¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ / v.33, no.4, 2000³â, pp.366-373
ºÎ¿µ¾çÈ£¼ö¿¡¼­ ³²Á¶·ù bloomÀÌ µ¿¹°Çöûũſ ±ºÁýº¯È­¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( Effects of Cyanobacterial Bloom on Zooplankton Community Dynamics in Several Eutrophic Lakes )
±è¹üö;ÃÖÀº¹Ì;Ȳ¼øÁø;±èÈ£¼·; °­¿ø´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ°úÇаú;°­¿ø´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ°úÇаú;°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ Áö¿ª»ýŽýºÅÛ°øÇаú;°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ Áö¿ª»ýŽýºÅÛ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
³²Á¶·ù°¡ ºó¹øÇÏ°Ô ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ºÎ¿µ¾ç È£¼ö¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ³²Á¶·ù ¹ß»ý½Ã µ¿¹°ÇöûũſÀÇ ±ºÁý±¸Á¶¸¦ ÆÄ¾ÇÇÏ¿´°í, ³²Á¶·ù¸¦ ¸ÔÀÌ¿øÀ¸·Î ÇÏ´Â µ¿¹°Çöûũſ ¹è¾ç½ÇÇèÀ» ÅëÇØ ½Ã°£¿¡ µû¸¥ µ¿¹°Çöûũſ ¹Ðµµ¿Í ¿ìÁ¡Á¾ÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ °üÂûÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¶»ç´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÑ ¸ðµç È£¼ö¿¡¼­ ³²Á¶·ù°¡ °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù. ´Ù¸¥ È£¼ö¿¡ ºñÇØ Áú¼Ò°¡ ½Ä¹°ÇöûũſÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀ» ¾ïÁ¦ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Á¤µµÀÇ ³óµµ(0.1 mg/l ÀÌÇÏ)·Î Á¸ÀçÇϰí ÀÖ¾ú´ø È­ÁøÆ÷¿¡¼­´Â Anabaena¼ÓÀÇ Á¾¸¸ÀÌ ÃâÇöÇÏ¿´°í, ±× ¿Ü ´Ù¸¥ È£¼ö¿¡¼­´Â Microcystis¼ÓÀÇ Á¾µéÀÌ ¿ìÁ¡Á¾À¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ³²Á¶·ù°¡ °üÂûµÈ È£¼ö¿¡¼­ÀÇ µ¿¹°Çöûũſ ±ºÁýÀº À±Ãæ·ù°¡ ¿ìÁ¡ÇÏ¿´°í °¢ È£¼ö¸¶´Ù ¿ìÁ¡Á¾¿¡´Â Â÷À̰¡ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸³ª Keratella, Polyarthra°¡ ¿ìÁ¡Á¾À¸·Î Á¶»çµÇ¾ú´Ù. µ¿¸éÀú¼öÁö¿¡¼­´Â ´Ù¸¥ È£¼öµé¿¡¼­ÀÇ °á°ú¿Í´Â ´Þ¸® ³²Á¶·ùÀÇ ¼¼Æ÷¹Ðµµ°¡ ³ô¾Ò´ø ½Ã±â¿¡ ¿ä°¢·ùÀÇ ±¸¼ººñ°¡ ³ô¾ÒÀ¸³ª, ³²Á¶·ùÀÇ »ý¹°·® °¨¼Ò¿Í ´õºÒ¾î ¿ä°¢·ùÀÇ »ý¹°·®Àº °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´°í, À±Ãæ·ùÀÇ ¹Ðµµ´Â Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À±Ãæ·ù ±ºÁý ³» ¿ìÁ¡Á¾Àº Keratella,Hexathra ±×¸®°í Polyarthra¿´´Ù. ³²Á¶·ù¸¦ ¸ÔÀÌ·Î °ø±ÞÇÏ¿© µ¿¹°Çöûũſ ±ºÁý º¯È­¸¦ °üÂûÇÑ ¹è¾ç½ÇÇè¿¡¼­´Â ³²Á¶·ù ÁÖÀÔ 4ÀÏ ÈÄ ¿ä°¢·ùÀÇ ¹Ðµµ°¡ ±Þ°ÝÇÏ°Ô °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´À¸³ª (¾à 90%), À±Ãæ·ù´Â Keratella ${ o}$ Pompholyx ${ o}$ Monostyla·Î ¹Ù²î´Â ¿ìÁ¡Á¾ º¯È­¿Í ´õºÒ¾î ¹Ðµµ°¡ Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú´Â, À±Ãæ·ù°¡ ±ºÃ¼ Çü¼º ȤÀº µ¶¼Ò»ý¼º µîÀ¸·Î µ¿¹°ÇöûũſÀÇ ¼·½Ä Ȱµ¿À» ¾ïÁ¦ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ³²Á¶·ù¿¡ ´ëÇØ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ³ôÀº ÀûÀÀ ´É·ÂÀ» °¡Áö°í ÀÖÀ½À» ½Ã»çÇÑ´Ù.$day$^{-1}$À̾ú°í, 20 m ¼ö½É¿¡¼­ äÁýµÈ ½Ã·á¿¡¼­´Â 0.88${sim}$1.04 mg O$_{2}{cdot}$l$^{-1}{cdot}$day$^{-1}$ÀÌ¿´´Ù. ¼ö½É¿¡ µû¸¥ À¯±â¹°ÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ º¸¸é, 5m¿¡¼­ äÁýµÈ À¯±â¹°ÀÇ ¿±·Ï¼Ò a ³óµµ´Â 20 m¿¡¼­ ȸ¼öµÈ À¯±â¹°ÀÇ 30% Á¤µµÀ̳ª, »ê¼Ò¼Ò¸ðÀ²Àº 70% ¼öÁØÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °á°ú¿¡¼­ ÆÈ´çÈ£¿¡¼­´Â Ç¥Ãþ¿¡¼­ ½Ä¹°Çöûũſ¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© »ý¼ºµÈ À¯±â¹° Áß ÀúºÐÀÚ À¯±â¹°Àº ½±°Ô »ê¼Ò¸¦ ¼Ò¸ðÇÏ¿© ºÐÇØµÇÁö¸¸, °íºÐÀÚ À¯±â¹°Àº ±×´ë·Î ÀúÃþ¿¡ ½×¿©, ÀúÁúÅäÀÇ »ê¼Ò ¼Ò¸ðÀ²¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ÁÖ°í ÀÖÀ½À» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù.À¸·ÎÀÇ À¯¿ª°ü¸®´Â Á¡¿À¿°¿øÀÇ °ü¸®¿Í ´õºÒ¾î ºñ·á»ç¿ë·®ÀÇ Ãà¼Ò, Ãà»êºÐ´¢ÀÇ ÀûÀýÇÑ Ã³¸®, Åä¾çÀ¯½Ç¹æÁöµî À¯¿ªÀÇ ºñÁ¡¿À¿°¿ø¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü¸®¿¡ ´õ¿í ÁýÁßÇØ¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸ÀδÙ.¾÷¿ë Àú¼öÁöÀÇ ¼öÁú¿¹Ãø¿¡ ÀÖ¾î´Â º¹ÀâÇÑ À¯Ãâ¸ðÇüÀ̳ª À¯¿ª¸ðÇü, È£¼Ò¼öÁú¸ðÇü µîÀ» »ç¿ëÇϱ⺸´Ù´Â º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­¿Í¡¡°°ÀÌ ±âÁ¸ÀڷḦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© µµÃâÇÑ °æÇèÀû °ü°è½ÄÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¸é ºñ±³Àû ÀûÀº ³ë·ÂÀ¸·Îµµ »ó´çÈ÷ ½Å·Ú¼ºÀÖ°Ô ¿¹ÃøÇÏ¿© ¼öÁú°ü¸®¿¡ µµ¿òÀÌ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù.°¡ Á¤È­È¿À²°úÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°èº¸´Ù Á»´õ À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. À̰ÍÀº ³ôÀº ¼ö¸®ÇÐÀû ºÎÇÏÁ¶°ÇÀÌ ¿µ¾ç¿°·ù µîÀÇ Á¤È­È¿À²¿¡´Â Å©°Ô ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡Áö ¾ÊÀ½À» º¸¿©ÁÖ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, µû¶ó¼­ ºñ±³Àû ³·Àº ³óµµÀÇ ¿µ¾ç¿°·ù¸¦ °¡Áö°í ÀÖ°í, ¸¹Àº 󸮼ö·®À» ¿ä±¸ÇÏ´Â ºÎ¿µ¾çÈ­µÈ Àú¼öÁöÀÇ ¼öÁú°³¼±À» À§Çؼ­´Â ³ôÀº ¼ö¸®ÇÐÀû ºÎÇÏÁ¶°Ç¿¡¼­ ½Ã°£´ç Á¤È­·®À» ´Ã¸®´Â °ü¸®¹æ¹ýÀÌ °æÁ¦ÀûÀ̸ç, ÀÌ¿¡ ÃÊÁ¡À» ¸ÂÃß¾î ³ª°¡¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.µµ·Î
Toxin production and low digestibility of cyanobacteria are known to cause low exploitability of cyanobacteria by zooplankton. In this study, we compared relative tolerance and compatibility of zooplankton taxa in eight eutrophic lakes, exposed to frequent cyanobacterial blooms, uring the summer season of 1999. Microcystis, Anabaena, Oscillatoria and Phormidium were common cyanobacteria in all lakes. with relatively lower $NO_3-N$ concentration (<0.2 mgN/l) and TN/TP ratio (<20), compared with other lakes where colonial cyanobacteria dominated. Rotifers were dominant zooplankton in most lakes, and among them, Keratella, Polyarthra and Hexathra were common. The laboratory feeding experiment showed that relative copepods that greatly decreased (90%) after 4 day when cyanobacteria were used as the food source of zooplankton, while rotifers gradually increased with the change of dominant taxa from Keratella through Pompholyx to Monostyla. These results suggest that rotifers may be capable of coexisting with cyanobacteria by exploiting them for the food source.
 
Ű¿öµå
Cyanobacteria;Rotifers;TN/TP weight ratio;Zooplankton;
 
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸÁö / v.33, no.4, 2000³â, pp.366-373
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1976-8087
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200018317176426)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿