬¾à¸éÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ÀýÆí¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÇØ¿Í 5% À̳»ÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ Áö¹ÝÇØ¼®¿ë ÇÁ·Î±×·¥µéÀº º¹ÀâÇÑ Áö¹ÝÁ¶°ÇÀº ¹°·Ð, Áö¹Ýº¸°ÀçÀÇ È¿°úµµ °í·ÁÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¹Ç·Î ¼öÄ¡ÇØ¼®¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÇØ¹ýÀÌ °øÇÐÀûÀÎ °áÁ¤¿¡ ¸¹Àº µµ¿òÀ» ÁÙ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÇ¸ç, °³¹ßµÈ routineÀº ÀýÆí¹ýÀÌ Á¦ÇÑÀûÀ¸·Î¸¸ Àû¿ëµÇ´Â Àý¸®¾Ï¹Ý»ç¸éÀ̳ª Ç³È¾Ï »ç¸éÀÇ ¾ÈÀüÀ² °è»ê¿¡µµ Ȱ¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëµÈ´Ù. |
|
| Slice method is commonly used in solving slope stability problems since it is easy to use and its computation time is rather short. But depending upon the assumptions on the inter-slice forces, different methods are available. Quite often the difference between methods are so big that it is very difficult to make engineering decisions. This paper describes a method to calculate the factor of safety of a slope using FLAC, a finite difference based program. A FISH routine is developed to calculate the factor of safety, and verified by comparing with Chen's limit equilibrium solution. An example problem was selected from Fredlund and Krhan's paper, and results were compared for different soil and water conditions. The difference was less than 0.01 when the soil is homogeneous, and less than 5 % when a weak layer is embedded. Since most geotechnical application programs are capable of considering complicated ground conditions as well as the effect of ground supports, numerical methods are believed to be very useful in making engineering decisions. The developed routine can be applied to the calculation of the factor of safety of jointed rock slopes or weathered rock slopes where the use of slice method is limited. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| Slope stability;Factor of safety;Strength reduction technique;Limit equilibrium method;Finite difference method;Failure surface;Interface element; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.15, no.6, 1999³â, pp.263-272
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-2427
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199911921749917)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|