|
|
|
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ / v.37, no.1, 2004³â, pp.78-86
|
ÇѰ ÇÏ·ùÀÇ È¯°æÇÐÀû ¿¬±¸ Vl. ºÎ¿µ¾ç ¿äÀÎÀÇ Åë°èÀû ÇØ¼®
( Environmental Studies in the Lower Part of the Han River Vl. The Statistical Analysis of Eutrophication Factors ) |
| Á¤½Â¿ø;Çãȸ±Ç;ÀÌÁøÈ¯; »ó¸í´ëÇб³ ÀÚ¿¬°úÇдëÇÐ ÀÚ¿¬°úÇкÎ;Çѱ¹Çؾç±â¼ú ºÎ¼³ ÇØ¾ç¿¬±¸¼Ò;»ó¸í´ëÇб³ ÀÚ¿¬°úÇдëÇÐ ÀÚ¿¬°úÇкÎ;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÇѰÇÏ·ùÀÇ ºÎ¿µ¾çÈ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ȯ°æ¿äÀΰú chlorophyll-aÀÇ »ó°ü¼ºÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© 2001³â 2¿ù 24ÀϺÎÅÍ 2002³â 2¿ù 9ÀϱîÁö °ÝÁÖ·Î ½Ã·á¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼ö¿ÂÀº $0.5^{circ}C$¿¡¼ $26.4^{circ}C$·Î ÀüÇüÀûÀÎ ¿Â´ë¼º ±âÈĸ¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú°í, pH´Â ¾à»ê¼º¿¡¼ ¾à¾ËÄ®¸®¼ºÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. TN°ú TPÀÇ ³óµµ ¹üÀ§´Â °¢°¢ 1.68${sim}$20.96 mg $L^{-1}$, 0.02${sim}$1.17 mg $L^{-1}$À̾ú°í, TN/TP ºñ´Â 22.46·Î »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ³ôÀº Áú¼Ò¿øÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. Chlorophyll-a ´Â 2.3${sim}$136.3 ${mu}g;L^{-1}$·Î °èÀýº° º¯À̰¡ ÄÇÀ¸¸ç, À̸¦ ¹°¸® ${cdot}$ ÈÇÐÀû ȯ°æ¿äÀΰú »ó°üºÐ¼®À» ÇÑ °á°ú, Á¤ÀÇ »ó°ü°è¼ö¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»´Â ¿äÀÎÀº BOD. COD. pH. $NH_4;^+$-N, TP. TN. Àü±âÀüµµ, $PO_4;^{3-}$-PµîÀÇ ¼ø¼¿´°í, ºÎÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è´Â $NO_3;^-$-NÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÇÑÆí ȯ°æ¿äÀÎÀÇ ¿äÀκм® °á°ú, Á¦1¿äÀÎÀº "¿µ¾ç¿°·ù ¿äÀÎ"À¸·Î Àü±âÀüµµµµ, BOD, COD, ºÎÀ¯¹°Áú, TN, TP, $NH_4;^+$-N, $PO_4;^{3-}$-P·Î ±¸ºÐµÇ¾ú°í, Á¦2¿äÀÎÀº "±âÈĺ¯µ¿ÀÇ ¿äÀÎ"À¸·Î ¼ö¿Â°ú DO·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, Á¦3¿äÀÎÀº "½Ä¹°ÇöûũſÀÇ ¹°Áú´ë»ç¿äÀÎ"À¸·Î pH¿Í $NO_3;^-$-NÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¿äÀκм®ÀÇ 3°¡Áö ¿äÀÎ Áß¿¡¼ Á¦1¿äÀÎÀÌ 43.08%·Î Á¦2¿äÀΰú Á¦3¿äÀÎÀÌ °¢°¢ 18.84%¿Í 14.28%·Î ÇѰÇÏ·ù¼ö¿ªÀÇ ¼öÁú Ư¼ºÀº ¿µ¾ç¿°·ùÀÎÀÚ¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿µÇâÀÌ Å©´Ù°í ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. Chlorophyll-aÀÇ ³óµµ¿Í ȯ°æ¿äÀÎÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ´Ü°èÀû ȸ±ÍºÐ¼® ÈÄ Ç¥ÁØÈÇÑ °á°ú, °áÁ¤°è¼ö (Ra)°¡ 0.32·Î Àü±âÀüµµµµ, $PO_4;^{3-}$-P, $NO_3;^-$-N,$NH_4;^+$-NÀÌ chlorophyll-aÀÇ º¯È¿¡ Å©°Ô ÀÛ¿ëÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÄ¾ÇµÇ¾ú´Ù. |
|
| In order to reveal the relationship between the concentration of chlorophyll- a and the environmental factors affecting eutrophication, the present study was biweekly conducted at G stations in the lower part of the Han river during the period from Feb. 24,2001 to Feb. 9,2002. Water temperature was changed from $0.5^{circ}C$ to $26.4^{circ}C$, pH was 5.77${sim}$8.99, DO 3.15${sim}$14,36 mg $L^{-1}$, BOD 0.90${sim}$7.45 mg $L^{-1}$, and COD 1.16${sim}$9.13 mg $L^{-1}$. TN and TP were ranged from 1.68${sim}$20.96 mg $L^{-1}$, and 0.02 ${sim}$ 1.17 mg $L^{-1}$, respectively. $NH_4;^+$-N, $NO_3;^-$-N, and $PO_4;^{3-}$-P were ranged from 0.56${sim}$3.60 mg $L^{-1}$, 0.03${sim}$7.29 mg $L^{-1}$, and 0.002${sim}$0.754 mg $L^{-1}$. Chlorophyll- a was extensively changed from 2.29 ${mu}g;L^{-1}$ to 136.28 ${mu}g;L^{-1}$ by month and stations. Results of nutrients indicated the eutrophic level in this area and water quality was the gradual worsening in the lower stations than those of upper stations during the period studied. The Pearson correlation analysis between the concentration of chlorophyll- a and the environmental factors indicated that BOD, COD, pH, $NH_4;^+$-N, TP, TN, conductivity and $PO_4;^{3-}$-P were positive correlation, but $NO_3;^-$-N was negative. The environmental factors investigated using the principal component method could be triparted. The first factor group included conductivity, BOD, COD, TN, TP, $NH_4;^+$-N, $PO_4;^{3-}$-P and SS, the second WT and DO, and the third pH and $NO_3;^-$-N. Using the stepwise regression analysis, chlorophyll- a was under the influence of conductivity, $PO_4;^{3-}$-P, $>NO_3;^-$-N and $NH_4;^+$-N Chlorophyll-a = 0.3661 ${ imes}$ (Conductivity) - 0.3592 ${ imes}$ ($PO_4;^{3-}$-P) - 0.3449 ${ imes}$ ($NO_3;^-$-N)+0.4362 ${ imes}$ ($NH_4;^+$-N. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| chlorophyll-a;environmental factors;eutrophication;Han River;statistical analysis; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸÁö / v.37, no.1, 2004³â, pp.78-86
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1976-8087
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200418317182428)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|