¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ / v.22, no.9, 2006³â, pp.45-59
Implicit ¼öÄ¡ÀûºÐ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Á¶¸³Åä¿¡ °üÇÑ ±¸¼º¹æÁ¤½ÄÀÇ ¼öÇà
( Implicit Numerical Integration of Two-surface Plasticity Model for Coarse-grained Soils )
ÃÖâȣ; ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ź¼Ò¼º ±¸¼º¹æÁ¤½ÄÀº ÁÖ·Î ¹ÌºÐ¹æÀû½Ä(rate equation)À¸·Î ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ® Àֱ⠶§¹®¿¡ À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò¹ý µîÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Áö¹Ý±¸Á¶¹° ÇØ¼®½Ã ¹ÌºÐ¹æÁ¤½Äµé¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼öÄ¡ÀûºÐÀ» ¼öÇàÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. ±¸Á¶¹°ÀÇ °Åµ¿À» ÇØ¼®Çҽà ¹ÌºÐ¹æÁ¤½ÄµéÀ» À§ÇÑ ÀûºÐ¹æ¹ýÀº ÇØ¼®°á°úÀÇ Á¤È®¼º°ú À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò¹ý ¸ðµ¨¸µÀÇ ¾ÈÀü¼º¿¡ Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í ÀÖ´Ù. º» ³í¹®¿¡¼­´Â ÃÖ±Ù¿¡ °³¹ßµÇ¾î »ç¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â Èë¿¡ °üÇÑ ±¸¼º¸ðµ¨ÀÎ "Two-surface soil plasticity model (Manzari and Dafalias 1997)"À» Implicit return-mapping ¼öÄ¡ÀûºÐ¹æ¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ½ÇÇàÇÏ´Â °úÁ¤À» Á¦½ÃÇÑ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ »ç¿ëµÈ ¼öÄ¡ÀûºÐ¹æ¹ýÀº Closest-Point-Projection Method(CPPM) ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ź¼º ¿¹ÃøÀÚ-¼Ò¼º ±³Á¤ÀÚ(elastic predictor-plastic corrector) °³³äÀ» Implicit Backward Euler¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ü°èÈ­ ½ÃŲ ¾Ë°í¸®µëÀÌ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ ¼öÇàÇÑ "Two-surface soil plasticity model"Àº Á¶¸³ÅäÀÇ ºñ¼±Çü°Åµ¿À» ÇØ¼®Çϸç, Bounding surface °³³ä ¹× ºñ¼±Çü µî¹æ°æÈ­¿Í À̵¿°æÈ­¹ýÄ¢À» »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â ¸ðµ¨ÀÌ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â CPPM ¹æ¹ýÀÌ Á¤È®ÇÏ°í ¾ÈÁ¤µÇ¸ç À¯¿ëÇÑ ¼öÄ¡ÀûºÐÀ» ¼öÇàÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¾Ë°í¸®µëÀ̶ó´Â °ÍÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÑ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, CPPM ¾Ë°í¸®µëÀº ±¸¼º¹æÁ¤½ÄÀÇ ÇØ¸¦ ¹Ýº¹ÀûÀ¸·Î ÇØ¼®ÇÏ´Â µ¿¾È "Consistent tangent operator $d{sigma}/d{varepsilon}$"¸¦ Á¦°øÇϹǷÎ, ºñ¼±Çü À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò ÇØ¼®ÀÌ 2Â÷(quadratic convergence rate)ÀÇ ¼ö·Å Á¶°ÇÀ» ¸¸Á·Çϴµ¥ ±â¿©ÇÑ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» º¸¿©ÁØ´Ù.
The successful performance of any numerical geotechnical simulation depends on the accuracy and efficiency of the numerical implementation of constitutive model used to simulate the stress-strain (constitutive) response of the soil. The corner stone of the numerical implementation of constitutive models is the numerical integration of the incremental form of soil-plasticity constitutive equations over a discrete sequence of time steps. In this paper a well known two-surface soil plasticity model is implemented using a generalized implicit return mapping algorithm to arbitrary convex yield surfaces referred to as the Closest-Point-Projection method (CPPM). The two-surface model describes the nonlinear behavior of coarse-grained materials by incorporating a bounding surface concept together with isotropic and kinematic hardening as well as fabric formulation to account for the effect of fabric formation on the unloading response. In the course of investigating the performance of the CPPM integration method, it is proven that the algorithm is an accurate, robust, and efficient integration technique useful in finite element contexts. It is also shown that the algorithm produces a consistent tangent operator $frac{dsigma}{dvarepsilon}$ during the iterative process with quadratic convergence rate of the global iteration process.
 
Ű¿öµå
Closest-Point-Projection method;Constitutive model;Implicit integration;Return mapping;coarse-grained soil;
 
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.22, no.9, 2006³â, pp.45-59
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-2427
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200634515067470)
¾ð¾î : ¿µ¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿