¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ / v.10, no.1, 2010³â, pp.221-228
°Ç¼³ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ® ¼öÁÖ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ÃÀåÀÇ Æò°¡
( Assessment of Equity Market Responses on the Construction Project Awards )
ÃÖÁ¾¼ö;Ç㼺ÅÂ;ÀÌÈñ¹Î; µ¿±¹´ëÇб³, °ÇÃà°øÇаú;µ¿±¹´ëÇб³, °ÇÃà°øÇаú;µ¿±¹´ëÇб³, °ÇÃà°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
°Ç¼³»çÀÇ ¼º°ú´Â °³º°ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®ÀÇ ¼º°ú¿¡ µû¶ó ´Ù¸£°Ô ³ªÅ¸³¯ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®ÀÇ ¼öÁÖ´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Àǹ̿¡¼­ Áß¿äÇÑ Àǹ̸¦ °¡Áö°Ô µÈ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ÇöÀç±îÁö ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ® ¼öÁÖ¿Í °ü·ÃÇÑ ¼º°úÆò°¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸´Â °ÅÀÇ Àü¹«ÇÑ ½ÇÁ¤ÀÌ´Ù. º» »ç°ÇºÐ¼® ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ® ¼öÁÖ ³¯ÀÚ¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ±¸°£À» ¼³Á¤ÇÏ¿© °Ç¼³ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ® ¼öÁÖ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¹ÝÀÀÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃÑ 252°³ÀÇ ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®¸¦ ¾öÁ¤ÇÑ ¼±º°±âÁØ¿¡ ÀǰмöÁýÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®À» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ºÐ¼®¿¡´Â ´©Àû¼öÀÍ·ü »êÁ¤¹æ¹ýÀ» äÅÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼®°á°ú¿¡ ÀÇÇϸé Àüü »ùÇÿ¡ ´ëÇÑ ´©Àû ¼öÀÍ·üÀº ¾ç(+)À¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Îµµ À¯ÀÇÇÑ ¼öÁØÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. ÇÑÆí, ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ® ¼öÁÖ±Ô¸ð¿Í ¼öÀÍ·ü ¼öÁØÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è ºÐ¼®¿¡¼­´Â ¾î¶°ÇÑ »ó°ü¼ºµµ ¹ß°ßµÇÁö ¾ÊÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÀÌ ¿Ü¿¡ ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®¸¦ Ư¼º¿¡ µû¶ó ´Ù¾çÇÑ ±×·ìÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© ´©Àû¼öÀÍ·ü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºñ±³ºÐ¼® °á°ú¸¦ Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ³í¹®¿¡¼­´Â À§¿Í °°Àº °á°ú ¿Ü¿¡ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ºÐ¼®°á°ú°¡ ÀǹÌÇÏ´Â ½Ã»çÁ¡¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ³íÀÇÇÏ¿´´Ù.
A construction firm's performance is largely attributable to performance in individual projects. In this regard, the awarding of an individual project has significant implications. However, project awards have received limited attention in the construction sector from amarket assessment perspective. This event study focuses on an analysis of market responses at the time of project awarding. A total of 252 samples wereselected through a rigorous sample screening processes. Performance was measured as cumulative abnormal return, which is traditionally adopted in event analysis. Research results indicated that the overall return is positive, and that the level isstatistically significant. Equity holders realized a higher return for projects awarded from the foreign countries compared to domestic projects. No relationship was observed between project size and the level of return. Other research findings and implications were discussed in detail from a management perspective.
 
Ű¿öµå
ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ® ¼öÁÖ;´©Àû¼öÀÍ;Áֽİ¡°Ý;Project Awards;Cumulative Abnormal Return;Stock Price;
 
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸÁö / v.10, no.1, 2010³â, pp.221-228
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1598-2033
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201026039609541)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿