¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ / v.22, no.4, 2006³â, pp.61-71
UBCSAND¸ðµ¨À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ »ç¸éÀÇ µ¿Àû°Åµ¿Çؼ®
( Numerical Modeling of Sloping Ground under Earthquake Loading Using UBCSAND Model )
¹Ú¼º½Ä;±è¿µ¼ö;±èÈñÁß; ;°æºÏ´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;°è¸í´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ³í¹®¿¡¼­´Â À¯È¿ÀÀ·Â¸ðµ¨À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Æ÷È­µÈ »ç¸éÀÇ µ¿Àû°Åµ¿¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸¸¦ ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼öÄ¡ÇØ¼®¿¡´Â ÀúÀÚ°¡ °³¹ßÇÑ ¿¬¼º À¯È¿ÀÀ·Â¸ðµ¨ÀÎ UBSSAND¸ðµ¨À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÀÌ ¸ðµ¨Àº ÃʱâÀü´ÜÀÀ·ÂÀÌ ¼öÆò¸é¿¡ ÀÛ¿ëÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì¿Í ÀÛ¿ëÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â °æ¿ì¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ¹Ýº¹ Á÷Á¢´Ü¼øÀü´Ü½ÃÇè ÀڷḦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °ËÁõÇÏ¿´´Ù. °ËÁõµÈ ¸ðµ¨Àº ´À½¼ÇÑ Fraser River ¸ð·¡·Î ¼ºÇüµÈ »ç¸éÀ» °¡Áø ¿ø½É¸ðÇü¸ðµ¨ÀÇ µ¿Àû°Åµ¿À» ¿¹ÃøÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¹ÃøµÈ °úÀ×°£±Ø¼ö¾Ð, °¡¼Óµµ ¹× º¯À§¸¦ °èÃøÄ¡¿Í ¼­·Î ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¿¹ÃøÄ¡¿Í °èÃøÄ¡´Â ºñ±³Àû ¼­·Î Àß ÀÏÄ¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àü´ÜÀÀ·ÂµµÀÇ ÀÀ·ÂÀüȯÇüÅ´ ÃʱâÀü´ÜÀÀ·Â°ú ¹Ýº¹Àü´ÜÀÀ·ÂÀÇ Å©±â¿¡ µû¶ó ´Þ¶óÁö¸ç, ÀÌ´Â ÁöÁø½Ã Æ÷È­µÈ »ç¸éÀÇ ¾ÈÁ¤Çؼ®¿¡ ¾ÆÁÖ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» Çϰí ÀÖÀ½À» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Àü´ÜÀÀ·ÂµµÀÇ ÀÀ·ÂÀüȯÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ» °æ¿ì¿¡ »ç¸é±ÙóÀÇ ¸ð·¡´Â ³·Àº À¯È¿ÀÀ·Â ±¸¼Ó¾Ð°ú ±×¿¡ µû¸¥ ÆØÃ¢¼ºÀ¸·Î(ºÎÀÇ °úÀ×°£±Ø¼ö¾Ð¹ß»ý) À¯È¿ÀÀ·ÂÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿©, µ¿ÀûÇÏÁß ÇÏÀÇ »ç¸éÀÇ º¯À§¸¦ ÀúÁöÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í °°Àº À¯È¿ÀÀ·Â¸ðµ¨Àº ¾×»óÈ­¸¦ °í·ÁÇÑ Áö¹Ý±¸Á¶¹°ÀÇ ³»ÁøÇؼ®¿¡ À¯¿ëÇÏ°Ô »ç¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.
A numerical procedure is presented fur evaluating seismic liquefaction on sloping ground sites. The procedure uses a fully coupled dynamic effective stress analysis with a plastic constitutive model called UBCSAND. The model was first calibrated against laboratory element behavior. This involved cyclic simple shear tests performed on loose sand with and without initial static shear stress. The numerical procedure is then verified by predicting a centrifuge test with a slope performed on loose Fraser River sand. The predicted excess pore pressures, accelerations and displacements are compared with the measurements. The results are shown to be in good agreement. The shear stress reversal patterns depend on static and cyclic shear stress levels and are shown to play a key role in evaluating liquefaction response in sloping ground sites. The sand near the slope has low effective confining stress and dilates more. When no stress reversals occur, the sand behaves in a stiffer manner that curtails the accumulated downslope displacements. The numerical procedure using UBCSAND can serve as a guide for design of new soil structures or retrofit of existing ones.
 
Ű¿öµå
Centrifuge test;Liquefaction;Slope;Simple shear;Stress reversal;UBCSAND;
 
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.22, no.4, 2006³â, pp.61-71
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-2427
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200622219588760)
¾ð¾î : ¿µ¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿