|
|
|
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ / v.41, no.3, 2008³â, pp.367-373
|
ºÏÇѰ ¼ö°è¿¡ ºÐÆ÷ÇÏ´Â ¸»Á¶°³ÀÇ ³²Á¶·ù ¼·½ÄƯ¼º
( Grazing Effects of Freshwater Bivalve Unio douglasiae of the North Han River on the Cyanobacterial Bloom Waters ) |
| ÀÌ¿¬ÁÖ;±è¹éÈ£;Ȳ¼øÁø; °Ç±¹´ëÇб³ »ý¸íȯ°æ°úÇдëÇРȯ°æ°úÇаú;°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ »ý¸íȯ°æ°úÇдëÇРȯ°æ°úÇаú;°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ »ý¸íȯ°æ°úÇдëÇРȯ°æ°úÇаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| À¯Çس²Á¶ÀÇ »ý¹°ÇÐÀû Á¦¾î¸¦ À§ÇÑ ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ÀÏȯÀ¸·Î ºÏÇѰ¼ö°è(°¡Æò)¿¡ ¼½ÄÇÏ´Â ÀÌ¸ÅÆÐ ¸»Á¶°³(Unio douglasiae)ÀÇ ¼·½ÄƯ¼ºÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼·½Ä½ÇÇèÀº Å©°Ô ½Ã°£º°, °³Ã¼Å©±â, µ¿¹°¹Ðµµ, ¸ÔÀ̹еµ (¿±·Ï¼Ò-a ³óµµ) µî¿¡ µû¶ó ÆÐ·ùÀÇ ¿©°úÀ² ¹× ¹è¼³¹° »ý»ê·®À» °¢°¢ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸»Á¶°³ÀÇ ¿©°úÀ²Àº ¼·½Ä ÈÄ Àû¿ë 7½Ã°£Â° (0.21 L $g^{-1}h^{-1}$, 0.54 mg $g^{-1}h^{-1}$), Å©±â 5 cmº¸´Ù ÀÛÀº °³Ã¼¿¡¼ ÃÖ°í ¿©°úÀ² ¹× ¹è¼³¹° »ý»ê·® (5.89 L $g^{-1}h^{-1}$, 16.38 mg $g^{-1}h^{-1}$)À» °¢°¢ ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ °¡Àå ³·Àº ¸ÔÀ̹еµ (¿±·Ï¼Ò-a 88.5 ${mu}gL^{-1}$)¿¡¼ 0.41 L $g^{-1}h^{-1}$·Î ÃÖ°í ¿©°úÀ²À» º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ÀÏÁ¤ ¸ÔÀÌ³óµµ À̻󿡼´Â ¹è¼³¹° »ý»ê·®ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ÆÐ·ùÀÇ Á¶·ù Á¦¾îÈ¿°ú´Â °³Ã¼ ¹Ðµµ°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÒ¼ö·Ï ¶Ñ·ÇÇÑ È¿°ú¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. °á±¹ ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°úµéÀº ºÏÇѰ¿¡ ¼½ÄÇÏ´Â ÀÌ¸ÅÆÐ ¸»Á¶°³°¡ ºÎ¿µ¾çÈ£¼öÀÇ ³²Á¶·ù Á¦¾îÀÇ À¯¿ë»ý¹°·Î¼ Àû¿ë °¡´É¼ºÀ» ÀÔÁõÇÏ¿´´Ù. |
|
| A freshwater bivalve (Unio douglasiae) was examined to assess the filtering rate (FR) on the cyanobacterial assemblage in a hypertrophic lake. Animal U. douglasiae used in the present study was collected using a hand-operated dredge from the North Han River (Gapyeong, Korea). The FR was measured at different feeding conditions such as feeding interval (1, 4, 7, and 24 h), mussel size (4.2$sim$8.1 cm, n=23), prey concentration (506.7, 409.8, 327.5, 199.7 and 88.6 ${mu}g;L^{-1}$), and mussel density (0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 indiv. $L^{-1}$). On the applied feeding interval, the maximum FR (0.21 L $g^{-1}h^{-1}$) and minimum feces production (FP, 0.12 mg $g^{-1}h^{-1}$) were observed at 1 and 24 hr, respectively. Both weight-based FR and FP were not correlated with the mussel size, and the values lied in a limited range with some degree of variation. Likewise, no significant relations between FR and FP were observed in the mussel size. The FR values were negatively correlated with food concentration, but positively with FP. For the food concentrations, the maximum FR (0.41 L $g^{-1}h^{-1}$) and FP (0.16 mg $g^{-1}h^{-1}$) were 88.6 ${mu}gL^{-1}$ and 327.5 ${mu}gL^{-1}$, respectively. These results indicate that U. douglasiae collected from the North Han River, although the filtering rate were slightly less than Keum River mussel, may be applied as a strategic bio-filter to mitigate cyanobacterial bloom in eutrophic lake. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| freshwater bivalve;Unio douglasiae;cyanobacterial bloom;grazing rate;feces production; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸÁö / v.41, no.3, 2008³â, pp.367-373
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1976-8087
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200833338919344)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|