¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ / v.9, no.5, 2009³â, pp.103-110
¹Ì±¹ÀÇ °ø°ø°ø»ç ¼³°èº¯°æÁ¶Ç× ÇØ¼®µ¿Çâ ¿¬±¸
( A Study on the Interpretation for Change Order Clause of USA Government Contract )
Á¶¿µÁØ; ÁߺδëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
°Ç¼³»ç¾÷°è¾àÀº ¸Å¿ì ´Ù¾çÇÑ °è¾àÀ¸·Î ±¸¼ºµÇ¾î ÀÖ´Ù. ±×¸®°í ÀÌ´Â ÀÏÀÇ ¿Ï¼ºÀ» ÇÊ¿ä·Î ÇÏ´Â µµ±Þ°è¾àÀÇ ÀÏÁ¾ÀÌ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ´ç»çÀÚµéÀº °è¾àÀÇ ÀÌÇà°úÁ¤Áß¿¡ Ç×»ó ¸¹Àº ºÐÀï¿¡ ºÀÂøÇÏ°Ô µÈ´Ù. ½ÇÁ¦·Î ¹ßÁÖÀÚÀÇ Áö½Ã¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¼³°èº¯°æÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ¸¹Àº ºÐÀïÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ºÐÀïÀ» ÇØ°áÇϱâ À§Çؼ­´Â °è¾àÀÇ ÇØ¼®ÀÌ ¼ö¹ÝµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÏÁö¸¸, ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó¿¡¼­´Â Á¾±¹ÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐÀïÀ» ÇØ°áÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ´Â ºÐÀïÇØ°áÀýÂ÷°¡ ÁßÀç¿Í ¼Ò¼Û¿¡ ±¹ÇѵǾî ÀÖÀ¸¹Ç·Î °è¾à´ç»çÀÚµéÀÌ ºñÈ¿À²¼ºÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ À̸¦ ²¨¸®°Ô µÇ´Â ½ÇÁ¤ÀÌ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó¿¡¼­´Â °è¾àÀÇ ÇØ¼®À» ã¾Æº¸±â´Â ½±Áö ¾ÊÀº ¹Ý¸é, ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ °æ¿ì ¹ßÁÖÀÚº°·Î ºÐÀïÇØ°áÀýÂ÷¸¦ µÒÀ¸·Î½á ´Ù¾çÇÑ °è¾àÀÇ ÇØ¼®À¯ÇüÀ» ã¾Æº¼ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â °ú¾÷ÀÇ ¹üÀ§¸¦ ÃʰúÇÏ´Â º¯°æ, ¼ö·®ÀÇ º¯°æ, ÀÌÇà±â°£ÀÇ º¯°æ, ÀÌÇà¹æ¹ý°ú ŵµÀÇ º¯°æ, Á¤ºÎÁ¦°ø¹°Ç°À̳ª ÀεµÀå¼ÒÀÇ º¯°æ, ½Ã°øÀÚÀÇ º¯°æÀýÂ÷ ¼ö¿ë, °¨¾×Á¶Á¤¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »çÇ׿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇØ¼®µ¿ÇâÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù.
A construction project consists of a variety of contracts for the completion of work. The large number of contracts involved in a single project increases the likelihood that disputes will arise between the parties involved regarding the terms of service. Actually, there are many disputes that are caused by a change 0 order. While such disputes should be settled by interpreting the terms stipulated in the agreement entered between the two parties, the process of dispute settlement is often restricted to arbitration and lawsuit, and as a result the parties tend to avoid it due to its inefficiency. For this reason, in Korea it is hard to find cases of interpreting terms of service, while in the U.S. it is easy to find diverse cases of interpreting terms of service, since there is a process of dispute settlement by each stage by the party who has placed an order. Therefore, this study presents analysis of case studies of contract changes, looking specifically at changes in the scope of the work, changes in quantity, changes in the period of implementation, changes in the method of implementation or attitude, changes in items provided by the government or the delivery place, and the acceptance of such change procedure by a contractor, and the adjustment of a reduction.
 
Ű¿öµå
¼³°èº¯°æ;°è¾àÇØ¼®;ÁßÀç;¼Ò¼Û;Change Order;Interpretation of Contract;Arbitration;Lawsuit;
 
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸÁö / v.9, no.5, 2009³â, pp.103-110
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1598-2033
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200935736657931)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿