|
|
|
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ / v.36, no.3, 2003³â, pp.286-294
|
¼ö½ÉÀÌ ¾èÀº ºÎ¿µ¾ç ÀΰøÈ£(Àϰ¨È£)ÀÇ µ¿ ${cdot}$ ½Ä¹°Çöûũſ µ¿ÅÂÇÐ
( Dynamics of Phytoplankton and Zooplankton of a Shallow Eutrophic Lake (lake llgam) ) |
| ±èÈ£¼·;¹ÚÁ¦Ã¶;Ȳ¼øÁø; °Ç±¹´ëÇб³ Áö¿ª°Ç¼³È¯°æ°øÇаú;±Ý¿À°ø°ú´ëÇб³;°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ Áö¿ª°Ç¼³È¯°æ°øÇаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¼ö½ÉÀÌ ¾è°í ºÎ¿µ¾çȰ¡ Áö¼ÓµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â ÀΰøÈ£¼ö¿¡¼ÀÇ µ¿ ${cdot}$½Ä¹°ÇöûũſÀÇ Á¾ Á¶¼º°ú ÇöÁ¸·®ÀÇ °èÀýº¯È, ¼öÁúÀÎÀÚ¿ÍÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è ±×¸®°í PEG¸ðµ¨°úÀÇ ºñ±³¸¦ À§ÇØ ½Ç½ÃµÇ¾ú´Ù. ½Ä¹°ÇöûũſÀÇ ºÐ·ù±º º° °èÀýÀû ÃâÇö¾ç»óÀº º½°ú °¡À»¿¡ ³ìÁ¶·ù¿Í ±ÔÁ¶·ù°¡ ¿ìÁ¡ÇÏ°í ¿©¸§¿¡ ³²Á¶·ùÀÇ ÇöÁ¸·®ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó PEG¸ðµ¨°ú À¯»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ÇöÁ¸·®¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¿ìÁ¡Á¾ÀÇ º¯È´Â 2002³â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ 3¿ù°¡Áö ³ìÁ¶·ù°¡ ¿ìÁ¡Çß´ø °ÍÀ» Á¦¿ÜÇϰí´Â Á¶»ç±â°£ ³»³» ³²Á¶·ù°¡ ¿ìÁ¡ ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á PEG¸ðµ¨°ú ´Ù¸£°Ô ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. ¼öü ³» ¿µ¾ç¿°ÀÇ Áõ°¡°¡ ³ªÅ¸³ º½Ã¶ ³ìÁ¶·ù°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´°í, ¹«±â¿µ¾ç¿°ÀÇ °¨¼Ò¿Í ÇÔ²² ³²Á¶·ùÀÇ ¿ìÁ¡ºñÀ²ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÁÖ¿äÃâÇö ³²Á¶·ù´Â Microcystis, Oscillatoria, Lyngbya, Merismopedia¼Ó ³»Á¾µé ÀÌ¿´°í, 2000³â 10¿ù¿¡ °¡Àå ³ôÀº ÇöÁ¸·®À» ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç (12.9${pm}$5.8${ imes}10^5$ cells/ml, 3.5${pm}$0.9${ imes}10^3{mu}gC/l$), ¿±·Ï¼Ò a ($r^2$ = 0.71, P< 0.001), TP³óµµ ($r^2$ = 0.62, P< 0.001)¿Í ¾çÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. ³ìÁ¶·ù°¡ ¿ìÁ¡ÇÑ 3¿ùºÎÅÍ 5¿ù »çÀÌ¿¡ À±Ãæ·ùÀÎ Keratella cochlearis¿Í °°Àº Å©±â°¡ ÀÛÀº À±Ãæ·ùÀÇ Áõ°¡°¡ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¼ºÃ¼º¸´Ù´Â ´ëºÎºÐ À¯»ýÀÇ ºñÀ²ÀÌ (70%ÀÌ»ó)³ô¾Ò´ø ¿ä°¢·ù¿Í Áö°¢·ù (Diaphanosoma brachyurum, Bosmina longirostrisµî)ÀÇ ÇöÁ¸·® Áõ°¡´Â ½Ä¹°Çöûũſ Áß ¿ÍÆí¸ðÁ¶·ù¿Í ±ÔÁ¶·ù°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÑ 6¿ù°ú 9¿ù »çÀÌ¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù($r^2$=0.73, P< 0.001). º» ¿¬±¸±â°£µ¿¾È µ¿¹°Çöûũſ ¼·½Ä¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Ã»¼ö±â´Â °üÂûµÇÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, µ¿ ${cdot}$ ½Ä¹°ÇöûũſÀÇ ´Ù¾ç¼ºÀº ½Ä¹°ÇöûũſÀÇ »ý¹°·® Áõ°¡ ½Ã ȸº¹µÇ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸°á°ú¿¡¼´Â ºÎ¿µ¾ç È£¼ö¿¡¼ µ¿¹°ÇöûũſÀÇ ¼·½ÄÀ̳ª Á¦ÇÑ¿µ¾ç¿°ÀÇ °áÇÌÀÌ ½Ä¹°ÇöûũſÀÇ ÇöÁ¸·®¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» Ãâ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸³ª ±ºÁýÀÇ º¯È¸¦ ¾ß±âÇÏÁö´Â ¸øÇÔÀÌ Á¦½ÃµÇ¾ú´Ù. |
|
| This study was attempted to understand seasonal dynamics of phyto- and zooplankton communities in shallow, eutrophic Lake llgam and to compare them with the PEG (Plankton Ecology Group) model. Seasonal succession pattern of phytoplankton community was similar to PEG model as Chlorophyceae and Baciliphyceae increase during spring and autumn fellowed by increase of Cyanophyceae. However, based on the cell density and biomass, a dominant phytoplankton community differed with PEG model: Cyanophyceae had been a dominant community throughout a year, except for ice-cover period during which Chlorophyceae was a dominant group. In spring, when ice melted and dissolved nutrients in water column increased, the increase of Chlorophyceae occurred: when nutrients (DIN and DIP) rapidly decreased, Cyanophyceae increase occurred. Microcystis, Oscillatoria, Lyngbya, Merismopedia were maior dominant species of Cyanophyceae and their cell density and/or biomass was the highest in October 2000 (12.9${pm}$5.8${ imes}10^5$ cells/ml, 3.5${pm}$0.9${ imes}10^3{mu}gC/l$). Cyanophyceae biomass showed positive relationship with chlorophyll a ($r^2$ = 0.71,P< 0.001) and TP concentration ($r^2$ = 0.62, P< 0.001). Small-sized rotifers such as Keratella cochlearis, increased between March and May when Chlorophyceae increased. Both high standing crop of copepods and cladocerans, such as Diaphanosoma brachyrum and Bosmina longirostris occurred between June and September accompanied with the increase of Dinophyceae and Bacillariophyceae. There was no evidence that clear-water phase was caused by zooplankton grazing. The diversity and evenness index of phyto- and/or zooplankton increased with chlorophyll a concentration. These results suggest zooplankton grazing and limiting nutrient deficiency could lead to change of phytoplankton biomass, but not the phytoplankton community in Lake llgam. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| phytoplankton;zooplankton;PEG model;Lake Ilgam; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸÁö / v.36, no.3, 2003³â, pp.286-294
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1976-8087
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200318317181556)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|