¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ / v.24, no.11, 2008³â, pp.111-120
Àΰø¿¬¾à¸éÀ» µû¸¥ À̾ÏÀÇ °­µµÀ̹漺¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( Strength Anisotropy through Artificial Weak Plane of Mudstone )
ÀÌ¿µÈÖ;Á¤°­º¹; ¿µ³²´ëÇб³ °Ç¼³È¯°æ°øÇкÎ;(ÁÖ)ºÎ°è±â¼ú´Ü;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
Æ÷Ç×Áö¿ª ÀÏ¿ø¿¡ ºÐÆ÷ÇÏ´Â À̾ÏÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¾Ï¼®ÀÇ ÆÄ±«°­µµ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ À¯µµÀ̹漺À» ºÐ¼®Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ÀΰøÀý¸®¸éÀ» °®´Â À̹漺 ¾Ï¼®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÏÃà ¹× »ïÃà¾ÐÃà½ÃÇèÀ» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÃÇè°á°ú, ÀÏÃà¾ÐÃà°­µµ¿Í »ïÃà¾ÐÃà°­µµÀÇ ÃÖ¼ÒÄ¡´Â ÀΰøÀý¸®¸éÀÇ °¢µµ ${eta}=30^{circ}$¿¡¼­ ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, À̹漺 À¯ÇüÀº ¾î±úÇüÅÂ(shoulder type)¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ÀÏÃà¾ÐÃà½ÃÇè¿¡¼­ÀÇ À̹æÀ²À» »êÁ¤ÇÑ °á°ú, $R_c=9.0$À¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³ª ¸Å¿ì ³ôÀº À̹漺¿¡ ¼ÓÇÑ ¹Ý¸é, »ïÃà¾ÐÃà½ÃÇè¿¡¼­ À̹æÀ²Àº $1.29{sim}1.98$ Á¤µµÀÇ ³·Àº À̹漺À¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Ramamurthy(1985) ÆÄ±«±ÔÁؽĿ¡ n Áö¼ö¸¦ µµÀÔÇÏ¿© ÀÏÃà¾ÐÃà½ÃÇè°á°ú¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú ${eta}=0^{circ}{sim}30^{circ}$¿¡¼­´Â n=1ÀÎ °î¼±°ú ${eta}=30^{circ}{sim}90^{circ}$¿¡¼­´Â n=3ÀÎ °î¼±ÀÌ °¡Àå ÀûÀýÇÑ °ªÀ» ¿¹ÃøÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ »ïÃà¾ÐÃà½ÃÇè°á°ú¸¦ Ramamurthy ÆÄ±«±ÔÁؽÄÀ» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®Çϱâ À§ÇØ ¸Å°³º¯¼ö »êÁ¤¿¡ °üÇÑ Ramamurthy Á¦¾È½Ä¿¡ ÀÏÃà¾ÐÃà°­µµ¿¡¼­ÀÇ À̹æÀ²À» µµÀÔÇÏ¿© Á¦¾È½ÄÀ» ÀϺΠ¼öÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¸Å°³º¯¼ö¸¦ Àç»êÁ¤Çϰí Ramamurthy ÆÄ±«±ÔÁؽĿ¡ Àû¿ëÇÑ °á°ú Àü¹ÝÀûÀ¸·Î ½ÇÇèÄ¡¿Í Àß ÀÏÄ¡µÇ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, Jaeger(1960), McLamore & Gray(1967) ¹× Hoek & Brown(1980)ÀÇ ÆÄ±«±ÔÁØÀ» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© À̾ÏÀÇ ÆÄ±«°­µµ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ À̹漺À» »ìÆìº¸¾Ò´Ù.
The characteristic of induced anisotropy is investigated in this study for the Pohang mudstone involving the cut plane discontinuity. The uniaxial and triaxial compression tests are performed for anisotropic rocks with artificial joint to look into anisotropic strength characteristics. Both the uniaxial compressive strength and triaxial compressive strength show the lowest value at the angle of cut plane, ${eta}=30^{circ}$ and the shoulder type of anisotropy is obtained. Anisotropy ratio (Rc) in uniaxial compression measures 9.0, whereas Rc=1.29-1.98 in triaxial compression is appeared. A series of analyses are made with the test results to derive the suitable parameter values when it is applied to the Ramamurthy (1985) failure criterion. The result of uniaxial compression test is analyzed by introducing the n-index into Ramamurthy failure criterion. The result shows that, n=l is suitable for ${eta}=0^{circ}{sim}30^{circ}$ and n=3 is suitable for ${eta}=30^{circ}{sim}90^{circ}$. To analyze the result of triaxial compression test by Ramamurthy failure criterion, anisotropy ratio in uniaxial compression test is added to Ramamurthy's equation and material constants are estimated by modified Ramamurthy's equation. When these values are applied back to Ramamurthy failure criterion, the predicted values are well fitted to the test results. And strength anisotropy for failure criteria of Jaeger (1960), McLamore & Gray (1967) and Hoek & Brown (1980) are also investigated.
 
Ű¿öµå
Anisotropic failure criteria;Induced anisotropy;Mudstone;Triaxial compression test;
 
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.24, no.11, 2008³â, pp.111-120
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-2427
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200806135608627)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿