¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ / v.41, no.2, 2008³â, pp.237-246
Àú¿Â±â ºÎ¿µ¾ç ¼ö°èÀÇ ±ÔÁ¶ ¹ß»ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸»Á¶°³ÀÇ ¼·½ÄƯ¼º
( Grazing Effects of Freshwater Bivalve Unio douglasiae on the Hibernal Diatom Bloom in the Eutrophic Lake and Stream )
À̼Ûȸ;Ȳ¼øÁø;±è¹éÈ£; °Ç±¹´ëÇб³ »ý¸íȯ°æ°úÇдëÇРȯ°æ°úÇаú;°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ »ý¸íȯ°æ°úÇдëÇРȯ°æ°úÇаú;°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ »ý¸íȯ°æ°úÇдëÇРȯ°æ°úÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
¼­·Î ´Ù¸¥ ¹°¸®-È­ÇÐÀû ¼º°ÝÀÌ ´Ù¸¥ Àú¿Â±â µÎ ºÎ¿µ¾ç¼ö°è¿¡¼­ ¿ìÁ¡ÇÏ´Â ±ÔÁ¶·ù Áß½ÉÀÇ ÇöÀå¼ö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Çѱ¹»ê ¸»Á¶°³(Unio douglasiae)ÀÇ ¼·½ÄƯ¼º-¿©°ú´É ¹× ¹è¼³¹° »ý»êÀ» °¢°¢ ºñ±³ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. µÎ ½ÇÇè¼ö ¸ðµÎ ÆÐ·ù¹Ðµµ°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÒ¼ö·Ï ¶Ñ·ÇÇÑ ¿±·Ï¼Ò $alpha$ °¨¼Ò¸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ÇѰ­½Ã·á´Â 1½Ã°£ ÀÌÈĺÎÅÍ, Àϰ¨È£ ½Ã·á´Â ÆÐ·ù ó¸®¿Í ÇÔ²² Áï½Ã °¨¼Ò¿´´Ù. ÇѰ­½Ã·á´Â °í¹Ðµµ 󸮿¡¼­ °¨¼ÒÀ²ÀÌ ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç (¾à 90%), Àϰ¨È£½Ã·á´Â ÆÐ·ù¹Ðµµ °£¿¡ ´Ù¼Ò Â÷ÀÌ´Â º¸¿´À¸³ª °í¹Ðµµ±º¿¡¼­µµ 50% Á¤µµ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¶·ù ÇöÁ¸·®ÀÇ º¯È­°æÇâ´Â ¿±·Ï¼Ò¿Í À¯»çÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ½Ã·á¿Í Á¶·ùÁ¾¿¡ µû¶ó Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ÆÐ·ùÀÇ Á¶·ù¿©°ú´ÉÀº ÆÐ·ùÀû¿ë 1½Ã°£Â° ½Ã·á °£¿¡´Â Å« Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´À¸³ª ½Ã°£ÀÌ °æ°úÇÒ¼ö·Ï À¯»çÇÑ ¼öÁØ¿¡ µµ´ÞÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹è¼³¹° »ý»êÀº ÇѰ­½Ã·á¿¡¼­´Â ¹Ðµµ°£¿¡ Â÷À̰¡ Àû¾úÀ¸¸ç Àϰ¨È£ÀÇ ³ôÀº Àüµµµµ¿Í ʵµ, ³·Àº DO Æ÷È­µµ¿¡¼­´Â ¹Ðµµ °£¿¡ 100¹è ÀÌ»óÀÇ Å« Â÷À̸¦ ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. ƯÈ÷ Àϰ¨È£¿¡¼­ °í¹Ðµµ ÆÐ·ù Àû¿ë½Ã, ³·Àº ¿±·Ï¼Ò(Á¶·ù)°¨¼Ò ¹× ³ôÀº ¹è¼³¹° »ý»ê µîÀº ¼ÒÈ­°¡ ¾î·Á¿î °íÇü¹°ÀÇ ÃàÀûÈ¿°ú°¡ ³ô¾Æ Àú¿Â±â µ¿¾È ʵµ°¡ ³ôÀº ÇÏõ ¹× È£¼öÀÇ ¼öÁú°³¼±¿¡ ¸Å¿ì È¿°úÀûÀÏ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÇ¾ú´Ù.
Filtration rates and fecal production of freshwater bivalve, Unio douglasiae on two kinds of hibernal diatom communities were measured simultaneously in a laboratory. One community is the Han River (HAN), which dominated by Asterionella Formosa. Stephanodiscus hantzschii (ca. 98% of total phytoplankton). The other community is the Ilgam Lake (IL), which dominated by Synedra ulna, Scenedesmus sp. Microcystis aeruginosa (ca. 82%). The HAN water has higher concentrations of nutrient (TN and TP) and chlorophyll $alpha$ (Chl-$alpha$), lower turbidity and conductivity than the IL water. Water sampling for the feeding experiment was conducted in the same day (Jan 15, 2008) and similar time (AM 10:00 for HAN, AM 11:00 for IL). Mussels with the similar size ($0.0{pm}0.5;cm$) were collected from the Gunsan and Okgu district (Jeonbuk), and starved in a laboratory for 2 days before the experiment. The experiment comprised CON (no addition of mussel), LOW (addition of mussel at 0.3 indiv. $L^{-1}$), MID (1.0 indiv. $L^{-1}$) and HIGH (2.0 indiv. $L^{-1}$), respectively. With the increment of mussel density and time, the concentration of Chl-$alpha$ in two diatom communities were clearly decreased; Chl-$alpha$ of HAN gradually decreased after 1 hour of mussel treatment, while that of IL decreased as soon as mussel introduction. In 7 hours of treatment, the former was removed finally up to about 90% of control, while the later was remained as about 50%. Under the presence of mussel, total phytoplankton density was shifted as the similar patterns to that of Chl-$alpha$ (r=0.705, P<0.0001), however, there showed the drastic differences following a species. Based on the concentration of Chl-$alpha$, filtration rate of U. douglasiae averaged 0.266 $L;g^{-1};h^{-1}$ (0.115 to 0.442) on HAN and $0.577;L;g^{-1};h^{-1}$ (0.146 to 1.428) on IL water, respectively. There were no differences in feces production among the mussel density in the HAH water (ANOVA, P>0.5), while in IL water, including lots of seston, the HIGH mussel produced the higher fecal materials, over one hundred times of LOW. These results suggest that freshwater bivalve Unio douglasiae have the alternative potential, as a filter-feeder of seston in turbid lake, and a biological controller of diatom bloom in cold stream.
 
Ű¿öµå
cold eutrophic waters;diatom community;feshwater bivalve;Unio douglasiae;filtration;feces production;
 
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸÁö / v.41, no.2, 2008³â, pp.237-246
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1976-8087
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200827448607762)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿