¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ / v.18, no.6, 2002³â, pp.33-42
Áö¹ÝÀÀ·ÂÀÇ ºñµî¹æ¼º¿¡ µû¸¥ ÅͳÎÃøº®ÀÇ Ãʱâź¼ºº¯À§ Ư¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼öÄ¡ÇØ¼®Àû ¿¬±¸
( Numerical Analysis of the Effects of Stress Anisotropy and Tunnel Excavation Shape on Initial Elastic-wall Displacement )
±è»óȯ;Á¤ÇõÀÏ; È£¼­´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°øÇÐÀü°ø;BAU ÄÁ¼³ÅºÆ® Áö¹Ý/ÅͳκÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
Áö¹Ý ±¼Âø½Ã Áö¹ÝÀÇ º¯À§Æ¯¼º°ú Áöº¸ÀçÀÇ ¼³Ä¡½Ã±â¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áß¿äÇÑ Á¤º¸¸¦ Á¦°øÇÏ´Â Áö¹Ý¹ÝÀÀ°î¼±(Ground reaction curve)À» ±¸ÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀº ÀϹÝÀûÀ¸·Î ¿øÇü´Ü¸éÀ̰í Ãø¾Ð°è¼ö K£½1.0ÀÎ »óŸ¦ °¡Á¤ÇÑ closed from solutionÀ» ÅëÇØ¼­ ±¸ÇØÁöÁö¸¸, ½ÇÁ¦ ÇöÀå¿¡¼­´Â ÁÖ·Î ¸¶Á¦Çü ±¼Âø´Ü¸éÀÌ »ç¿ëµÇ¸ç $K eq$1.0ÀÎ °æ¿ì ´ëºÎºÐÀÌ´Ù. Áö¹Ý ±¼Âø½Ã Ãø¾Ð°è¼ö¿Í ±¼Âø Çü»ó¿¡ µû¶ó Ãøº®¿¡¼­ÀÇ Ãʱâź¼ºº¯À§ ¹× ÀÓ°èÁöº¸¾ÐÀÌ º¯È­ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§ÇÏ¿© Ãø¾Ð°è¼ö °ªÀ» 0.5¢¦3.0 »çÀÌ¿¡¼­ º¯È­½Ã۰í, °¢ Ãø¾Ð°è¼ö¸¶´Ù Ãʱ⿬Á÷ÀÀ·ÂÀ» 5¢¦30MPa »çÀÌ¿¡¼­ º¯È­½ÃÄѰ¡¸é¼­ ¿øÇü´Ü¸é°ú ¸¶Á¦Çü ´Ü¸éÀÎ °æ¿ì¸¦ ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© ¼öÄ¡ÇØ¼®À» ÅëÇØ Áö¹Ý¹ÝÀÀ°î¼±À» ¾ò¾ú´Ù. Closed form solution¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¾ò¾îÁø Áö¹Ý¹ÝÀÀ°î¼±Àº Ãø¾Ð°è¼ö¿Í ±¼Âø´Ü¸éÀÇ Çü»óÀ» °í·ÁÇÏÁö ¸øÇϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ $K eq$1.0ÀÎ ½ÇÁ¦ Áö¹Ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ º¯À§°Åµ¿°ú Áö¹ÝÀÇ ÀÚ¸³¼ºÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â µ¥ Å« ¿ÀÂ÷¸¦ À¯¹ßÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­, Closed from solution¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Áöº¸ÀçÀÇ ¼³Ä¡½Ã±â¸¦ ¿¹ÃøÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº ¸¹Àº ¿ÀÂ÷¸¦ ¼ö¹ÝÇÏ´Â °úÁ¤À̹ǷÎ, ¼öÄ¡ÇØ¼®À» ÅëÇÑ Áöº¸¼³Ä¡ ½Ã±â¿Í ÀÚ¸³¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ËÅ並 ¼öÇàÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù.
Ground reaction curve is a very important information for evaluating the side wall displacements and installation time of the tunnle support. The ground reaction curve can be estimated by analytical closed form solutions derived on the supposition of circular section and isotropic stress condition. The conditions of stress field and tunnel configurations, however, are quite different in practice. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the effects of stress anisotropy and tunnel configurations in order to use simply in practical design. This paper describes a study of influence factors in the ground reaction curve. In order to evaluate the applicability of analytical closed form solution in practical design, two sets of parametric studies were carried out by numerical analysis in elastic tunnel behaviour: one set of studies investigated the influence of the K and the other set investigated the influence of the tunnel configurations such as circular and horse-shoe shape. In the studies, K value varies between 0.5 and 3.0, initial ground vertical stress varies between 5¢¦30MPa far each K values. The results indicated that the self-supportability of ground is larger in the ground having lower K value. However, it is suggested that the applicability of closed form solution may not be adequate to determine directly the installation time of the support and self-supportability of ground. It is necessary to consider stress anisotropy and tunnel configurations.
 
Ű¿öµå
Excavation shape;Ground reaction curve;Initial ground stress;Stress anisotropy;
 
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.18, no.6, 2002³â, pp.33-42
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-2427
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200211921511300)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿