¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ / v.37, no.2, 2004³â, pp.255-262
¿ìÆ÷´Ë ¹°¾ï»õ (Miscanthus sacchariflorus) ±º¶ô¿¡¼­ »ýÀåÃʱ⿡ Àß¶óÁÖ±â¿Í Å¿öÁֱ⿡ µû¸¥ ¼ºÀ庯ȭ
( The Evaluation of Early Growth Pattern of Miscanthus sacchariflorus after Cutting and Burning in the Woopo Wetland )
±è±¸¿¬;ÀÌÂù¿ì;ÁÖ±âÀç; ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ »ý¹°Çаú;ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ »ý¹°Çаú;ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ »ý¹°Çаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
¹°¾ï»õ (Miscanthus sacchariflorus)±º¶ôÀÇ ¼ºÀå¿¡¼­ Àß¶óÁÖ±â, Å¿öÁֱⰡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§Çؼ­ ¿ìÆ÷´Ë¿¡¼­ ½ÇÇèÀ» ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 2003³â 4¿ù¿¡ ¹Ýº¹±¸ (5 ${ imes}$ 5 m)¸¦ ´ëÁ¶±¸, Å¿îÁö¿ª, ÀÚ¸¥Áö¿ª¿¡ ¼³Ä¡ÇÏ¿© 2003³â 8¿ù±îÁö ¼ºÀåÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢ 󸮱º³»¿¡¼­ ½Ä¹°ÀÇ Á¾ ¼ö´Â ´ëÁ¶±¸ 7°ú 8Á¾, Àß¶óÁÖ±â 6°ú 8Á¾, Å¿öÁÖ±â 14°ú 18Á¾À¸·Î Å¿öÁֱ⸦ ÇÑ ±º¶ô¿¡¼­ ½Ä¹° Á¾ ´Ù¾ç¼ºÀÌ °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ±×·¯³ª 7¿ù ÀÌÈÄ´Â ½Ä¹° Á¾¼ö°¡ ±Þ°ÝÈ÷ ÁÙ¾îµé¾î ºñ½ÁÇØÁ³´Ù. Å¿öÁֱ⸦ ÇÑ ±º¶ô¿¡¼­´Â µ¢±¼¼º ½Ä¹°ÀΠȯ»ïµ¢±¼ÀÌ ¿ìÁ¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 5¿ù ÃÊ ½Ä¹°Ã¼ÀÇ Ãʱâ¹ß¾Æ´Â Å¿öÁֱ⸦ ÇÑ Áö¿ª¿¡¼­ Æò±Õ 176 /$m^2$°³Ã¼·Î ´ëÁ¶±¸¿Í Àß¶óÁֱ⸦ ÇÑ Áö¿ª¿¡ ºñÇØ 2¹è ÀÌ»óÀÇ ³ôÀº ¹Ðµµ¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. »ýÀåÀÌ °ÅÀÇ ´Ù ÀÌ·ç¾îÁø 8¿ù¿¡´Â Àß¶óÁÖ±â (170 ${pm};7/m^2$)¸¦ ÇÑ Áö¿ªÀÌ Å¿öÁÖ±â (141 ${pm};9/m^2$)¸¦ ÇÑ Áö¿ªº¸´Ù »ýÀåÀÌ ¾çÈ£ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃÖÁ¾ ±æÀ̼ºÀåÀº Àß¶óÁÖ±â 205 ${pm}$ 15,Å¿öÁÖ±â 196 ${pm}$ 17, ´ëÁ¶±¸ 187 ${pm}$ 6 cm¼øÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¹°¾ï»õ±º¶ô Áö»óºÎÀÇ ÇöÁ¸·®Àº ´ëÁ¶±¸¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© Àß¶óÁֱ⸦ ½Ç½ÃÇÑ ±º¶ô¿¡¼­ ¾à 1.6¹è, Å¿öÁÖ±â 󸮸¦ ÇÑ ±º¶ô¿¡¼­ ¾à 1.4¹è·Î Áö»óºÎÁ¦°Å°¡ À¯ÀǼöÁØ 5% À̳»·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â Ãʱ⠻ýÀå±â¿¡ ¹°¾ï»õ¸¦ Å¿öÁֱ⺸´Ù´Â Àß¶óÁÖ¾úÀ» ¶§ ½Ä¹°Ã¼ÀÇ ¹ß¾Æ¿Í Ãʰí, Áö»óºÎÀÇ ÇöÁ¸·®ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÔÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ¾ú´Ù.
Growth patterns after the cutting and burning of Miscanthus sacchariflorus community were analyzed in the Woopo Wetland. Three replicates of 5 ${ imes}$ 5 m plot of control, burning, and cutting treatments were established in April 2003 and changes of growth pattern were monitored by August 2003. In the control, burning, and cutting plots, a total of 7 families and 8 species, 14 families and 18 species, 6 families and 8species were observed respectively. Burning plot showed high diversity of flora. However, high diversity declined after July and all plots showed a similar species diversity. Vine plant, Humulus japonicus, dominated in the burning plots. Change of shoot density was highest in the early period in the burning plots (176/$m^2$) and shoot density in early May was almost double of the control and cutting plots. Toward to the end of active growth period (August), shoot density in cutting plot (170 ${pm};7/m^2$)was higher than that of burning plots (141 ${pm};9/m^2$). Shoot length of the cutting, burning, and control plot was 205 ${pm}$ 15 cm, 190 ${pm}$ 17 cm, and 187 ${pm}$ 6 cm (n> 100) respectively. Above- ground biomass of cutting plots was higher than that of burning and control plots. Above- ground biomass of cutting plot was 1.6 times higher than the control while burning plot showed 1.4 times. This study indicted that cutting of Miscanthus sacchariflorus community increase shoot density development, length growth, and above- ground biomass.
 
Ű¿öµå
Miscanthus sacchariflorus;shoot cutting;shoot burning;Woopo Wetland;
 
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸÁö / v.37, no.2, 2004³â, pp.255-262
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1976-8087
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200418317182871)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿