|
|
|
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ / v.11, no.3, 2011³â, pp.292-300
|
°Ç¼³ °ø»ç´Ü°è¿¡¼ ¼ö±ÞÀÚ Áß½ÉÀÇ Ç°ÁúÈ®º¸¹æ¾È
( The Voluntary Assurance of Quality by Contractors in the Construction Phase ) |
| Â÷»óÈ£;ÀÌ»ó¹ü; ;;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| ÇöÀç ±¹³» °Ç¼³ »ê¾÷Àº °íÃþÈ, ´ëÇüÈ µÇ¾î°¨¿¡ µû¶ó »õ·Î¿î ±â¼ú °³¹ß·Î ºñ¾àÀûÀÎ ¹ßÀü°ú ÇÔ²² ǰÁúÇâ»óÀ» À§ÇØ Ç°Áú°ü¸®±â¹ý ¹× ǰÁú°ü¸®Á¦µµ °³¼±À» Çϰí ÀÖÁö¸¸, ±â¼ú°³¹ß¿¡ ºñÇØ °ÇÃ๰ÀÇ Ç°ÁúÇâ»ó¼öÁØÀº ¹ÌÈíÇÑ ¼öÁØÀÌ´Ù. ¹Ý¸é¿¡, »ç¿ëÀÚÀÇ Àǽĺ¯È·Î °Ç¼³Ç°Áú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü½ÉÀÌ Áõ°¡µÊ¿¡ µû¶ó ¿ä±¸Ç°Áú¼öÁØÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ´Ù. Á¤ºÎ¿¡¼´Â Ã¥ÀÓ°¨¸®Á¦µµÀÇ ½ÃÇà ¹× ÇØ¿Ü¾÷üÀÇ ±¹³» °¨¸®¾÷¹«ÁøÃâ Çã¿ë µîÀÇ Ç°ÁúÁ¦µµ¸¦ °ÈÇÏ¿´°í ¹× ¹Î°£ºÎ¹®¿¡¼µµ »çÀüÀڰݽɻçÁ¦µµÀÇ ½ÃÇà ¹× ISO 9000½Ã¸®ÁîÀÇ Ç°Áúº¸Áõ µîÀ» ÅëÇÑ Ç°Áú Çâ»óÀ» ²ÒÇϰí ÀÖÁö¸¸, ÇöÇà °Ç¼³°ø»ç´Â ¼³°è, Àç·á, °ø¹ý µîÀÌ ÀÌ¹Ì È®Á¤µÈ ¹ßÁÖÀÚÀÇ °ø»ç ½Ã¹æ¼¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °ø»ç¸¦ ¼öÇàÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó Á¤ÇØÁø »çÇ×ÀÇ ÀÌÇà ¿©ºÎ¸¸À» ÆÇ´ÜÇÒ »Ó ¼ö±ÞÀÚÀÇ Ç°Áú °³¼±À» À§ÇÑ ±â¼ú °³¹ßÀÇ Çʿ伺 ¹× ±âȸ¸¦ Á¦°øÇÏÁö ¸øÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â °Ç¼³ °ø»ç´Ü°è¿¡¼ ¼ö±ÞÀÚ°¡ ÀÚ¹ßÀûÀ¸·Î ǰÁúÈ®º¸¸¦ ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÁöºÒ±ÔÁ¤Á¦µµÀÇ ¾÷¹«ÇÁ·Î¼¼½º¿Í Á¦µµ°³¼± ¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. |
|
| The construction industry in Korea has seen significant improvements in quality management techniques, driven by the dramatic development of new technology through Manhattanization and enlargements, but compared with technical development, the level of building quality improvement is still lagging behind. In the meantime, as the interest in construction quality soars due to changes in user consciousness, the level of quality that is being demanded is rising. The government has reinforced quality systems by implementing responsible supervision requirements and granting overseas companies permission to enter the supervision business in Korea, and private sector companies also are attempting quality improvement through quality assurance approaches like the preliminary qualification screening system and ISO 9000 series. But currently, building constructions are done only according to the construction specifications of project owners, whose design, materials and construction methods are already decided, and do not leave any necessity or opportunity for technical developments for the quality improvement of contractors. Therefore, in this study, a work process and system improvement plan for payment regulations is proposed, with which contractors can secure quality voluntarily in the building construction phase. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| ÁöºÒ±ÔÁ¤Á¦µµ;ǰÁú°ü¸®;°èÃþºÐ¼®¹ý(AHP);pay adjustment system;quality management;analytic hierarchy process technique; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸÁö / v.11, no.3, 2011³â, pp.292-300
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1598-2033
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201121539232532)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|