¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ / v.9, no.4, 2009³â, pp.111-117
ÁöÇϿ˺® ¹«ÁöÁÖ °ÅǪÁý »ç·ÊÀÇ °æÁ¦¼º ºÐ¼®¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( A study on the economical analysis of non-supporting form in basement wall cases )
±èÀ翱;±è±¤Èñ;ÀÌ»ó¿ì;¼Õ¿µÁø; ÃæÁÖ´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇаú;°æ±â´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇÐ;ÃæÁÖ´ëÇб³ »ê¾÷´ëÇпø °ÇÃà°øÇаú;(ÁÖ)ÄܽºÅØ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
°ÇÃà°ø»ç¿¡¼­ ÁöÇϰø»ç´Â Àüü ÁÖ °øÁ¤À¸·Î Àüü°ø±â¿Í °ø»çºñ¿¡¼­ Å« ºÎºÐÀ» Â÷ÁöÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ƯÈ÷ µµ½ÉÁöÀÇ °æ¿ì ÇØ¸¶´Ù ±Ô¸ð°¡ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ÇöÀç ÇöÀå¿¡¼­ ½Ã°øÇÏ´Â ÁöÇϿ˺®Àº ¸¹Àº ±â´É ÀηÂÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇϰí, °ø»ç±â°£ Ãø¸é¿¡¼­µµ ºÒ¸®ÇÑ À¯·ÎÆû+¼ÖÁ®½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© °ø»ç°¡ ÁøÇàµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. À̸¦ º¸¿ÏÇϱâÀ§ÇØ ½Å¼ÒÀç °ÅǪÁý°ú ½Å°ø¹ýÀÌ °³¹ßµÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, °ø»ç±â°£ ´ÜÃà°ú ¿ø°¡ Àý°¨ÀÌ ¿ä±¸µÇ°í ÀÖ´Â ½ÇÁ¤ÀÌ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â °ÇÃà°ø»ç ÇöÀå¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¸¹ÀÌ »ç¿ëµÇ´Â À¯·ÎÆû+¼ÖÁ®½Ã½ºÅÛ°ú Åä¸ñ°ø»ç ÇöÀå¿¡¼­ »ç¿ëµÈ ¹«ÁöÁÖ ÁöÇϿ˺® °ÅǪÁý °ø¹ýÀ» °æÁ¦¼º Ãø¸é¿¡¼­ ºñ±³ÇØ º¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸ °á°ú, À¯·ÎÆû+¼ÖÁ®½Ã½ºÅÛÀÌ Àç·áºñ Ãø¸é¿¡¼­´Â À¯¸®Çϳª, ³ë¹«ºñ Ãø¸é¿¡¼­´Â ºÒ¸®ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸ ¹«ÁöÁÖ °ÅǪÁýÀÇ ÇöÀå Àû¿ë Ȱ¼ºÈ­¸¦ À§Çؼ­´Â Àç·áºñÀÇ Àý°¨À» À§ÇÑ Ãß°¡ÀûÀÎ ¿¬±¸°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
Considering the entire critical path, underground works in construction projects occupy a large part of the total construction period, as well as a large part of the construction costs. Particularly in the downtown area, the scale of underground work has been increasing every year. Currently, underground retaining walls, which are built at construction sites, require many skilled workers, and the works are being undertaken by means of the Euroform+Soldier system, which is quite disadvantageous in terms of the construction period. In order to complement this, forms made of new materials and new construction methods have been developed. Now more than eyer, the shortening of construction periods and the reduction of construction costs is required. Considering this, in this study, the researcher has tried to compare the Euroform+Soldier system, which has been the system most frequently used on construction sites, to the non-supporting form system, which has been used on the sites of civil engineering work. The results of the research revealed that although the Euroform+Soldier system was advantageous from the perspective of material costs, it was disadvantageous in terms of labor costs. It is thought that an additional study on a method for reducing the material costs is required, so as to revitalize the application of non-supporting forms to the construction site.
 
Ű¿öµå
À¯·ÎÆû;¼ÖÁ® ½Ã½ºÅÛ;¹«ÁöÁÖ °ÅǪÁý;°æÁ¦¼º ºÐ¼®;Euro-form;Soldier system;Non-supporting form;Economical analysis;
 
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸÁö / v.9, no.4, 2009³â, pp.111-117
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1598-2033
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200931559903476)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿