¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ / v.19, no.1, 2003³â, pp.209-220
Hoek-Brown °ø½ÄÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÇöÀ埼³¸»¶ÒÀÇ Áָ鸶Âû·Â »êÁ¤
( Estimation of Shaft Resistance of Drilled Shafts Based on Hoek-Brown Criterion )
»ç°ø¸í;¹é±ÔÈ£; Æ÷Ç×»ê¾÷°úÇבּ¸¿ø °­±¸Á¶¿¬±¸¼Ò Åä¸ñ±¸Á¶¿¬±¸ÆÀ;°üµ¿´ëÇб³ À̰ø´ëÇÐ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÇöÀ埼³¸»¶ÒÀÇ ÁÖº¯¸¶Âû·ÂÀ» »êÁ¤Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© Hoek-Brown ¸ðµ¨ÀÇ ÀϹݰø½ÄÀÌ ¼öÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. ¿øÁö¹Ý »óŸ¦ °í·ÁÇÏ´Â Hoek-BrownÀÇ ÀϹݰø½Ä¿¡ ±Ù°ÅÇÏ¿© º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ Á¦¾ÈµÈ ´ÜÀ§ÁÖº¯¸é¸¶Âû·ÂÀÇ »êÁ¤±â¹ýÀº ÀÌÀü ¿øÁö¹Ý ¹«°á¾ÏÀÇ ÀÏÃà ¾ÐÃà°­µµ¸¸À» °í·ÁÇÏ¿© ´ÜÀ§Áָ鸶Âû·ÂÀ» »êÁ¤ÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ºñÇØ »ó´çÇÑ ¶Ù¾î³­ Àû¿ë¼ºÀ» º¸ÀδÙ. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ Á¦¾ÈµÈ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¾Ï¹Ý¿¡ ±ÙÀÔµÈ ÇöÀ埼³¸»¶ÒÀÇ ´ÜÀ§Áָ鸶Âû·Â¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »óÇѰè¿Í ÇÏÇѰ踦 ±¸¼ºÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ °¡´ÉÇϸç, ±âÁ¸ ¹®Çå¿¡ º¸°íµÈ ´ÜÀ§Áָ鸶Âû·Â¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ÃÇè°á°úÀÇ ´ëºÎºÐÀÌ ÀÌ µÎ ¹üÀ§¿¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î È®ÀεǾú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Á¦¾ÈµÈ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ÅëÇØ ´ÜÀ§Áָ鸶Âû·ÂÀ» »êÁ¤ÇÒ ¶§ ÀÔ·Â º¯¼ö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±âº»ÀûÀÎ °¡Á¤¸¸À¸·Îµµ ¿¹ÃøÄ¡¿Í ÃøÁ¤Ä¡°£¿¡´Â ÈǸ¢ÇÑ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ¿©±â¼­ µµÃâµÈ »ó°ü°ü°è½ÄÀ» ±âÁ¸ÀÇ °ø½Äµé°ú ºñ±³ÇÑ °á°ú ¹«°á¾ÏÀÇ °­µµ°¡ ÀÛÀº °æ¿ì¿¡´Â Horvath¿Í KenneyÀÇ Á¦¾È½ÄÀÌ, ±×¸®°í ¾ÏÀÇ °­µµ°¡ Å« °æ¿ì¿¡´Â Rosenberg¿Í JourneauxÀÇ Á¦¾È½ÄÀÌ »ó°ü½Ä°ú ±Ù»çÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ÇÑÆí GSI ¹× ±¸¼Ó¾Ð¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿µÇâºÐ¼®À» ¼öÇàÇÑ °á°ú µÎ ÀÎÀÚµé°ú Á¤±ÔÈ­µÈ ´ÜÀ§Áָ鸶Âû·ÂÀº µ¿¹Ý »ó½ÂÇÏ´Â °ü°è¸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ´ÜÀ§Áָ鸶Âû·ÂÀÇ »êÁ¤½ÄÀÌ ¸èÇÔ¼öÀÇ ÇüÅÂÀÏ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ´ÜÀ§Áָ鸶Âû·Â°ú ÀÏÃà¾ÐÃà °­µµ »çÀÌ¿¡ Àû¿ëµÇ´Â °è¼ö´Â GSI ¹× ±¸¼ÓÀÀ·Â¿¡ µû¶ó º¯ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î °üÃøµÇ¾ú´Ù.
Modification of general Hoek and Brown criterion is carried out to estimate the shaft resistance of drilled shaft socketed into rock mass. Since the general Hoek-Brown criterion can consider the in-situ state of the rock mass, the proposed method, estimating the unit shaft resistance of drilled shafts based on the Hoek-Brown criterion, has increased flexibility compared to other methods exclusively considering uniaxial compressive strength of intact rocks. The proposed method can form the upper and lower bounds, and most culled data (from 21 pile load tests) from the literature can be found between these two bounds. A comparison between the estimated and observed unit shaft resistances shows quite a good correlation even with crude assumptions for the input parameters. The best-fit line drawn from this analysis shows that at the lower strength of intact rocks (up to 10MPa), Horvath and Kenney's equation shows a good correlation with the measured values, and fur strong rocks Rosenberg and Journeaux's equation provides a close estimation with colleted data. The results of parametric studies for GSI and confining stress show that the normalized unit shaft resistance increases with these two factors. In addition, coefficient of the equational form of the estimation can vary with GSI and confining stresses.
 
Ű¿öµå
Drilled shaft;GSI;Hoek and Brown criterion;Intact rock;Side resistance;Uniaxial compressive strength;
 
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.19, no.1, 2003³â, pp.209-220
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-2427
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200311921582291)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿