|
|
|
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ / v.22, no.5, 2006³â, pp.83-91
|
°¿ì·Î ÀÎÇÑ Ã¶µµ ¿¬º¯»ç¸éÀÇ È°µ¿ºÐ¼® : ½Ç³»¸ðÇü½ÇÇè
( Analysis on the Rainfall Driven Slope Failure Adjacent to a Railway : Flume Tests ) |
| »ç°ø¸í;±è¹Î¼®;±è¼ö»ï;ÀÌÀοë; Çѱ¹Ã¶µµ±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø ±ËµµÅä¸ñ¿¬±¸º»ºÎ;(ÁÖ)µ¿Àϱâ¼ú°ø»ç öµµºÎ;ÇѾç´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñȯ°æ°øÇаú;(ÁÖ)µ¿Àϱâ¼ú°ø»ç öµµºÎ;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| ÃÖ±Ù Áö±¸¿Â³ÈÇö»óÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ±¹Áö¼º È£¿ì´Â öµµ ¿¬º¯»ç¸é Ȱµ¿ ¹× Ȱµ¿ Åäü·Î ÀÎÇÑ ¼±·Î¸Å¸ô ±×¸®°í ¼±·ÎÀ¯½Ç µîÀÇ ºÒ¾ÈÁ¤¼ºÀ» ÃÊ·¡ÇÏ´Â ¿äÀÎÀ¸·Î ´ëµÎµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. °¿ì·Î ÀÎÇÑ »ç¸éÀÇ °Åµ¿¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇöÀåÁ¶»ç °á°ú ÅäÃþÀÇ µÎ²² ¹× »ç¸éÀÇ ÇüÅÂÀû Ư¼º µî¿¡ µû¶ó ¼·Î ´Ù¸¥ Ȱµ¿Æ¯¼ºÀÌ °üÃøµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í °°Àº Ȱµ¿Æ¯¼ºÀ» õÃþ Ȱµ¿Å¸ÀÔ, Áß°£Ãþ Ȱµ¿Å¸ÀÔ, ¿ì°îºÎ Ȱµ¿Å¸ÀÔ, ¾Ï¹Ý °æ°èºÎ Ȱµ¿Å¸ÀÔ 4°¡Áö·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °üÃø°ú °ü·ÃÇÏ¿© °¢ ŸÀÔÀÇ È°µ¿¸ÞÄ¿´ÏÁòÀ» ±Ô¸íÇÏ°í °¿ì½Ã »ç¸éÀÇ °Åµ¿Æ¯¼ºÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇϰíÀÚ ½Ç³»¸ðÇü½ÇÇèÀ» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½Ç³»¸ðÇü½ÇÇèÀº ¹Ì¸³ºÐÇÔ·®, ÃʱâÇÔ¼öºñ, °æ»ç°¢, ´ÙÁü¿¡³ÊÁö¸¦ °íÁ¤ º¯¼ö·Î ÃëÇϰí ÅäÇǰí, °¿ì°µµ, »ç¸éÇ¥¸éÀÇ ÇüŸ¦ º¯È½ÃŰ´Â Á¶°ÇÀ¸·Î ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. ½Ç³»¸ðÇü½ÇÇèÀÇ °á°ú õÃþ Ȱµ¿Àº ÁַΠǥÃþ¿¡¼ ¹ß»ýÇϸç ħ½Ä¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ È°µ¿ÀÓÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Ãʱâ ħ½ÄÀÌ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ´Ù¸¥ Ȱµ¿Å¸ÀÔ¿¡ ºñÇØ¼ ´Ê°Ô ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´À¸³ª ħ½ÄÀÇ ÁøÇàÀº »¡¶ú´Ù. ¿ì°îºÎ Ȱµ¿Å¸ÀÔÀº ¿ì°îºÎ·Î Áý¼öµÈ ºø¹°·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© ħ½Ä Á¤µµ°¡ ´õ ½ÉÇÏ°Ô ÁøÇàµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç »ç¸é³» À§Ä¡ÇÏ´Â Àü¼®ÀÌ µå·¯³¯ Á¤µµ¿´´Ù. Àü¼®Ãþ±îÁö ħ½ÄÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÑÈÄ Àü¼®ÀÇ Á¸Àç·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© Ãß°¡ÀûÀΠħ½ÄÀÌ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ±× ÀÌÀüº¸´Ù ´À¸®°Ô ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¾Ï¹Ý °æ°èºÎ Ȱµ¿Å¸ÀÔÀÇ °æ¿ì º» ½ÇÇè¿¡¼ °¡Àå »¡¸® Ãʱâ Ȱµ¿ ¹ß»ýÀÌ °üÃøµÇ¾ú´Ù. °¢ Ȱµ¿Å¸ÀÔ¿¡¼ °øÅëÀûÀ¸·Î °üÃøµÈ »çÇ×Àº »ç¸éÀÇ Çϴܺο¡¼ Ãʱ⠺¯ÇüÀÌ °üÃøµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °üÃøÀº »ç¸é³» ħÅõ¼öÀÇ »ç¸é¹æÇâÀÇ È帧À» ÀǹÌÇÑ´Ù. |
|
| Recently, the intensive rainstorm possibly induced by global warming plays a key role on the instability of railway adjacent slopes. The instability of slopes results as covering and loss of railway lines induced by slided soil mass. According to the site investigation on the failed slopes triggered by rainfall, low types of slope failure were observed: shallow, intermediate, gully erosion, and soil-rock interface failures. The observation reveals the different characteristics of slope failure depending on the thickness of soil layer, morphological features of slope, etc. Based upon the observations, flume tests were conducted to analyze the sliding mechanism of each failure. The variables of flume test are soil layer thickness, rainfall intensity, and morphology of slope under the constant condition of the percentage of fine, initial soil moisture content, slope angle and compaction energy. Test results show that shallow failure was mostly observed from the surface of the slope and caused by the soil erosion; in addition, compared to the other types of failure, the occurrence of initial erosion is late, however, the development of erosion is fast. In gully erosion failure, the collected water from the water catchment area helps erosion of the upper soil layer and transfer of residual corestone, which impedes the erosion process once the upper soil layers are eroded and corestone are exposed. The soil-rock interface failure shows the most fast initial erosion process among the failure types. Interestingly, the common feature observed from the different types of failure was the occurrence of the initial deformation near the toe of slopes which implies the existence of surbsurface flow along the downslope direction. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| Gully flow;Infiltration;Rainfall-driven slope failure;Run off flow;Slope morphology; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.22, no.5, 2006³â, pp.83-91
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-2427
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200626813151377)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|