¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ / v.23, no.8, 2007³â, pp.17-33
´Ù¿îȦ ±â¹ý¿¡¼­ ½Å·Ú¼º ÀÖ´Â µµ´Þ½Ã°£ Á¤º¸ »êÃâ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °íÂû
( A Study of Obtaining Reliable Travel Time Information in Downhole Seismic Method )
¹æÀº¼®;À̼¼Çö;±èÁ¾ÅÂ;±èµ¿¼ö; Çѱ¹ÁöÁúÀÚ¿ø¿¬±¸¿ø Áö¹Ý¾ÈÀü¿¬±¸ºÎ;Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼ú¿ø °Ç¼³ ¹× ȯ°æ°øÇаú;Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼ú¿ø °Ç¼³ ¹× ȯ°æ°øÇаú;Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼ú¿ø °Ç¼³ ¹× ȯ°æ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
Áö¹ÝÀÇ Àü´ÜÆÄ ¼Óµµ Áֻ󵵸¦ µµÃâÇϴµ¥ ÀÖ¾î ´Ù¿îȦ ±â¹ýÀº ÇϳªÀÇ ½ÃÃß°øÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ°í °£´ÜÇÑ ÁöÇ¥¸é °¡Áø¿øÀ» »ç¿ëÇϹǷΠ¸Å¿ì °æÁ¦ÀûÀÌ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ½ÇÇèÀ» ÅëÇØ ȹµæÇÑ ½ÅÈ£¿¡¼­ Àü´ÜÆÄ ¼ººÐÀÇ µµ´Þ½Ã°£ Á¤º¸¸¦ Á¤È®È÷ µµÃâÇÏÁö ¸øÇÒ °æ¿ì ÃÖÁ¾ °á°úÀÇ ½Å·Ú¼ºÀÌ ¶³¾îÁö°Ô µÈ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ´Ù¿îȦ ±â¹ý¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ÃÖÁ¾ °á°úÀÇ ½Å·Ú¼ºÀ» ³ôÀ̱â À§ÇØ µµ´Þ ½Ã°£ Á¤º¸ÀÇ °áÁ¤ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °íÂûÀº ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù. º» ³í¹®¿¡¼­´Â ÃÑ 6°¡Áö ¹æ¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ´Ù¿îȦ ½ÃÇèÀ» ÅëÇØ ȹµæÇÑ ½ÅÈ£¿¡¼­ µµ´Þ½Ã°£ Á¤º¸¸¦ ȹµæ, ºñ±³ÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç °¢ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ È¿À²ÀûÀÎ ºñ±³ ¹× °ËÁõÀ» À§ÇÏ¿© À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò ÇØ¼® ¹× ½Ç³» ¸ðÇü ÅäÁ¶ ½ÃÇèÀ» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò ÇØ¼®À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ °ËÁõ¿¡¼­´Â ¸ðµ¨ÀÇ ÀÔ·ÂÄ¡¿Í, ½Ç³» ¸ðÇü ÅäÁ¶¿¡¼­´Â º¥´õ ¿¤¸®¸ÕÆ® ½ÃÇè °á°ú¿ÍÀÇ ºñ±³¸¦ ÅëÇØ °¢ ¹æ¹ýÀÇ ¿ÀÂ÷Á¤µµ¸¦ ºñ±³ÇØ º¸¾Ò´Ù. Ãʵ¿ ÃßÁ¤ ¹æ¹ýÀÇ °á°ú´Â ´Ù¸¥ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ºñÇØ ¿ÀÂ÷Á¤µµ°¡ ¸Å¿ì ÄÇ´Ù. ´Ù¸¥ ¹æ¹ýµé ¶ÇÇÑ È¹µæ ÆÄÇüÀÇ Æ¯¼º¿¡ µû¶ó ¿ÀÂ÷ Á¤µµ°¡ ´Þ¶úÀ¸¸ç Á¤È®ÇÑ °ªÀ» Á¦°øÇÏÁö ¸øÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ±× Áß¿¡¼­ »óÈ£»ó°ü¹ýÀÌ Àû¿ë¼ºÀÌ °¡Àå ¶Ù¾î³­ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç ÇöÀå ½ÃÇè µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Ãß°¡ÀûÀÎ °ËÅ並 ÅëÇØ È®ÀÎÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
Downhole seismic method is widely used for obtaining shear wave velocity profile of a site because it is simple and economical. Determining accurate travel time of shear wave is very important to obtain reliable result in downhole seismic method. In this paper, comparison study of various travel time determination methods was performed. Numerical study and model chamber test were performed for effective comparison study. Signal traces were acquired by performing downhole test at each numerical simulation and soil box test. Travel time data for each signal traces were determined by using six different methods and Vs profiles were evaluated. Comparing travel time data and Vs profiles with the reference value, the first arrival picking method proved to be ambiguous and unreliable. Other methods also did not always provide accurate results and the magnitude of error was dependent on the signal to noise ratio. Cross-correlation method proved to be the most adequate method for the field application and it was verified additionally with field data.
 
Ű¿öµå
Chamber test;Downhole seismic method;HWAW;Numerical analysis;Travel time;
 
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.23, no.8, 2007³â, pp.17-33
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-2427
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200734516348467)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿