|
|
|
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ / v.10, no.3, 2010³â, pp.91-97
|
´ëÇü°ÇÃ๰ÀÇ À¯ÃâÁöÇϼö Ȱ¿ëÀ» À§ÇÑ Æò°¡ ÇÁ·Î¼¼½º±¸Ãà¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( A Study on the Evaluation Process Development for the Use of Outflowing Groundwater in Large-Scale Buildings ) |
| ±èÀ翱;À̵¿Áø; ÃæÁÖ´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇаú;ÃæÁÖ´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| ÇöÀç °Ç¹° ºÎ·Â¿¡ ´ëÇÑ º¸È£Á¶Ä¡·Î °æÁ¦¼º ¹× È¿À²¼º Ãø¸éÀ» °í·ÁÇÏ¿© ¿µ±¸¹è¼ö °ø¹ýÀÇ »ç¿ëÀÌ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ¿µ±¸¹è¼ö°ø¹ýÀº °ÇÃ๰¿¡ Á¢ÇÏ´Â ÁöÇϼö¸¦ ¿ÜºÎ·Î ¹è¼ö½ÃÄÑ °ÇÃ๰¿¡ ÀÛ¿ëÇÏ´Â ºÎ·ÂÀ» ±Ùº»ÀûÀ¸·Î Á¦°ÅÇÏ´Â °ø¹ýÀ¸·Î, ¿µ±¸¹è¼ö°ø¹ý »ç¿ë½Ã À¯ÃâÁöÇϼö°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏ°Ô µÈ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó´Â ±¹Á¦Àα¸Çൿ¿¬±¸¼Ò(PAI)¿¡¼ ÁöÁ¤ÇÑ ¹° ºÎÁ· ±¹°¡·Î ÁöÁ¤µÇ¾î À¯ÃâÁöÇϼöÀÇ È°¿ëÀÌ ¿ä±¸µÇ°í ÀÖÁö¸¸ ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æò°¡ÇÁ·Î¼¼½º°¡ ¾ÆÁ÷ ÃæºÐÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Ù. µû¶ó¼ º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÇöÀå Àû¿ë »ç·Ê¸¦ ÅëÇØ ÇöÀå ´ÜÀ§¿¡¼ À¯ÃâµÇ´Â ÁöÇϼöÀÇ È°¿ë¿©ºÎ¸¦ °áÁ¤ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Æò°¡ ÇÁ·Î¼¼½º¸¦ ±¸ÃàÇÏ°í °æÁ¦¼ºÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× °á°ú »ó¼öµµ¿Í ºñ±³ÇÑ 10³â°£ »ó¼öÀý°¨ ºñ¿ëÀ» ÅëÇØ À¯ÃâÁöÇϼöÀÇ È°¿ëÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. |
|
| Recently, as a countermeasure to the buoyancy of a building, the use of permanent drainage methods have been on the increase, and these provide benefits both in terms of economical feasibility and efficiency. When a permanent drainage method is applied, some underground water can drain out. Korea has been designated by PAI (Population Action International) as a water-stressed country, and the use of outflowing groundwater is required for the efficient oversight of water resources. However, the evaluation process on the practical use of underground water is currently insufficient. Therefore, the amount of outflowing groundwater put to practical use and the standard for the water quality were examined in this research, with the aim of establishing anappraisal process on the practical use of underground water drainage. In addition, standards for the assessment of the treatment process and the application cost of underground water drainage were developed. On this basis, an evaluation process on the use of outflowing groundwater was developed and applied inthe field. The application result proved that it was possible to assess the initial investment cost and the maintenance and management cost in the field, and thesecan be compared to the costs when supplied water is used, which makes it possible to apply in the field. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| ¿µ±¸¹è¼ö°ø¹ý;À¯ÃâÁöÇϼö;Æò°¡ÇÁ·Î¼¼½º;Outflowing groundwater;Permanent drainage method;Evaluation process; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸÁö / v.10, no.3, 2010³â, pp.91-97
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1598-2033
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201027042828481)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|